Docket Info

Title: Nichole Bechtle, n.k.a. Nichole Hammeren, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Joshua R. Bechtle, Defendant and Appellant
and
State of North Dakota, Statutory Real Party in Interest
Case Type: CIVIL APPEAL : CHILD CUST & SUPPORT (Div.\Other)
Appeal From: Case No. 2015-DM-00611
South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
David E. Reich

2023 ND 166

Highlight

A district court order denying a motion to modify parenting time is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P 35.1(a)(2).

Party	Type	Name
APPELLANT	PRIVATE PRACTICE	William Woodworth - 08707
APPELLEE	PRIVATE PRACTICE	Erica Jo Shively - 06296

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. #	Filing Date	Description	Attachment
1	02/23/2023	NOTICE OF APPEAL : 02/23/2023	View
2	02/23/2023	ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 03/02/2023	View
3	03/01/2023	Rec'd Filing Fee
4	03/01/2023	NOT. OF FILING NOT. OF APPEAL AND PROOF OF SERV.	View
5	03/01/2023	Notice served on William D. Woodworth and Erica J. Shively
6	03/13/2023	Notice that State of North Dakota is a real party in interest	View
7	03/23/2023	ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED MARCH 22, 2023 (ENTRY NOS. 1-218)	View
8	05/01/2023	All Transcripts Filed in Record
9	05/04/2023	1ST ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED MAY 3, 2023 (ENTRY NOS. 219-225)	View
10	06/12/2023	APPELLANT BRIEF	View
11	06/12/2023	Oral Argument Request by Appellant
12	06/13/2023	Rec'd notice from Cody Hedge, Child Support Unit will not be participating in this appeal	View
13	06/15/2023	Rec'd 3 copies of ATB from CSD
14	07/12/2023	APPELLEE BRIEF	View
15	07/13/2023	Rec'd 3 copies of AEB back from CD
16	07/20/2023	S.CT. DETERMINED ORAL ARGUMENT NOT NECESSARY
17	07/26/2023	REPLY BRIEF	View
18	07/27/2023	Rec'd 3 copies of RYB back from CD
19	09/05/2023	APPEARANCES: Waived Under N.D.R.App.P. 34 (a)(1)(E),
20	09/05/2023	ARGUED: Waived Under N.D.R.App.P. 34 (a)(1)(E),
21	09/14/2023	DISPOSITION
22	09/14/2023	UNANIMOUS OPINION : Per Curiam	View
23	09/14/2023	Judgment	View
24	09/14/2023	Costs on appeal taxed in favor of Appellee under N.D.R.App.P. 39