Haugland v. City of Bismarck
Docket No. 20110077
Oral Argument:
Thursday, November 3, 2011 2:45pm
Docket Info
- Title
- Erling "Curly" Haugland, Plaintiff, Appellant and Cross-Appellee
v.
City of Bismarck, Defendant, Appellee and Cross-Appellant - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : TAX RELATED
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 10-C-00801
South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Donovan John Foughty
2012 ND 123818 N.W.2d 660
Oral Argument
11/3/2011
Highlight
Urban renewal statutes authorize a municipality to engage in an enterprise for a public purpose within the meaning of the gift clause provision of the state constitution.
Urban renewal statutes are rationally related to legitimate government purpose.
A modification of an urban renewal plan that substantially changes a prior renewal plan requires a municipal resolution that the renewal area consists of slum or blighted area.
A municipality is not required to remove parcels of property from a renewal area after the specific parcel has been redeveloped.
Urban renewal law does not authorize a perpetual urban renewal plan for a renewal area.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
| Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 03/21/2011 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 03/18/2011 | |
| 2 | 03/21/2011 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 03/18/2011 | |
| 3 | 03/21/2011 | ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION : Kapsner, Carol Ronning | |
| 4 | 03/23/2011 | RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL : 05/07/2011 | |
| 5 | 04/20/2011 | NOTICE OF CROSS APPEAL | |
| 6 | 04/20/2011 | RECORD ON APPEAL (3 volumes) | |
| 7 | 04/27/2011 | TRANSCRIPT DATED JANUARY 5, 2011, & C.O.S. | |
| 8 | 04/27/2011 | DISK-TRA (1.5.11) E-MAILED | |
| 9 | 06/03/2011 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) | |
| 10 | 06/03/2011 | E-FILED MOTION (MAT) | |
| 11 | 06/06/2011 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (MAT) - Granted : 07/15/2011 | |
| 12 | 07/14/2011 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) | |
| 13 | 07/14/2011 | E-FILED MOTION (Mot/Ext/ATB) | |
| 14 | 07/14/2011 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (MAT) - Granted : 07/26/2011 | |
| 15 | 07/26/2011 | APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) | View |
| 16 | 07/26/2011 | E-FILED BRIEF (ATB) | |
| 17 | 07/26/2011 | APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed) | |
| 18 | 07/26/2011 | E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA) | |
| 19 | 07/28/2011 | Received $255 e-filing surcharge for ATB & ATA (Receipt #20581) | |
| 20 | 07/28/2011 | Received correction to title page for ATB & ATA | |
| 21 | 08/01/2011 | Received 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating | |
| 22 | 08/01/2011 | Received 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating | |
| 23 | 08/17/2011 | Motion for extension of word limit for Appellee's Brief | |
| 24 | 08/17/2011 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (Granted extension of word limit by 1300 words) - Granted | |
| 25 | 08/25/2011 | APPELLEE BRIEF & Addendum (E-filed) | View |
| 26 | 08/25/2011 | E-FILED BRIEF (AEB) | |
| 27 | 08/25/2011 | APPELLEE APPENDIX (e-filed) | |
| 28 | 08/25/2011 | E-FILED APPENDIX (AEA) | |
| 29 | 08/26/2011 | Received $25 surcharge for AEB (Receipt #20634) | |
| 30 | 08/29/2011 | Received 7 copies of AEB from CSD | |
| 31 | 08/29/2011 | Received 6 copies of AEA from CSD | |
| 32 | 09/07/2011 | MOT. EXT/TIME REPLY BRIEF (e-filed) | |
| 33 | 09/07/2011 | E-FILED MOTION (MRY) | |
| 34 | 09/07/2011 | ACTION BY CLERK - Granted : 10/03/2011 | |
| 35 | 10/03/2011 | REPLY BRIEF of Appellant (E-filed) | View |
| 36 | 10/03/2011 | E-FILED BRIEF (RYB) | |
| 37 | 10/05/2011 | Received 7 copies of RYB from CSD | |
| 38 | 10/05/2011 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
| 39 | 10/20/2011 | Motion to Supplement the Record - RspDue : 10/25/2011 | |
| 40 | 10/19/2011 | SITTING WITH THE COURT : McLees, William W. | |
| 41 | 10/25/2011 | Response Filed to Motion to Supplement the Record | |
| 42 | 10/26/2011 | Request for Radio/TV Coverage (Dale Wetzel from Associated Press) approved | |
| 43 | 10/28/2011 | Request for Radio/TV Coverage (Bismarck Tribune, KFYR, Prairie Public) approved | |
| 44 | 11/03/2011 | APPEARANCES: Monte L. Rogneby; Randall J. Bakke; Shawn A. Grinolds | |
| 45 | 11/03/2011 | ARGUED: Monte L. Rogneby; Randall J. Bakke | |
| 46 | 11/03/2011 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
| 47 | 07/06/2012 | DISPOSITION (AND REMANDED) | |
| 48 | 07/06/2012 | NO ACTION TAKEN (Motion to Supplement the Record) | |
| 49 | 07/06/2012 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : Sandstrom, Dale V. | View |
| 50 | 07/06/2012 | Neither party shall have and recover costs on appeal | |
| 51 | 07/06/2012 | Judgment Sent to Parties | |
| 52 | 07/09/2012 | Corrected/Substitute Opinion Page 21 | |
| 53 | 07/31/2012 | MANDATE | |
| 54 | 08/02/2012 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE | |
| 55 | 05/27/2021 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |