Search Tips

Rickert v. Dakota Sanitation Plus, et al.

Docket No. 20110158
Oral Argument: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 10:30am

Docket Info

Title
Mark Rickert, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Dakota Sanitation Plus, Inc.,
a North Dakota Corporation, and
Peggy Becker, individually, as
a director of Dakota Sanitation
Plus, Inc., and as an officer of
Dakota Sanitation Plus, Inc., Defendants and Appellants
Case Type
CIVIL APPEAL : CORPORATIONS
Appeal From
Case No. 09-C-00022
South Central Judicial District, Morton County
Donald L. Jorgensen
2012 ND 37812 N.W.2d 413
Oral Argument 10/26/2011

Highlight

For partial performance rto emove an unwritten agreement from the statute of frauds, the part performance must be consistent only with the existence of the alleged oral contract.
Unlike Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2)(A), which requires automatic disclosure of an expert witness's report, N.D.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(4) requires that the opposing party specifically request disclosure of the facts and opinions to which the expert will testify and the grounds for each opinion.
The intent of the dissenting shareholder provisions in N.D.C.C. ch. 10-19.1 is to provide the fair value of shares to a dissenting shareholder as it existed immediately before the triggering event, and changes in economic circumstances occurring after the triggering event which affect the value of the shares are irrelevant.


Briefs

Filing Date Description
07/27/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF View
07/28/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed) PDF View

Counsel

Party Type Name
APPELLANT PRIVATE PRACTICE Robert V Bolinske - 03266
APPELLEE PRIVATE PRACTICE David Del Schweigert - 05123
APPELLEE PRIVATE PRACTICE Ariston Edward Johnson - 06366

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. # Filing Date Description Attachment
1 05/31/2011 NOTICE OF APPEAL : 05/31/2011
2 05/31/2011 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 05/31/2011
3 06/13/2011 LETTER FROM JOYCE HARNDEN, COURT REPORTER INDICATING NO TRA FORTHCOMING-PREVIOUSLY FILED & IN ROA.
4 06/13/2011 ACTION BY CLERK (MAT) per court reporter, no tra forthcoming. - Granted : 07/10/2011
5 06/23/2011 MOTION FOR REMAND
6 06/24/2011 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - Granted
7 06/24/2011 ORDER OF REMAND
8 06/24/2011 Order/Judgment Sent to Parties
9 07/11/2011 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (Letter dated 7/11/11 from Robert Bolinske
10 07/11/2011 ACTION BY CLERK - Granted : 07/25/2011
11 07/19/2011 APPELLANT APPENDIX
12 07/27/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF View
13 07/27/2011 DISK-ATB (FLASH DRIVE)
14 07/28/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed) PDF View
15 07/28/2011 E-FILED BRIEF (AEB) PDF
16 07/28/2011 APPELLEE APPENDIX (e-filed)
17 07/28/2011 E-FILED APPENDIX (AEA)
18 07/29/2011 Received $25 e-filing surcharge for AEB (Receipt #20585).
19 08/02/2011 Received 7 copies of AEB from Central Duplicating.
20 08/02/2011 Received 6 copies of AEA from Central Duplicating.
21 09/01/2011 Electronic RECORD ON APPEAL (Image Nos. 1-173)
22 09/02/2011 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
23 10/26/2011 APPEARANCES: Robert V. Bolinske/Ariston E. Johnson & David D. Schweigert
24 10/26/2011 ARGUED: Bolinske/Johnson
25 10/26/2011 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
26 02/17/2012 DISPOSITION
27 02/17/2012 UNANIMOUS OPINION : Kapsner, Carol Ronning View
28 02/17/2012 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellee.
29 02/21/2012 Judgment Sent to Parties
30 03/29/2012 MANDATE
31 07/01/2021 EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed