Fetzer v. Workforce Safety and Insurance
Docket No. 20110251
Oral Argument:
Monday, December 19, 2011 2:45pm
Docket Info
- Title
- Beverly Fetzer, Appellant
v.
North Dakota Workforce Safety
and Insurance, Appellee - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : WORKERS COMPENSATION
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 2011-CV-00067
South Central Judicial District, McLean County
Bruce B. Haskell
2012 ND 73815 N.W.2d 539
Oral Argument
12/19/2011
Highlight
Claimants for workers' compensation benefits must prove a causal connection between their employment and injury.
The positional-risk doctrine is rejected because it negates the necessity of proving causation.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 09/01/2011 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 08/31/2011 | |
2 | 09/06/2011 | E-mail from Ms. Anderson indicating no adm. tra. will be filed as there is not one. | |
3 | 09/26/2011 | APPELLANT BRIEF - EFB | View |
4 | 09/26/2011 | E-FILED BRIEF - ATB | |
5 | 09/26/2011 | APPELLANT APPENDIX - EFA | |
6 | 09/26/2011 | E-FILED APPENDIX - ATA | |
7 | 09/27/2011 | Rec'd $25.00 for ATB e-file surcharge. (receipt no. 20682) | |
8 | 10/03/2011 | ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL (entry nos. 1-21) | |
9 | 10/06/2011 | Rec'd corrected cover pages for ATB & ATA. (e-mail) | |
10 | 10/07/2011 | Rec'd 7 copies ATB from Central Duplicating. | |
11 | 10/07/2011 | Rec'd 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating. | |
12 | 10/21/2011 | APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed) | View |
13 | 10/21/2011 | E-FILED BRIEF (AEB) | |
14 | 10/24/2011 | Received $25 surcharge for AEB (Receipt #20724) | |
15 | 10/25/2011 | Received 7 copies of AEB from CSD | |
16 | 11/02/2011 | REPLY BRIEF (e-filed) PDF | View |
17 | 11/02/2011 | E-FILED BRIEF (RYB) PDF | |
18 | 11/07/2011 | Received 7 copies or RYB from Central Duplicating. | |
19 | 11/16/2011 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
20 | 12/19/2011 | APPEARANCES: Dean Haas/Jacqueline Anderson | |
21 | 12/19/2011 | ARGUED: Haas/Anderson | |
22 | 12/19/2011 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
23 | 04/10/2012 | DISPOSITION | |
24 | 04/10/2012 | SPLIT OPINION : Kapsner, Carol Ronning | View |
25 | 04/10/2012 | (DISSENTING) : Maring, Mary Muehlen | |
26 | 04/10/2012 | No costs taxed on appeal taxed N.D.C.C.§65-10-03 | |
27 | 04/11/2012 | Judgment E-Mailed to Parties | |
28 | 04/25/2012 | PETITION FOR REHEARING | View |
29 | 04/25/2012 | E-FILED BRIEF | |
30 | 04/25/2012 | Copies made by this office | |
31 | 05/03/2012 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - Denied | |
32 | 05/03/2012 | (NOTE: MMM would have granted the PER) | |
33 | 05/14/2012 | MANDATE | |
34 | 08/24/2021 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |