Search Tips

State v. Lindeman

Docket No. 20210159
Oral Argument: Waived

Docket Info

Title
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Barry Mervyn Lindeman, Defendant and Appellant
Case Type
CRIMINAL APPEAL : SEXUAL OFFENSE
Appeal From
Case No. 2019-CR-02391
North Central Judicial District, Ward County
Douglas L. Mattson
2021 ND 220967 N.W.2d 796

Highlight

A precise time period is not required in a criminal prosecution unless time is an essential element of an offense.

Time is not an essential element of gross sexual imposition.


Briefs

Filing Date Description
09/17/2021 APPELLANT BRIEF (non-substantive corrections to brief signed September 20, 2021) View
09/22/2021 APPELLEE BRIEF View

Counsel

Party Type Name
APPELLANT COURT APPOINTED Samuel A. Gereszek - 07040
APPELLEE ASST. STATE'S ATTORNEY Christopher W. Nelson - 08708

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. # Filing Date Description Attachment
1 06/01/2021 NOTICE OF APPEAL : 06/01/2021
2 06/01/2021 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 06/07/2021
3 06/02/2021 NOT. OF FILING NOT. OF APPEAL AND PROOF OF SERV.
4 06/02/2021 Notice served on Kyle R. Craig & Christopher W. Nelson
5 06/04/2021 Samuel A. Gereszek appointed to represent Appellant.
6 06/29/2021 ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED JUNE 28, 2021 (ENTRY NOS. 1-87, 90-106)(NOT SENT: 88 & 89)
7 07/09/2021 ELECTRONIC TRANSCRIPT DATED JANUARY 11-13, 2021
8 07/09/2021 Certificate of Service for Transcript
9 08/17/2021 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF
10 08/17/2021 ACTION BY CLERK - Granted : 09/17/2021
11 09/17/2021 APPELLANT BRIEF (non-substantive corrections to brief signed September 20, 2021) View
12 09/17/2021 APPELLANT APPENDIX
13 09/20/2021 Oral Argument Request by Appellant
14 09/22/2021 Rec'd non-substantive corrections to ATB
15 09/22/2021 APPELLEE BRIEF View
16 09/22/2021 APPELLEE APPENDIX
17 09/22/2021 Oral Argument Request by Appellee
18 09/28/2021 Rec'd 4 copies of ATB & 3 copies of ATA from CSD
19 09/28/2021 Rec'd 4 copies of AEB & 3 copies of AEA from CSD
20 10/13/2021 S.CT. DETERMINED ORAL ARGUMENT NOT NECESSARY
21 11/17/2021 APPEARANCES: Waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(a)(1)(e)
22 11/17/2021 ARGUED: Waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(a)(1)(e)
23 12/09/2021 DISPOSITION
24 12/09/2021 UNANIMOUS OPINION : Per Curiam View
25 12/09/2021 Judgment View
26 01/03/2022 MANDATE