State v. Palacio
Docket No. 20170180
Oral Argument:
Waived
Docket Info
- Title
- State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Juan Manuel Palacio, III, Defendant and Appellant - Case Type
- CRIMINAL APPEAL : DRUGS/CONTRABAND
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 2016-CR-01184
Southwest Judicial District, Stark County
Dann Edward Greenwood
2017 ND 273904 N.W.2d 41
Highlight
An appellant who fails to provide a trial transcript on appeal makes it impossible for the Court to conduct a meaningful and intelligent review of a claim of insufficiency of the evidence.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 05/11/2017 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 05/11/2017 | |
2 | 05/11/2017 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 05/12/2017 | |
3 | 05/11/2017 | **THIS CASE IS CONSOLIDATED W/20170181 Make all entries in this case except NOA, ROA, DIS & MAN | |
4 | 05/12/2017 | NOT. OF FILING NOT. OF APPEAL AND PROOF OF SERV. | |
5 | 05/12/2017 | Notice served on John D. Bruhn & Tom M. Henning | |
6 | 06/05/2017 | ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED JUNE 2, 2017 (ENTRY NOS.1-40, 43-44, & 46-63) | |
7 | 06/29/2017 | Samuel Gereszek appointed to represent Appellant. | |
8 | 07/11/2017 | MOT. EXT/TIME TRANSCRIPT | |
9 | 07/11/2017 | ACTION BY TRIAL COURT - Denied : 07/31/2017 | |
10 | 07/10/2017 | 1ST ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED JULY 7, 2017 (ENTRY NOS.64-67) | |
11 | 07/31/2017 | ELECTRONIC TRANSCRIPT DATED May 8, 2017 & C.O.S. | |
12 | 08/11/2017 | 2ND ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED AUGUST 10, 2017 (ENTRY NOS. 68-70) | |
13 | 09/11/2017 | APPELLANT BRIEF (PDF) | View |
14 | 09/11/2017 | E-FILED BRIEF (PDF) | |
15 | 09/11/2017 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | |
16 | 09/11/2017 | E-FILED APPENDIX | |
17 | 09/14/2017 | Received $25 ATB e-filing surcharge (Receipt #25492) | |
18 | 09/14/2017 | Received 6 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating | |
19 | 09/14/2017 | Received 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating | |
20 | 10/05/2017 | 3RD ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED OCTOBER 5, 2017 (ENTRY NOS.71-77) | |
21 | 10/11/2017 | APPELLEE BRIEF | View |
22 | 10/11/2017 | E-FILED BRIEF | |
23 | 10/12/2017 | Rec'd 6 copies of AEB from CD | |
24 | 10/13/2017 | Rec'd payment for e-filing surcharge for AEB (Receipt #25540) | |
25 | 10/17/2017 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
26 | 10/17/2017 | REQUEST TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLEE | |
27 | 10/17/2017 | E-FILED MOTION | |
28 | 10/18/2017 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - Granted | |
29 | 10/18/2017 | S.CT. DETERMINED ORAL ARGUMENT NOT NECESSARY | |
30 | 11/29/2017 | APPEARANCES: Waived for Appellee under N.D.R.App.P 34(f); for Appellant under 34(a)(2) | |
31 | 11/29/2017 | ARGUED: Waived for Appellee under N.D.R.App.P 34(f); for Appellant under 34(a)(2) | |
32 | 12/07/2017 | DISPOSITION | |
33 | 12/07/2017 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : Per Curiam | View |
34 | 12/08/2017 | Judgment Sent to Parties | |
35 | 01/04/2018 | MANDATE | |
36 | 01/03/2023 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |