Search Tips

Dieterle v. Dieterle

Docket No. 20120329
Oral Argument: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 2:45pm

Docket Info

Title
Shannon R. Dieterle, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Angela L. Dieterle, Defendant and Appellant
Case Type
CIVIL APPEAL : CHILD CUST & SUPPORT (Div.\Other)
Appeal From
Case No. 2011-DM-00021
South Central Judicial District, Sheridan County
Donald L. Jorgensen
2013 ND 71830 N.W.2d 571
Oral Argument 2/20/2013

Highlight

A district court need not make separate findings of fact for each of the best-interest factors, a court's findings regarding one factor may be applicable to another factor, and a court need not consider irrelevant factors in its decision on primary residential responsibility for a child.
Allowing neutral individuals to resolve disputes between the parties, so long as access by the parties to the district court is allowed for ultimate resolution of the dispute, is not an improper delegation of judicial power.
Adverse rulings alone are not evidence of judicial bias or partiality.
Appellate briefs must contain references to the evidentiary record supporting statements of disputed facts.


Briefs

Filing Date Description
12/12/2012 APPELLANT BRIEF (pdf) View
01/10/2013 APPELLEE BRIEF View
01/25/2013 REPLY BRIEF (pdf) View

Counsel

Party Type Name
APPELLANT PRIVATE PRACTICE Lynn M Boughey - 04046
APPELLEE PRIVATE PRACTICE Rodney Ervin Pagel - 05090

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. # Filing Date Description Attachment
1 08/21/2012 NOTICE OF APPEAL : 08/20/2012
2 08/22/2012 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 08/22/2012
3 08/28/2012 Acknowledgment of Order for Transcript from Joyce Harnden
4 10/04/2012 ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED 10/03/2012 (ENTRY NOS.1-319)
5 10/09/2012 AMENDED ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED 10/08/2012 (ENTRY NOS.1-2, 5-321)(ENTRY NOS. 3 & 4 deleted)
6 10/10/2012 TRANSCRIPTS DATED April 5, 2012; June 19, 2012; and June 20, 2012 & C.O.S.
7 10/10/2012 DISK - TRA April 5, 2012; June 19, 2012; June 20, 2012
8 10/12/2012 TRANSCRIPT DATED October 19, 2011, and December 20, 2011 & C.O.S.
9 10/12/2012 DISK - TRA October 19, 2011, and December 20, 2011
10 11/16/2012 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF
11 11/16/2012 E-FILED MOTION
12 11/16/2012 No objection to Mot. Ext./Time Appellant Brief from Appellee's counsel
13 11/16/2012 ACTION BY CLERK (w/understanding OA will be held February 2013) - Granted : 12/12/2012
14 12/12/2012 APPELLANT BRIEF (pdf) View
15 12/12/2012 E-FILED BRIEF (pdf)
16 12/12/2012 APPELLANT APPENDIX
17 12/12/2012 E-FILED APPENDIX
18 12/13/2012 Received $25.00 e-filing surcharge for Appellant's Brief and $59.50 for Appendix (receipt #21616)
19 12/28/2012 Received nonsubstantive changes to ATB and ATA
20 01/03/2013 Received 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating
21 01/03/2013 Received 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating
22 01/04/2013 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF (sua sponte)
23 01/04/2013 ACTION BY CLERK (sua sponte) : 01/15/2013
24 01/09/2013 Received changes to ATB (statement of facts)
25 01/10/2013 APPELLEE BRIEF View
26 01/14/2013 Received 7 copies of ATB (with corrected statement of facts) from CSD
27 01/18/2013 Received corrections to AEB (Footnotes & TOA)
28 01/18/2013 DISK (AEB)(e-mailed)
29 01/23/2013 ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED 11/21/12 (ENTRY NOS. 349-385)
30 01/23/2013 2nd ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED 11/21/12 (ENTRY NOS. 386-388)
31 01/23/2013 3rd ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED 1/22/13 (ENTRY NOS. 389-398)
32 01/23/2013 4th ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED 1/23/13 (ENTRY NOS. 321-348, 399)
33 01/24/2013 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
34 01/25/2013 REPLY BRIEF (pdf) View
35 01/25/2013 E-FILED BRIEF
36 01/25/2013 Supplemental APPELLANT APPENDIX
37 01/25/2013 E-FILED APPENDIX
38 01/28/2013 received 7 copies of RYB from CSD
39 01/28/2013 received 6 copies of Supplemental Appendix from CSD
40 01/25/2013 Appellant's Motion and Brief to Require Appellee to Comply with N.D.R.App.P. 28
41 01/25/2013 E-FILED MOTION
42 01/28/2013 Clerk directed to advise counsel the Motion filed 1/25/2013 will be considered
43 02/01/2013 Appellant's Motion and Brief in Support of Motion for Stay of Judgment
44 02/01/2013 E-FILED MOTION
45 02/01/2013 ACTION BY ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SANDSTROM - Denied
46 02/07/2013 RESPONSE to Motion to Require Appellee to Comply with N.D.R.App.P. 28
47 02/15/2013 Reply to Motion to Require Appellee to Comply with N.D.R.App.P. 28
48 02/15/2013 EFILED REPLY
49 02/19/2013 Rec'd non-substantive corrected page for Reply to Motion to Require Appellee to Comply with Rule 28
50 02/20/2013 ARGUED: Lynn M. Boughey; Rodney E. Pagel
51 02/20/2013 APPEARANCES: Lynn M. Boughey; Rodney E. Pagel
52 02/20/2013 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
53 04/04/2013 Appellant's Motion and Brief in Support of Motion for Stay of Judgment
54 04/04/2013 E-FILED MOTION
55 04/10/2013 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - Denied
56 05/14/2013 NO ACTION TAKEN - Motion to Require Appellee to Comply with N.D.R.App.P. 28
57 05/14/2013 DISPOSITION
58 05/14/2013 UNANIMOUS OPINION : Kapsner, Carol Ronning View
59 05/14/2013 Concur in the result : Crothers, Daniel John
60 05/14/2013 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of Appellee
61 06/13/2013 MANDATE
62 06/20/2013 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE