Sloan v. N.D. Workforce Safety & Insurance, et al.
Docket No. 20100385
Oral Argument:
Thursday, March 31, 2011 1:30PM
Docket Info
- Title
- Claud Sloan, Claimant and Appellant
v.
North Dakota Workforce Safety
& Insurance, Appellee
and
ANG Coal Gasification Associates, Respondent - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : WORKERS COMPENSATION
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 10-C-01051
South Central Judicial District, Mercer County
Gail Hagerty
2011 ND 194804 N.W.2d 184
Oral Argument
3/31/2011
Highlight
Administrative rules that have been properly promulgated have the force and effect of law.
An administrative regulation is void or invalid if the regulation exceeds or supersedes the agency's statutory authority or conflicts with the statute it implements.
Rules and regulations properly promulgated are entitled to deference in the courts, unless they produce an absurd result, are arbitrary and capricious, or are inconsistent with statutes covering the same subject matter.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 12/06/2010 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 12/03/2010 | |
2 | 12/06/2010 | ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION : Sandstrom, Dale V. | |
3 | 12/10/2010 | DISK - tra (Administrative Hearing dated 11-5-09) (CD ROM) | |
4 | 01/11/2011 | Appellant Sloan's Motion for NDCC 28-32-50 Attorney's Fees and Costs (e-filed) - RspDue : 02/10/2011 | |
5 | 01/11/2011 | E-FILED MOTION (Mot/Atty/Fees) | |
6 | 01/11/2011 | RECORD ON APPEAL | |
7 | 01/11/2011 | APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) | View |
8 | 01/11/2011 | E-FILED BRIEF (ATB) | |
9 | 01/11/2011 | APPELLANT APPENDIX (E-FILED) PDF | |
10 | 01/11/2011 | E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA) PDF | |
11 | 01/12/2011 | RECEIVED $49.00 SURCHARGE FOR E-FILED ATB & ATA (RECEIPT #20130). | |
12 | 01/20/2011 | Received 7 copies of ATB from CSD | |
13 | 01/20/2011 | Rec'd 6 copies of ATA from CSD | |
14 | 01/24/2011 | Received additional $1.50 for e-filed ATB (Receipt #20148) | |
15 | 02/10/2011 | Response to Appellant's Motion for Attorney's Fees & Costs Filed | |
16 | 02/10/2011 | E-FILED MOTION (Response to Appellant's Motion/Atty/Fees) | |
17 | 02/10/2011 | APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed) | View |
18 | 02/10/2011 | E-FILED BRIEF (AEB) | |
19 | 02/10/2011 | APPELLEE APPENDIX (e-filed) | |
20 | 02/10/2011 | E-FILED APPENDIX (AEA) | |
21 | 02/10/2011 | E-FILED APPENDIX (AEA) | |
22 | 02/11/2011 | Received $53 surcharge for AEB & AEA (Receipt #20180) | |
23 | 02/14/2011 | Received 7 copies of AEB from Central Duplicating. | |
24 | 02/14/2011 | Received 6 copies of AEA from Central Duplicating. | |
25 | 02/15/2011 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
26 | 02/16/2011 | REPLY BRIEF (e-filed) | View |
27 | 02/16/2011 | E-FILED BRIEF (RYB) | |
28 | 02/18/2011 | SITTING WITH THE COURT : Graff, Benny A. | |
29 | 02/18/2011 | Received 7 copies of RYB from Central Duplicating. | |
30 | 03/31/2011 | APPEARANCES: Mark G. Schneider; Jacqueline S. Anderson, Special Asst. Attny. General | |
31 | 03/31/2011 | ARGUED: Schneider; Anderson | |
32 | 03/31/2011 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
33 | 09/19/2011 | DISPOSITION | |
34 | 09/19/2011 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : Maring, Mary Muehlen | View |
35 | 09/19/2011 | Costs on appeal to be taxed under N.D.C.C. § 65-10-03 | |
36 | 09/19/2011 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Motion for Attorney's Fees & Costs) - Denied | |
37 | 09/21/2011 | Judgment Sent to Parties | |
38 | 10/07/2011 | Corrected/Substitute Opinion Page 6 | |
39 | 10/26/2011 | MANDATE | |
40 | 10/28/2011 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE | |
41 | 05/05/2021 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |