Search Tips

Hale v. State of North Dakota, et al.

Docket No. 20110146
Oral Argument: Thursday, November 3, 2011 9:30am

Docket Info

Title
Robert Hale, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota; Jack
Dalrymple, in his official
capacity as Governor of North
Dakota; Shane Goettle, Director,
in his official capacity as
Director of the Department of
Commerce; North Dakota Department
of Commerce; the Minot Area
Development Corporation; the
Minot City Council ; and the City
of Minot, Defendants and Appellees
Case Type
CIVIL APPEAL : OTHER (Civil)
Appeal From
Case No. 10-C-01951
South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
David E. Reich
2012 ND 148818 N.W.2d 684
Oral Argument 11/3/2011

Highlight

Economic development constitutes an enterprise for a public purpose under the gift clause provision of the state constitution.
A party must do more than submit bare assertions to adequately raise constitutional issues, and without supportive reasoning or citation to relevant authorities, a constitutional argument is without merit.


Briefs

Filing Date Description
07/20/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) View
08/17/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF (State of ND, Dalrymple, Goettle and Dept. of Commerce) View
08/18/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF (Minot City Council & The City of Minot) View
08/19/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF (MADC) View
09/01/2011 REPLY BRIEF (e-filed) PDF View

Counsel

Party Type Name
APPELLEE ATT. GENERAL OFFICE Douglas Alan Bahr - 04940
APPELLEE PRIVATE PRACTICE Bryan Lee Van Grinsven - 05357
APPELLANT PRIVATE PRACTICE Lynn M Boughey - 04046
APPELLEE PRIVATE PRACTICE Randall Joseph Bakke - 03898

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. # Filing Date Description Attachment
1 05/16/2011 NOTICE OF APPEAL : 05/12/2011
2 06/08/2011 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 06/08/2011
3 06/09/2011 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (reset due to OTR filed by AE)
4 06/09/2011 ACTION BY CLERK (MAT - reset due to OTR filed by AE) - Granted : 06/21/2011
5 06/10/2011 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT & RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL : 07/28/2011
6 06/20/2011 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF
7 06/20/2011 E-FILED MOTION
8 06/20/2011 ACTION BY CLERK - Granted : 07/12/2011
9 06/22/2011 TRANSCRIPT DATED NOVEMBER 23, 2010, & C.O.S.
10 06/22/2011 DISK-tra (11/23/11) e-mailed
11 06/24/2011 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL (ENTRY NOS. 1-69) ENTRY NO. 70-CLERK'S CERT. OF RECORD
12 07/12/2011 APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed)
13 07/12/2011 E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA)
14 07/13/2011 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (sua sponte; due to ATB over the word limit)
15 07/13/2011 ACTION BY CLERK (MAT) (Sua Sponte; due to ATB being over the word limit) - Granted : 07/22/2011
16 07/20/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) View
17 07/20/2011 E-FILED BRIEF (ATB)
18 07/21/2011 Received $210 surcharge for ATB & ATA (Receipt #20572)
19 07/25/2011 Received 6 copies of ATA from CSD
20 07/26/2011 Received 7 copies of ATB from CSD
21 08/17/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF (State of ND, Dalrymple, Goettle and Dept. of Commerce) View
22 08/17/2011 DISK - AEB (State of ND, Dalrymple, Goettle and Dept. of Commerce)
23 08/18/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF (Minot City Council & The City of Minot) View
24 08/18/2011 E-FILED BRIEF - AEB (Minot City Council & The City of Minot)
25 08/18/2011 APPELLEE APPENDIX - (Minot City Council & The City of Minot)
26 08/18/2011 E-FILED APPENDIX - AEA (Minot City Council & The City of Minot)
27 08/19/2011 Rec'd $25 AEB (Minot) e-file surcharge. (receipt no. 20622)
28 08/19/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF (MADC) View
29 08/19/2011 E-FILED BRIEF - AEB (MADC)
30 08/22/2011 Rec'd $25.00 AEB (MADC) e-file surcharge. (receipt no. 20627)
31 08/22/2011 Rec'd 7 copies of AEB (Minot City Council & The City of Minot) from Central Duplicating.
32 08/22/2011 Rec'd 6 copies of AEA (Minot City Council & The City of Minot) from Central Duplicating.
33 08/23/2011 Rec'd 7 copies of AEB (MADC) from Central Duplicating.
34 09/01/2011 REPLY BRIEF (e-filed) PDF View
35 09/01/2011 E-FILED BRIEF (RYB) PDF
36 09/08/2011 Received 7 copies of RYB from Central Duplicating.
37 10/05/2011 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
38 10/26/2011 Request for Radio/TV Coverage (Dale Wetzel from Associated Press) approved
39 10/28/2011 Request for Radio/TV Coverage (Prairie Public) approved
40 11/03/2011 APPEARANCES: Lynn M. Boughey; Douglas A. Bahr;Randall J. Bakke; Bryan L. Van Grinsven
41 11/03/2011 ARGUED: Lynn M. Boughey; Douglas A. Bahr;Randall J. Bakke; Bryan L. Van Grinsven
42 11/03/2011 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
43 07/12/2012 DISPOSITION
44 07/12/2012 UNANIMOUS OPINION : Crothers, Daniel John View
45 07/12/2012 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellees
46 07/13/2012 Judgment Sent to Parties
47 08/14/2012 MANDATE
48 08/17/2012 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
49 10/18/2012 Notice from U.S. Supreme Court that Petition for Writ of Certiorari was filed and placed on docket
50 01/10/2013 Notice from U.S. Supreme Court that Petition for Writ of Certiorari is denied