Haugland v. City of Bismarck
Docket No. 20110077
Oral Argument:
Thursday, November 3, 2011 2:45pm
Docket Info
- Title
- Erling "Curly" Haugland, Plaintiff, Appellant and Cross-Appellee
v.
City of Bismarck, Defendant, Appellee and Cross-Appellant - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : TAX RELATED
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 10-C-00801
South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Donovan John Foughty
2012 ND 123818 N.W.2d 660
Oral Argument
11/3/2011
Highlight
Urban renewal statutes authorize a municipality to engage in an enterprise for a public purpose within the meaning of the gift clause provision of the state constitution.
Urban renewal statutes are rationally related to legitimate government purpose.
A modification of an urban renewal plan that substantially changes a prior renewal plan requires a municipal resolution that the renewal area consists of slum or blighted area.
A municipality is not required to remove parcels of property from a renewal area after the specific parcel has been redeveloped.
Urban renewal law does not authorize a perpetual urban renewal plan for a renewal area.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 03/21/2011 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 03/18/2011 | |
2 | 03/21/2011 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 03/18/2011 | |
3 | 03/21/2011 | ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION : Kapsner, Carol Ronning | |
4 | 03/23/2011 | RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL : 05/07/2011 | |
5 | 04/20/2011 | NOTICE OF CROSS APPEAL | |
6 | 04/20/2011 | RECORD ON APPEAL (3 volumes) | |
7 | 04/27/2011 | TRANSCRIPT DATED JANUARY 5, 2011, & C.O.S. | |
8 | 04/27/2011 | DISK-TRA (1.5.11) E-MAILED | |
9 | 06/03/2011 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) | |
10 | 06/03/2011 | E-FILED MOTION (MAT) | |
11 | 06/06/2011 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (MAT) - Granted : 07/15/2011 | |
12 | 07/14/2011 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) | |
13 | 07/14/2011 | E-FILED MOTION (Mot/Ext/ATB) | |
14 | 07/14/2011 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (MAT) - Granted : 07/26/2011 | |
15 | 07/26/2011 | APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) | View |
16 | 07/26/2011 | E-FILED BRIEF (ATB) | |
17 | 07/26/2011 | APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed) | |
18 | 07/26/2011 | E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA) | |
19 | 07/28/2011 | Received $255 e-filing surcharge for ATB & ATA (Receipt #20581) | |
20 | 07/28/2011 | Received correction to title page for ATB & ATA | |
21 | 08/01/2011 | Received 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating | |
22 | 08/01/2011 | Received 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating | |
23 | 08/17/2011 | Motion for extension of word limit for Appellee's Brief | |
24 | 08/17/2011 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (Granted extension of word limit by 1300 words) - Granted | |
25 | 08/25/2011 | APPELLEE BRIEF & Addendum (E-filed) | View |
26 | 08/25/2011 | E-FILED BRIEF (AEB) | |
27 | 08/25/2011 | APPELLEE APPENDIX (e-filed) | |
28 | 08/25/2011 | E-FILED APPENDIX (AEA) | |
29 | 08/26/2011 | Received $25 surcharge for AEB (Receipt #20634) | |
30 | 08/29/2011 | Received 7 copies of AEB from CSD | |
31 | 08/29/2011 | Received 6 copies of AEA from CSD | |
32 | 09/07/2011 | MOT. EXT/TIME REPLY BRIEF (e-filed) | |
33 | 09/07/2011 | E-FILED MOTION (MRY) | |
34 | 09/07/2011 | ACTION BY CLERK - Granted : 10/03/2011 | |
35 | 10/03/2011 | REPLY BRIEF of Appellant (E-filed) | View |
36 | 10/03/2011 | E-FILED BRIEF (RYB) | |
37 | 10/05/2011 | Received 7 copies of RYB from CSD | |
38 | 10/05/2011 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
39 | 10/20/2011 | Motion to Supplement the Record - RspDue : 10/25/2011 | |
40 | 10/19/2011 | SITTING WITH THE COURT : McLees, William W. | |
41 | 10/25/2011 | Response Filed to Motion to Supplement the Record | |
42 | 10/26/2011 | Request for Radio/TV Coverage (Dale Wetzel from Associated Press) approved | |
43 | 10/28/2011 | Request for Radio/TV Coverage (Bismarck Tribune, KFYR, Prairie Public) approved | |
44 | 11/03/2011 | APPEARANCES: Monte L. Rogneby; Randall J. Bakke; Shawn A. Grinolds | |
45 | 11/03/2011 | ARGUED: Monte L. Rogneby; Randall J. Bakke | |
46 | 11/03/2011 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
47 | 07/06/2012 | DISPOSITION (AND REMANDED) | |
48 | 07/06/2012 | NO ACTION TAKEN (Motion to Supplement the Record) | |
49 | 07/06/2012 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : Sandstrom, Dale V. | View |
50 | 07/06/2012 | Neither party shall have and recover costs on appeal | |
51 | 07/06/2012 | Judgment Sent to Parties | |
52 | 07/09/2012 | Corrected/Substitute Opinion Page 21 | |
53 | 07/31/2012 | MANDATE | |
54 | 08/02/2012 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE | |
55 | 05/27/2021 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |