Rickert v. Dakota Sanitation Plus, et al.
Docket Info
- Title
- Mark Rickert, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Dakota Sanitation Plus, Inc.,
a North Dakota Corporation, and
Peggy Becker, individually, as
a director of Dakota Sanitation
Plus, Inc., and as an officer of
Dakota Sanitation Plus, Inc., Defendants and Appellants - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : CORPORATIONS
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 09-C-00022
South Central Judicial District, Morton County
Donald L. Jorgensen
Highlight
For partial performance rto emove an unwritten agreement from the statute of frauds, the part performance must be consistent only with the existence of the alleged oral contract.
Unlike Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2)(A), which requires automatic disclosure of an expert witness's report, N.D.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(4) requires that the opposing party specifically request disclosure of the facts and opinions to which the expert will testify and the grounds for each opinion.
The intent of the dissenting shareholder provisions in N.D.C.C. ch. 10-19.1 is to provide the fair value of shares to a dissenting shareholder as it existed immediately before the triggering event, and changes in economic circumstances occurring after the triggering event which affect the value of the shares are irrelevant.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 05/31/2011 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 05/31/2011 | |
2 | 05/31/2011 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 05/31/2011 | |
3 | 06/13/2011 | LETTER FROM JOYCE HARNDEN, COURT REPORTER INDICATING NO TRA FORTHCOMING-PREVIOUSLY FILED & IN ROA. | |
4 | 06/13/2011 | ACTION BY CLERK (MAT) per court reporter, no tra forthcoming. - Granted : 07/10/2011 | |
5 | 06/23/2011 | MOTION FOR REMAND | |
6 | 06/24/2011 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - Granted | |
7 | 06/24/2011 | ORDER OF REMAND | |
8 | 06/24/2011 | Order/Judgment Sent to Parties | |
9 | 07/11/2011 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (Letter dated 7/11/11 from Robert Bolinske | |
10 | 07/11/2011 | ACTION BY CLERK - Granted : 07/25/2011 | |
11 | 07/19/2011 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | |
12 | 07/27/2011 | APPELLANT BRIEF | View |
13 | 07/27/2011 | DISK-ATB (FLASH DRIVE) | |
14 | 07/28/2011 | APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed) PDF | View |
15 | 07/28/2011 | E-FILED BRIEF (AEB) PDF | |
16 | 07/28/2011 | APPELLEE APPENDIX (e-filed) | |
17 | 07/28/2011 | E-FILED APPENDIX (AEA) | |
18 | 07/29/2011 | Received $25 e-filing surcharge for AEB (Receipt #20585). | |
19 | 08/02/2011 | Received 7 copies of AEB from Central Duplicating. | |
20 | 08/02/2011 | Received 6 copies of AEA from Central Duplicating. | |
21 | 09/01/2011 | Electronic RECORD ON APPEAL (Image Nos. 1-173) | |
22 | 09/02/2011 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
23 | 10/26/2011 | APPEARANCES: Robert V. Bolinske/Ariston E. Johnson & David D. Schweigert | |
24 | 10/26/2011 | ARGUED: Bolinske/Johnson | |
25 | 10/26/2011 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
26 | 02/17/2012 | DISPOSITION | |
27 | 02/17/2012 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : Kapsner, Carol Ronning | View |
28 | 02/17/2012 | Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellee. | |
29 | 02/21/2012 | Judgment Sent to Parties | |
30 | 03/29/2012 | MANDATE | |
31 | 07/01/2021 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |