State v. Frederick
Docket Info
- Title
- State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Demoris Omar Frederick, Defendant and Appellant - Case Type
- CRIMINAL APPEAL : ASSAULT
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 2021-CR-01079
South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Pamela Ann Nesvig
Highlight
In the instance of an alleged public trial violation, an appellant must demonstrate the public was excluded from a proceeding taking place during trial, and that the proceeding was substantive in nature.
A district court closing a proceeding to the public is significantly different from the court failing to make an adequate record of a bench conference conducted in an open trial. An inadequate record is not equivalent to a closed trial.
To demonstrate that an inadequate record affects a defendant’s substantial rights, the defendant must demonstrate the record cannot be adequately supplemented or reconstructed.
A violation of Appendix 1, Standard 7(d), N.D. Sup. Ct. Admin. R. 9 is not per se reversible error.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 03/01/2022 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 03/01/2022 | |
2 | 03/01/2022 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 03/03/2022 | |
3 | 03/03/2022 | NOT. OF FILING NOT. OF APPEAL AND PROOF OF SERV. | |
4 | 03/03/2022 | Notice served on Kent M. Morrow & Tessa M. Vaagen | |
5 | 03/05/2022 | Kiara C. Kraus-Parr appointed appellant counsel | |
6 | 03/07/2022 | AMENDED ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT | |
7 | 03/08/2022 | Order denying request for transcripts filed in district court | |
8 | 03/08/2022 | Order denying request for transcripts filed in district court | |
9 | 03/15/2022 | MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF TRANSCRIPTS | |
10 | 03/16/2022 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE - Granted | |
11 | 03/16/2022 | Order granting motion for production of transcripts | |
12 | 04/25/2022 | ELEC. REC. ON APPEAL DATED MARCH 25, 2022 (ENTRY NOS.1-238, 240, 246-268)(Not Rec'd - 239, 241-245) | |
13 | 04/25/2022 | ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED APRIL 22, 2022(ENTRY NOS. 269-278) | |
14 | 04/26/2022 | 2ND ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED APRIL 26, 2022 (ENTRY NOS. 279-285) | |
15 | 04/28/2022 | 3RD ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED APRIL 27, 2022 (ENTRY NOS.286-289) | |
16 | 05/02/2022 | 4TH ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED APRIL 29, 2022 (ENTRY NOS. 290-293) | |
17 | 05/02/2022 | 5TH ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED MAY 2, 2022 (ENTRY NOS. 294-298) | |
18 | 05/03/2022 | All Transcripts Filed in Record | |
19 | 05/03/2022 | 6TH ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED MAY 3, 2022 (ENTRY NOS. 299-303) | |
20 | 06/13/2022 | APPELLANT BRIEF | View |
21 | 06/13/2022 | Oral Argument Request by Appellant | |
22 | 06/16/2022 | Rec'd copies of ATB from Central Duplicating | |
23 | 07/13/2022 | APPELLEE BRIEF | View |
24 | 07/13/2022 | Oral Argument Request by Appellee | |
25 | 07/15/2022 | Rec'd copies of AEB from Central Duplicating | |
26 | 08/20/2022 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
27 | 09/08/2022 | APPEARANCES: Kiara C. Kraus-Parr/Dennis H. Ingold | |
28 | 09/08/2022 | ARGUED: Kiara C. Kraus-Parr/Dennis H. Ingold | |
29 | 09/08/2022 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
30 | 09/09/2022 | ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION : VandeWalle, Gerald W. | |
31 | 11/08/2022 | 7TH ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED NOVEMBER 7, 2022 (ENTRY NOS. 304-306) | View |
32 | 04/26/2023 | DISPOSITION | |
33 | 04/26/2023 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : Jensen, Jon J. | View |
34 | 04/26/2023 | Judgment | View |
35 | 05/10/2023 | Non-compliant PER rec'd; given until 5/16/23 (length) | |
36 | 05/11/2023 | Second non-compliant PER rec'd; given until 5/16/23 (tables combine) | |
37 | 05/16/2023 | PETITION FOR REHEARING | View |
38 | 05/17/2023 | Rec'd 4 copies of PER from CSD | |
39 | 05/25/2023 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - Denied | View |
40 | 06/02/2023 | MANDATE | |
41 | 06/27/2023 | Corrected/Substitute Opinion Page (pg 10, para 21, ln 15 "administrate" changed to "administrative" |