Bell, et al. v. Pro Tune Plus, et al.
- Bobby Bell and Heidi Roberson, Plaintiffs
Bobby Bell, Appellant
Pro Tune Plus and Patrick Riepl, Defendants and Appellees
- Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : CONTRACTS
- Appeal From
Case No. 2012-CV-00881
South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
David E. Reich
A district court does not have the authority to remand an action properly removed from the small claims court.
A plaintiff has standing to appeal an order of remand to small claims court because the rights afforded in the district court vested in both parties immediately upon removal.
An order of remand to small claims court is not analogous to a traditional dismissal without prejudice, because a procedural barrier exists to prevent the case being filed again in the district court.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
|Seq. #||Filing Date||Description||Attachment|
|1||02/28/2013||NOTICE OF APPEAL : 02/28/2013|
|2||03/27/2013||ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED MARCH 26, 2013(ENTRY NOS.1-49)|
|3||04/09/2013||APPELLANT BRIEF (PDF)||View|
|4||04/09/2013||E-FILED BRIEF (PDF)|
|7||04/10/2013||Rcv'd $25 surcharge for ATB (receipt #21790)|
|8||04/16/2013||Rcv'd nonsubstantive corrections to ATB & ATA (title and paragraph mis-numbered)|
|9||04/17/2013||Rcv'd 7 copies of ATB and 6 copies of ATA from CSD|
|12||05/09/2013||Rcv'd $25 surcharge for AEB (receipt #21843)|
|13||05/10/2013||Rcv'd 7 copies of AEB from CSD|
|14||05/16/2013||NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT|
|17||05/28/2013||Received 7 cc of RYB from Central Duplicating|
|18||06/10/2013||APPEARANCES: Rebecca Lynn Binstock; Christopher S. Pieske|
|19||06/10/2013||ARGUED: Rebecca Lynn Binstock; Christopher S. Pieske|
|20||06/10/2013||ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST|
|22||08/29/2013||UNANIMOUS OPINION : VandeWalle, Gerald W.||View|
|23||08/29/2013||Costs on appeal taxed in favor of Appellant|
|24||08/30/2013||Judgment Sent to Parties|