Larson v. WSI
Docket No. 20210333
Oral Argument:
Wednesday, March 9, 2022 2:45 PM
Docket Info
- Title
- Christine Larson, Appellant
v.
North Dakota Workforce Safety and Insurance, Appellee - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : WORKERS COMPENSATION
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 2021-CV-01290
South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
James S. Hill
2022 ND 118975 N.W.2d 552
Oral Argument
3/9/2022
Highlight
An appellant must satisfy statutory requirements for perfecting an appeal to the district court from an administrative agency decision for the court to have subject matter jurisdiction.
A petitioner for a writ of mandamus must show there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy and that they have a clear legal right to performance of the act sought to be compelled by the writ.
Under N.D.C.C. § 65-04-32(2), an employer is required to file a request for reconsideration of a Workforce Safety and Insurance notice of decision within the statutory time limit, and the time requirement is not extended by N.D.R.Civ.P. 6(e).
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
| Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11/16/2021 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 11/16/2021 | |
| 2 | 12/02/2021 | NOT. OF FILING NOT. OF APPEAL AND PROOF OF SERV. | |
| 3 | 12/02/2021 | Notice filed on Lawrence E. King, Nathan Svihovec & Jacqueline S. Anderson | |
| 4 | 12/02/2021 | Rec'd $125 filing fee | |
| 5 | 12/14/2021 | ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED DECEMBER 13, 2021 (ENTRY NOS.1-33) | |
| 6 | 12/20/2021 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF | |
| 7 | 12/22/2021 | AMENDED MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF | |
| 8 | 12/23/2021 | ACTION BY CLERK - Granted : 01/17/2022 | |
| 9 | 01/12/2022 | APPELLANT BRIEF (Amended ATB filed 1/14/22) | |
| 10 | 01/12/2022 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | |
| 11 | 01/14/2022 | MOTION TO AMEND APPELLANT'S BRIEF | |
| 12 | 01/14/2022 | AMENDED APPELLANT BRIEF | View |
| 13 | 01/14/2022 | Oral Argument Request by Appellant | |
| 14 | 01/14/2022 | Rec'd non-substantive corrections to ATA | |
| 15 | 01/17/2022 | ACTION BY CLERK (Motion to Amend Appellant's Brief) - Granted | |
| 16 | 01/21/2022 | Rec'd additional non-substantive corrections to ATA (noa to SC) | |
| 17 | 01/25/2022 | Rec'd 3 copies of ATB & 2 copies of ATA from CSD | |
| 18 | 02/03/2022 | APPELLEE BRIEF | View |
| 19 | 02/03/2022 | Oral Argument Request by Appellee | |
| 20 | 02/15/2022 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
| 21 | 02/16/2022 | REPLY BRIEF | View |
| 22 | 02/18/2022 | Rec'd 3 copies of RYB from CSD | |
| 23 | 02/24/2022 | Rec'd 3 copies of AEB from CSD | |
| 24 | 03/09/2022 | APPEARANCES: Lawrence E. King & Nathan J. Svihovec; Jacqueline S. Anderson | |
| 25 | 03/09/2022 | ARGUED: Lawrence E. King; Jacqueline S. Anderson | |
| 26 | 03/09/2022 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
| 27 | 06/08/2022 | DISPOSITION | |
| 28 | 06/08/2022 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : VandeWalle, Gerald W. | View |
| 29 | 06/08/2022 | Judgment | View |
| 30 | 06/08/2022 | Costs taxed in favor of Appellee | |
| 31 | 06/30/2022 | MANDATE |