Search Tips

Haugland v. City of Bismarck

Docket No. 20110077
Oral Argument: Thursday, November 3, 2011 2:45pm

Docket Info

Title
Erling "Curly" Haugland, Plaintiff, Appellant and Cross-Appellee
v.
City of Bismarck, Defendant, Appellee and Cross-Appellant
Case Type
CIVIL APPEAL : TAX RELATED
Appeal From
Case No. 10-C-00801
South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Donovan John Foughty
2012 ND 123818 N.W.2d 660
Oral Argument 11/3/2011

Highlight

Urban renewal statutes authorize a municipality to engage in an enterprise for a public purpose within the meaning of the gift clause provision of the state constitution.
Urban renewal statutes are rationally related to legitimate government purpose.
A modification of an urban renewal plan that substantially changes a prior renewal plan requires a municipal resolution that the renewal area consists of slum or blighted area.
A municipality is not required to remove parcels of property from a renewal area after the specific parcel has been redeveloped.
Urban renewal law does not authorize a perpetual urban renewal plan for a renewal area.


Briefs

Filing Date Description
07/26/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) View
08/25/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF & Addendum (E-filed) View
10/03/2011 REPLY BRIEF of Appellant (E-filed) View

Counsel

Party Type Name
APPELLEE PRIVATE PRACTICE Shawn Arlin Grinolds - 05407
APPELLANT PRIVATE PRACTICE Monte Lane Rogneby - 05029
APPELLEE PRIVATE PRACTICE Randall Joseph Bakke - 03898

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. # Filing Date Description Attachment
1 03/21/2011 NOTICE OF APPEAL : 03/18/2011
2 03/21/2011 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 03/18/2011
3 03/21/2011 ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION : Kapsner, Carol Ronning
4 03/23/2011 RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL : 05/07/2011
5 04/20/2011 NOTICE OF CROSS APPEAL
6 04/20/2011 RECORD ON APPEAL (3 volumes)
7 04/27/2011 TRANSCRIPT DATED JANUARY 5, 2011, & C.O.S.
8 04/27/2011 DISK-TRA (1.5.11) E-MAILED
9 06/03/2011 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed)
10 06/03/2011 E-FILED MOTION (MAT)
11 06/06/2011 ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (MAT) - Granted : 07/15/2011
12 07/14/2011 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed)
13 07/14/2011 E-FILED MOTION (Mot/Ext/ATB)
14 07/14/2011 ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (MAT) - Granted : 07/26/2011
15 07/26/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) View
16 07/26/2011 E-FILED BRIEF (ATB)
17 07/26/2011 APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed)
18 07/26/2011 E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA)
19 07/28/2011 Received $255 e-filing surcharge for ATB & ATA (Receipt #20581)
20 07/28/2011 Received correction to title page for ATB & ATA
21 08/01/2011 Received 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating
22 08/01/2011 Received 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating
23 08/17/2011 Motion for extension of word limit for Appellee's Brief
24 08/17/2011 ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (Granted extension of word limit by 1300 words) - Granted
25 08/25/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF & Addendum (E-filed) View
26 08/25/2011 E-FILED BRIEF (AEB)
27 08/25/2011 APPELLEE APPENDIX (e-filed)
28 08/25/2011 E-FILED APPENDIX (AEA)
29 08/26/2011 Received $25 surcharge for AEB (Receipt #20634)
30 08/29/2011 Received 7 copies of AEB from CSD
31 08/29/2011 Received 6 copies of AEA from CSD
32 09/07/2011 MOT. EXT/TIME REPLY BRIEF (e-filed)
33 09/07/2011 E-FILED MOTION (MRY)
34 09/07/2011 ACTION BY CLERK - Granted : 10/03/2011
35 10/03/2011 REPLY BRIEF of Appellant (E-filed) View
36 10/03/2011 E-FILED BRIEF (RYB)
37 10/05/2011 Received 7 copies of RYB from CSD
38 10/05/2011 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
39 10/20/2011 Motion to Supplement the Record - RspDue : 10/25/2011
40 10/19/2011 SITTING WITH THE COURT : McLees, William W.
41 10/25/2011 Response Filed to Motion to Supplement the Record
42 10/26/2011 Request for Radio/TV Coverage (Dale Wetzel from Associated Press) approved
43 10/28/2011 Request for Radio/TV Coverage (Bismarck Tribune, KFYR, Prairie Public) approved
44 11/03/2011 APPEARANCES: Monte L. Rogneby; Randall J. Bakke; Shawn A. Grinolds
45 11/03/2011 ARGUED: Monte L. Rogneby; Randall J. Bakke
46 11/03/2011 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
47 07/06/2012 DISPOSITION (AND REMANDED)
48 07/06/2012 NO ACTION TAKEN (Motion to Supplement the Record)
49 07/06/2012 UNANIMOUS OPINION : Sandstrom, Dale V. View
50 07/06/2012 Neither party shall have and recover costs on appeal
51 07/06/2012 Judgment Sent to Parties
52 07/09/2012 Corrected/Substitute Opinion Page 21
53 07/31/2012 MANDATE
54 08/02/2012 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE