Search Tips

State v. Harns

Docket No. 20140236
Oral Argument: Monday, December 22, 2014 4:00pm

Docket Info

Title
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Christopher David Harns, Defendant and Appellant
Case Type
CRIMINAL APPEAL : DUI/DUS
Appeal From
Case No. 2013-CR-00308
Southwest Judicial District, Dunn County
William A. Herauf
2016 ND 184885 N.W.2d 63
2015 ND 45861 N.W.2d 173

Highlight

Driving under the influence conviction is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).


Briefs

Filing Date Description
09/09/2014 APPELLANT BRIEF View
09/22/2014 APPELLEE BRIEF View
10/09/2014 REPLY BRIEF View

Counsel

Party Type Name
APPELLEE STATE'S ATTORNEY Pat J. Merriman - 07453
APPELLANT PRIVATE PRACTICE Thomas F. Murtha - 06984

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. # Filing Date Description Attachment
1 07/02/2014 NOTICE OF APPEAL : 07/02/2014
2 07/02/2014 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 07/02/2014
3 07/31/2014 TRANSCRIPT DATED MARCH 11, 2014, & C.O.S.
4 08/04/2014 ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED AUGUST 1, 2014 (ENTRY NOS.1-34)
5 08/06/2014 DISK-TRA (3/11/14) E-MAILED
6 09/09/2014 APPELLANT BRIEF View
7 09/09/2014 E-FILED BRIEF
8 09/09/2014 APPELLANT APPENDIX
9 09/09/2014 E-FILED APPENDIX
10 09/12/2014 Rcv'd $25 e-filing surcharge for ATB (receipt #23022)
11 09/18/2014 Rcv'd non-substantive corrections to ATB (NW cite)
12 09/24/2014 Rcv'd 7 copies of ATB & 6 copies of ATA from CSD
13 09/22/2014 APPELLEE BRIEF View
14 09/22/2014 DISK(AEB)(e-mailed)
15 09/25/2014 Rcv'd c.o.s. of non-substantive corrections to aeb
16 09/29/2014 Rcv'd non-substantive corrections to AEB
17 10/09/2014 REPLY BRIEF View
18 10/09/2014 E-FILED BRIEF
19 10/14/2014 Rcv'd 7 copies of RYB from CSD
20 11/10/2014 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
21 12/08/2014 S.CT. DETERMINED ORAL ARGUMENT NOT NECESSARY
22 12/22/2014 APPEARANCES: Waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(a)(2)
23 12/22/2014 ARGUED: Waived
24 02/25/2015 INTERIM DISPOSITION (AFFIRMED BY SUMMARY DISPOSITION) View
25 02/25/2015 UNANIMOUS OPINION : Per Curiam View
26 02/26/2015 Judgment Sent to Parties
27 03/10/2015 PETITION FOR REHEARING View
28 03/10/2015 E-FILED BRIEF
29 03/11/2015 Rcv'd 7 copies of PER from CSD
30 03/24/2015 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (petition for rehearing) - Denied
31 04/08/2015 MANDATE
32 04/09/2015 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
33 06/26/2015 Notice of Filing Petition for Writ of Certiorari to U.S. Supreme Court
34 07/06/2016 Writ of Certiorari is granted; judgment is vacated and case is remanded to N.D. Supreme Court
35 06/30/2016 U.S. Supreme Court Opinion
36 06/30/2016 U.S. Supreme Court Summary Dispositions
37 08/01/2016 Mandate issued by U.S. Supreme Court
38 09/15/2016 DISPOSITION
39 09/15/2016 UNANIMOUS OPINION : Per Curiam View
40 09/15/2016 COSTS ON APPEAL TO APPELLANT TO RECOVER $300 FROM THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA UNDER THE MANDATE OF
41 09/15/2016 THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
42 09/16/2016 Amended Judgment Sent to Parties
43 09/29/2016 MANDATE