Search Tips

State of N.D., et al. v. N.D. Insurance Reserve Fund

Docket No. 20110368
Oral Argument: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 10:45am

Docket Info

Title
State of North Dakota by and through
the Department of Human Services and its
Child Support Enforcement Division, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
North Dakota Insurance Reserve Fund, Respondent and Appellee
Case Type
CIVIL APPEAL : OTHER (Civil)
Appeal From
Case No. 11-C-00529
South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Bruce A. Romanick
2012 ND 216822 N.W.2d 038
Oral Argument 5/30/2012

Highlight

The statutory procedure authorizing a proceeding to enforce an administrative subpoena in district court, is a special proceeding, and an order denying an application for enforcement of an administrative subpoena is appealable.
The particular controls general rule of statutory construction applies only when the conflict between two statutory provisions is irreconcilable.
The Department of Human Services was statutorily authorized to issue an administrative subpoena to the North Dakota Insurance Reserve Fund seeking information relevant to child support enforcement.


Briefs

Filing Date Description
03/02/2012 APPELLANT BRIEF View
04/04/2012 APPELLEE BRIEF View
04/19/2012 REPLY BRIEF View

Counsel

Party Type Name
APPELLEE PRIVATE PRACTICE Gary R Thune - 03196
APPELLEE PRIVATE PRACTICE Tiffany Johnson Vinje - 06147
APPELLANT ATT. GENERAL OFFICE Sheila K Keller - 04509

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. # Filing Date Description Attachment
1 12/19/2011 NOTICE OF APPEAL : 12/15/2011
2 12/19/2011 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 12/15/2011
3 01/04/2012 Court requested that the parties address appealability in briefs on the merits
4 01/06/2012 Rec'd IDB $125 filing fee.
5 01/06/2012 Rec'd IDB $25 ATB surcharge.
6 01/09/2012 Electronic RECORD ON APPEAL dated January 6, 2012 (entry nos. 1-23).
7 01/25/2012 TRANSCRIPT DATED SEPTEMBER 26, 2012, & C.O.S.
8 01/25/2012 DISK-TRA (9/26/12) E-MAILED
9 03/02/2012 APPELLANT BRIEF View
10 03/02/2012 DISK - ATB (e-mailed)
11 03/02/2012 APPELLANT APPENDIX
12 04/04/2012 APPELLEE BRIEF View
13 04/04/2012 E-FILED BRIEF
14 04/05/2012 Received $25 e-filing surcharge for AEB
15 04/10/2012 Received 7 copies of AEB from Central Duplicating.
16 04/11/2012 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
17 04/19/2012 REPLY BRIEF View
18 04/19/2012 DISK - ryb (e-mailed)
19 04/23/2012 MOT. EXT/TIME REPLY BRIEF
20 04/23/2012 E-FILED MOTION
21 04/24/2012 NO ACTION TAKEN
22 05/30/2012 APPEARANCES: Sheila Keller/Tiffany Johnson and Gary Thune
23 05/30/2012 ARGUED: Keller/Johnson
24 05/30/2012 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
25 10/23/2012 DISPOSITION
26 10/23/2012 UNANIMOUS OPINION : Maring, Mary Muehlen View
27 10/23/2012 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of Appellant
28 10/24/2012 Judgment E-Mailed to Parties
29 11/28/2012 MANDATE
30 11/29/2012 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
31 08/05/2021 EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed