Coppage v. State
Docket No. 20120267
Oral Argument:
Thursday, November 29, 2012 11:00am
Docket Info
- Title
- Ernest Coppage, Petitioner, Appellee
and Cross-Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent, Appellant
and Cross-Appellee - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : POST-CONVICTION RELIEF
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 06-K-02085
South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Donald L. Jorgensen
2013 ND 10826 N.W.2d 320
Oral Argument
11/29/2012
Highlight
N.D.R.Ev. 609 governs the admission of evidence of certain criminal convictions for the purpose of attacking a witness's general character for truthfulness. Rule 609 does not apply to the admission of evidence of a prior conviction for purposes of impeachment by contradiction.
Evidence that is otherwise inadmissible, may be admitted if the opposing party opens the door through his testimony and invites any error.
A district court is required to follow the pronouncement of any appellate court on legal issues in subsequent proceedings and to carry out the appellate court's mandate according to its terms.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 06/08/2012 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 06/06/2012 | |
2 | 06/08/2012 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 06/07/2012 | |
3 | 06/21/2012 | NOTICE OF CROSS APPEAL (cross appeal filed 6/20/12) | |
4 | 07/09/2012 | ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED 07/06/2012 (ENTRY NOS.1-43, 47-51, 55-164) | |
5 | 07/09/2012 | Items not sent 44-46- Exhibits, and 52-54-Court Reporter notes | |
6 | 07/25/2012 | TRANSCRIPT DATED 04/20/2012 & C.O.S. | |
7 | 07/25/2012 | DISK-Transcript dated 04/20/12 (e-mailed) | |
8 | 08/31/2012 | APPELLANT BRIEF | View |
9 | 08/31/2012 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | |
10 | 08/31/2012 | DISK-ATB (e-mailed) | |
11 | 09/07/2012 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF (adjusted sua sponte due to service of ATB date) | |
12 | 09/07/2012 | ACTION BY CLERK (adjusted sua sponte due to service of ATB date) - Granted : 10/04/2012 | |
13 | 09/07/2012 | 8 correct cover pages for ATB & C.O.S. | |
14 | 10/03/2012 | APPELLEE BRIEF | View |
15 | 10/03/2012 | E-FILED BRIEF | |
16 | 10/08/2012 | Received 7 copies of AEB from CSD | |
17 | 10/12/2012 | REPLY BRIEF | View |
18 | 10/18/2012 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
19 | 10/19/2012 | Received 8 copies each of cover in gray & table of contents for RYB | |
20 | 10/23/2012 | DISK-RYB (E-MAILED) | |
21 | 10/24/2012 | MOT. EXT/TIME CROSS APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF | |
22 | 10/24/2012 | ACTION BY CLERK - Granted : 11/13/2012 | |
23 | 10/25/2012 | The State does not object to extension of Cross Appellant's Reply Brief | |
24 | 11/06/2012 | E-filing surcharge for AEB paid through inter-departmental billing | |
25 | 11/08/2012 | REPLY BRIEF of Cross-Appellant | View |
26 | 11/08/2012 | E-FILED BRIEF (RYB of cross/appellant) | |
27 | 11/13/2012 | Received 7 cc of RYB of Cross-Appellant from Central Duplicating | |
28 | 11/29/2012 | APPEARANCES: Lloyd C. Suhr; Monty G. Mertz | |
29 | 11/29/2012 | ARGUED: Lloyd C. Suhr; Monty G. Mertz | |
30 | 11/29/2012 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
31 | 01/23/2013 | DISPOSITION | |
32 | 01/23/2013 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : VandeWalle, Gerald W. | View |
33 | 01/24/2013 | Judgment Sent to Parties | |
34 | 02/21/2013 | MANDATE | |
35 | 02/26/2013 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE | |
36 | 09/29/2021 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |