State v. Bailey
Docket No. 20160351
Oral Argument:
Tuesday, May 30, 2017 4:00 PM
Docket Info
- Title
- State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Precious Bailey, Defendant and Appellant - Case Type
- CRIMINAL APPEAL : DRUGS/CONTRABAND
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 2015-CR-02217
North Central Judicial District, Ward County
Todd L. Cresap
2017 ND 143895 N.W.2d 753
Highlight
In determining "corroborating circumstances" under N.D.R.Ev. 804(b)(3), the district court may analyze both the credibility of the in-court witness and the reliability of the out-of-court declarant.
A district court's analysis of whether "corroborating circumstances" indicate the trustworthiness of the statement is a preliminary determination regarding the admissibility of the evidence.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 10/20/2016 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 10/20/2016 | |
2 | 10/20/2016 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 10/20/2016 | |
3 | 10/20/2016 | NOT. OF FILING NOT. OF APPEAL AND PROOF OF SERV. | |
4 | 10/20/2016 | Notice served on Ashley M. Gulke and Caitlyn A. Pierson | |
5 | 11/16/2016 | ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED NOVEMBER 15, 2016 (ENTRY NOS.1-72, 74, 76-91)Item not sent: 73, 75 | |
6 | 12/05/2016 | Not. Assign. of Counsel by Samuel Gereszek. Do not cont. to copy Ashley Gulke any further. | |
7 | 12/23/2016 | MOT. EXT/TIME TRANSCRIPT | |
8 | 12/23/2016 | E-FILED MOTION | |
9 | 12/23/2016 | ACTION BY TRIAL COURT - Granted : 01/08/2017 | |
10 | 01/18/2017 | MOT. EXT/TIME TRANSCRIPT | |
11 | 01/18/2017 | E-FILED MOTION | |
12 | 01/18/2017 | ACTION BY TRIAL COURT - Granted : 02/17/2017 | |
13 | 02/08/2017 | ELECTRONIC TRANSCRIPT DATED April 14, 2016, October 19, 2016 & C.O.S. | |
14 | 02/08/2017 | ELECTRONIC TRANSCRIPT DATED October 14, 2016 & C.O.S. | |
15 | 02/15/2017 | Rec'd corrected transcript cover page for date of transcript (10-12-16) | |
16 | 02/17/2017 | ELECTRONIC TRANSCRIPT DATED OCTOBER 12, 2016 & C.O.S. | |
17 | 03/20/2017 | APPELLANT BRIEF (PDF) | View |
18 | 03/20/2017 | E-FILED BRIEF (PDF) | |
19 | 03/20/2017 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | |
20 | 03/20/2017 | E-FILED APPENDIX | |
21 | 03/21/2017 | Rec'd 6 copies of ATB and 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating | |
22 | 03/27/2017 | Rec'd $25 e-filing surcharge for ATB (receipt #25158) | |
23 | 04/13/2017 | APPELLEE BRIEF (PDF) | View |
24 | 04/13/2017 | E-FILED BRIEF (PDF) | |
25 | 04/18/2017 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
26 | 04/17/2017 | Rec'd 6 copies of AEB from CSD | |
27 | 04/20/2017 | Rec'd $25 e-filing surcharge for AEB (receipt #25204) | |
28 | 04/27/2017 | REQUEST TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT ON BEHALF OF APPELLANT | |
29 | 04/27/2017 | E-FILED MOTION | |
30 | 05/01/2017 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - Granted | |
31 | 05/01/2017 | S.CT. DETERMINED ORAL ARGUMENT NOT NECESSARY ON BEHALF OF APPELLEE | |
32 | 05/30/2017 | APPEARANCES: Waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f) and 34(a)(2) | |
33 | 05/30/2017 | ARGUED: Waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f) and 34(a)(2) | |
34 | 06/07/2017 | DISPOSITION | |
35 | 06/07/2017 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : Crothers, Daniel John | View |
36 | 06/08/2017 | Judgment Sent to Parties | |
37 | 07/10/2017 | MANDATE | |
38 | 08/12/2022 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |