Whether the district court abused its discretion by enjoining Section 12.1-32-12 without evaluating whether RRWC has a substantial probability of succeeding on the merits of its case against Wrigley, which is one of four factors courts must consider before granting a preliminary injunction.
Whether the district court abused its discretion by enjoining Section 12.1-31-12 because the injunction is not supported by the law or the State Constitution.

1. Whether this Court should grant the extraordinary and rare relief of a supervisory writ when the District Court has now addressed the substantial probability of success on the merits?
2. Whether the District Court abused its discretion when it determined that Respondents Access Independent Health Services, Inc. d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic and Kathryn L. Eggleston, M.D. (“Providers”) had met their burden of showing that they were entitled to a preliminary injunction to prevent enforcement of N.D. Cent. Code § 12.1-31-12 (the “Abortion Ban” or the “Statute”) because (1) Providers are likely to succeed on the merits of their claims; (2) Providers and their patients will suffer irreparable injury absent injunctive relief; and (3) the potential harm to others and the public interest weigh in favor of granting the injunction?