Search Tips

State v. Gress

Docket No. 20110047
Oral Argument: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 9:30am

Docket Info

Title
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Dale Allen Gress, Defendant and Appellant
Case Type
CRIMINAL APPEAL : ASSAULT
Appeal From
Case No. 06-K-01194
South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Bruce B. Haskell
2011 ND 233807 N.W.2d 567
2011 ND 193803 N.W.2d 607
Oral Argument 8/30/2011

Highlight

A decision cannot be properly reviewed on appeal if the district court does not provide an adequate explanation of the basis for its decision.


Briefs

Filing Date Description
03/11/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF View
06/16/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF View

Counsel

Party Type Name
APPELLEE ASST. STATE'S ATTORNEY Jacob T. Rodenbiker - 06497
APPELLANT PRO SE Dale Gress

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. # Filing Date Description Attachment
1 02/16/2011 NOTICE OF APPEAL : 02/14/2011
2 03/14/2011 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL
3 03/11/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF View
4 03/11/2011 APPELLANT APPENDIX
5 03/11/2011 DISK NONCOMPLIANCE
6 04/07/2011 MOTION FOR Dismissal for Failure to Comply with Rules of Appellate Procedure
7 04/13/2011 Court request Appellant to address whether appeal is a misuse of process
8 04/13/2011 Due date for Appellee's brief stayed pending supplemental briefing
9 04/26/2011 Supplemental Brief
10 05/04/2011 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Mtn. to dismiss) - Denied
11 05/06/2011 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF (sua sponte)
12 05/06/2011 ACTION BY CLERK - Granted : 06/10/2011
13 06/09/2011 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF
14 06/09/2011 E-FILED MOTION (MAE)
15 06/10/2011 ACTION BY CLERK - Granted : 06/16/2011
16 06/16/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF View
17 06/16/2011 DISK-AEB (E-MAILED)
18 07/18/2011 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
19 07/22/2011 Made 6 copies of ATA
20 08/11/2011 Request to waive oral argument on behalf of the Appellee
21 08/12/2011 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Request to waive oral argument denied) - Denied
22 08/30/2011 Clerk's office informed Appellant would not be transported
23 08/30/2011 APPEARANCES: Appellant's waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(e); Jacob T. Rodenbiker, Asst. State's Attny.
24 08/30/2011 ARGUED: Rodenbiker
25 08/30/2011 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
26 09/15/2011 INTERIM DISPOSITION (REMANDED) View
27 09/15/2011 UNANIMOUS OPINION : Maring, Mary Muehlen View
28 09/15/2011 RETURN OF ROA TO DIST. CT.
29 09/20/2011 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
30 09/21/2011 Response on remand received from the Honorable Bruce B. Haskell
31 09/23/2011 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL (Entry Nos. 1 - 74)
32 10/21/2011 MOTION FOR APPROPRIATE REMEDY
33 12/13/2011 NO ACTION TAKEN (MOTION FOR APPROPRIATE REMEDY)
34 12/13/2011 DISPOSITION
35 12/13/2011 SPLIT OPINION : Maring, Mary Muehlen View
36 12/13/2011 CONCURRING SPECIALLY : Sandstrom, Dale V.
37 12/14/2011 Judgment Sent to Parties
38 01/04/2012 MANDATE
39 06/02/2021 EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed