State v. Jacobs
- State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
Travis Lee Jacobs, Defendant and Appellant
- Case Type
- CRIMINAL APPEAL : MISC. STATUTORY OFFENSE (FELONY)
- Appeal From
Case No. 2022-CR-00246
South Central Judicial District, Morton County
Douglas Alan Bahr
Parties' Statement of Issues
Whether the district court erred by finding sufficient evidence existed to convict Jacobs of Endangering By Fire or Explosion under N.D.C.C. §12.1-21-02.
Whether the district court erred by finding sufficient evidence existed to convict Jacobs of Violation of Order Prohibiting Contact under N.D.C.C. §12.1-31.2-02.
Whether the district court erred by denying the Defendant’s challenge to a prospective juror for cause.
[¶2.] The District Court did not err in finding sufficient evidence existed to convict Travis Lee Jacobs of Endangering by Fire or Explosion under N.D.C.C. Section 12.1-21-02 and Violation of Order Prohibiting Contact under N.D.C.C. Section 12.1-31.2-02.
[¶3.] The District Court Did Not Err In Finding Sufficient Evidence Existed That The Fire Was Intentionally Started.
[¶4.] The District Court did not err in denying the Defendant’s, Travis Lee Jacobs, challenge to a prospective juror for cause.
Travis Lee Jacobs appeals a district court’s criminal judgment finding him guilty of endangering by fire or explosion and violation of an order prohibiting contact. Jacob raises three issues on appeal arguing there is insufficient evidence of guilt as to both charges, and that the district court erred by denying Jacobs’ challenge to a prospective juror for cause.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
|Seq. #||Filing Date||Description||Attachment|
|1||09/21/2022||NOTICE OF APPEAL : 09/21/2022||View|
|2||09/21/2022||ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 09/23/2022||View|
|3||09/22/2022||NOT. OF FILING NOT. OF APPEAL AND PROOF OF SERV.||View|
|4||09/22/2022||Notice Served on William Woodworth and Paul E. Jensen|
|5||10/18/2022||ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED OCTOBER 17, 2022 (ENTRY NOS. 1-86)||View|
|6||11/17/2022||All Transcripts Filed in Record|
|8||12/27/2022||Oral Argument Request by Appellant|
|9||01/03/2023||Rec'd corrections to ATB (service and authorities)|
|10||01/04/2023||Rec'd 3 copies of ATB from CSD|
|12||01/26/2023||Oral Argument Request by Appellee|
|13||01/27/2023||Recieved corrections for AEB (table of contents & auth)|
|14||01/27/2023||Rec'd 3 copies for AEB from CSD|
|15||02/02/2023||ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION : Bahr, Douglas Alan|
|16||02/23/2023||NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT|
|17||02/24/2023||SITTING WITH THE COURT : Neumann, William A.|