State v. Romanick, et al.
Docket No. 20160455
Oral Argument:
Tuesday, February 21, 2017 11:00am
Docket Info
- Title
- State of North Dakota, Petitioner
v.
The Honorable Lolita G. Hartl Romanick,
Judge of the District Court, Northwest
Judicial District, and Steven Kukowski, Respondents - Case Type
- CRIMINAL ORIG. PROCEEDING : WRIT OF SUPERVISION (Crim.)
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 2016-CR-00333
North Central Judicial District, Ward County
Lolita G. Hartl Romanick
2017 ND 42890 N.W.2d 803
Oral Argument
2/21/2017
Highlight
A supervisory writ is issued rarely and cautiously only to rectify errors and prevent injustice in extraordinary cases when no adequate alternative remedy exists.
A criminal complaint may be amended at any time before a finding or verdict if no additional or different offense is charged and if substantial rights of the defendant are not prejudiced.
A date is an element of a criminal offense only if there would be no crime if the conduct occurred on the date alleged in the complaint.
Briefs
| Filing Date | Description | |
|---|---|---|
| 01/30/2017 | RESPONDENT BRIEF | View |
Counsel
| Party | Type | Name |
|---|---|---|
| RESPONDENT | PRIVATE PRACTICE | Drew James Hushka - 08230 |
| PETITIONER | STATE'S ATTORNEY | Seymour Robert Jordan - 07785 |
| RESPONDENT | PRIVATE PRACTICE | Mark Allan Friese - 05646 |
| RESPONDENT | DISTRICT JUDGE | Lolita G Hartl Romanick - 04042 |
| RESPONDENT | PRIVATE PRACTICE | Peter David Welte - 05403 |
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
| Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12/30/2016 | Motion and Brief in Support of Stay Pending Appeal | |
| 2 | 12/30/2016 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE - Granted | |
| 3 | 12/30/2016 | Order/Judgment Sent to Parties | |
| 4 | 12/30/2016 | ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION : Kapsner, Carol Ronning | |
| 5 | 01/10/2017 | PETITION FILED | View |
| 6 | 01/10/2017 | E-FILED PETITION | |
| 7 | 01/10/2017 | PETITIONER APPENDIX | |
| 8 | 01/10/2017 | E-FILED APPENDIX | |
| 9 | 01/11/2017 | Notice of Appearance by Matthew A. Sagsveen for Judge Romanick | |
| 10 | 01/17/2017 | Received payment for petitioner's brief e-filing surcharge (receipt #25022) | |
| 11 | 01/30/2017 | RESPONDENT BRIEF | View |
| 12 | 01/30/2017 | E-FILED BRIEF | |
| 13 | 01/30/2017 | RESPONDENT APPENDIX | |
| 14 | 01/30/2017 | E-FILED APPENDIX | |
| 15 | 02/01/2017 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
| 16 | 02/02/2017 | SITTING WITH THE COURT : Neumann, William A. | |
| 17 | 02/06/2017 | Received e-filing surcharge for respondents brief and appendix (Receipt #25071) | |
| 18 | 02/21/2017 | APPEARANCES: Jordan R. Seymour; Peter D. Welte; Mark A. Friese | |
| 19 | 02/21/2017 | ARGUED: Jordan R. Seymour; Peter D. Welte | |
| 20 | 02/21/2017 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
| 21 | 03/03/2017 | DISPOSITION | |
| 22 | 03/03/2017 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - Granted | |
| 23 | 03/03/2017 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : Crothers, Daniel John | View |
| 24 | 03/06/2017 | Judgment Sent to Parties |