Opinions

Riemers v. City of Grand Forks 2006 ND 224
Docket No.: 20060057
Filing Date: 11/7/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A party opposing summary judgment may not merely rely upon the pleadings or unsupported, conclusory allegations.
A party waives an issue by not providing supporting arguments, reasoning, or citations to relevant legal authority.
An Attorney General's opinion is "highly persuasive" if it is consistent with the district court's independent analysis of the issues presented.
Under the open records law, a public entity need not disclose a record that is not in its possession or custody at the time of the request.
The "criminal intelligence and investigative information exception," which exempts active criminal investigation material from disclosure under the open records law, is temporary in nature and terminates upon the completion of the criminal prosecution.

Sambursky v. State (Consol. w/20050331-20050335) 2006 ND 223
Docket No.: 20050330
Filing Date: 11/7/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A district court may summarily dismiss an application for post-conviction relief if there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
If the petitioner raises an issue of material fact in resisting summary dismissal of an application for post-conviction relief, the petitioner is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the matter.
In a post-conviction relief proceeding alleging the ineffective assistance of counsel with respect to a guilty plea, counsel is ineffective if a claimant can show that counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors, the petitioner would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.

State v. Davis 2006 ND 222
Docket No.: 20060033
Filing Date: 11/7/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Convictions for carrying a concealed firearm and possessing a short-barreled shotgun are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Rojas v. Workforce Safety and Ins., et al. (Cross-ref. w/20040352) 2006 ND 221
Docket No.: 20060087
Filing Date: 10/23/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: An injured employee is entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees when Workforce Safety and Insurance acts without substantial justification in reducing or denying the employee's benefits.

Hasper v. Center Mutual Ins. Co. 2006 ND 220
Docket No.: 20050316
Filing Date: 10/23/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Insurance
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: An insurer which seeks to deny underinsured motorist coverage based upon the insured's failure to notify the insurer of a proposed settlement with the tortfeasor must demonstrate that it suffered actual prejudice resulting from the lack of notice.
The determination whether an insurer has been prejudiced by an unauthorized settlement is a question of fact that is generally inappropriate for summary judgment.
In determining whether an insurer has suffered actual prejudice from an unauthorized settlement, relevant factors include the amount of the tortfeasor's assets, the likelihood of recovery via subrogation, the extent of the insured's damages, and the expenses and risks of litigating the insured's cause of action.

Guardianship/Conservatorship of Thomas 2006 ND 219
Docket No.: 20050370
Filing Date: 10/20/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Guardian/Conservator
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: The Supreme Court applies the abuse of discretion standard when reviewing a trial court's selection of a guardian and conservator.
Concern over the appearance of undue influence can establish "good cause," justifying the appointment of a neutral and detached person as guardian and conservator over others with higher priority who have a financial interest in the protected person's assets.
The Supreme Court applies the abuse of discretion standard of review to the district court's ultimate decision whether to approve payment of a claim against a protected person's estate and the clearly erroneous standard of review to the court's underlying findings of fact.

Interest of B.L.S. (Confidential) 2006 ND 218
Docket No.: 20060234
Filing Date: 10/20/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Mental Health
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: After a request to treat with medication has been made, an independent physician or psychiatrist must certify that the proposed treatment is clinically appropriate and necessary, that the patient was offered the treatment and refused it, that the prescribed medication is the least restrictive form necessary to meet the patient's needs, and that the benefits of treatment outweigh the known risks.
Mental health respondents are entitled to adequate notice and the opportunity to prepare to address the involuntary treatment with medication.
A district court cannot order medications which have not been noticed in the request to treat with medication and have not been certified as clinically appropriate and necessary by a second physician or psychiatrist.
The involuntary treatment with medication is not limited to psychotropic medications used to treat mental illness.

Hild, et al. v. Johnson, et al. 2006 ND 217
Docket No.: 20060056
Filing Date: 10/20/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: An undivided mineral interest conveyed or reserved in a deed may be expressed as a percentage, as a fraction, or as a specified number of mineral acres.
A grantee of a specified number of mineral acres in a described tract of land acquires that number of acres, and does not gain or lose if the tract contains more or less acreage than contemplated by the parties.
A grantee of an undivided mineral interest expressed as a percentage or fraction acquires that quantum in the entire described tract of land, and may gain or lose if the tract contains more or less acreage than contemplated by the parties.
When there is a discrepancy in a deed between the specific description of the property conveyed and an expression of the quantity conveyed, the specific description is controlling.
Quantity is the least certain of all elements of description in a deed, and all other elements of description must be ambiguous and uncertain before a recital of quantity will be considered.

Rummer v. State (Cross-reference w/19950324) 2006 ND 216
Docket No.: 20050341
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: The petitioner has the burden of establishing grounds for post-conviction relief.
In order to prevail on a post-conviction claim for ineffective assistance of counsel, the petitioner has the heavy burden of proving: (1) counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) the defendant was prejudiced by counsel's deficient performance.
To establish a Brady violation, the defendant must prove: (1) the government possessed evidence favorable to the defendant; (2) the defendant did not possess the evidence and could not have obtained it with reasonable diligence; (3) the prosecution suppressed the evidence; and (4) a reasonable probability exists that the outcome of the proceedings would have been different if the evidence had been disclosed.
A foreign-national criminal defendant may waive any right to consular notification by failing to timely raise the issue.

Livinggood v. Balsdon 2006 ND 215
Docket No.: 20060130
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: On remand, a district court may, unless otherwise specified, make its decision on the basis of the evidence already before it or may take additional evidence. The decision on taking additional evidence will be reversed only if the district court abuses its discretion.
Forcible ejectment or exclusion from real property is a conclusion of law fully reviewable on appeal.
Forcible ejectment from real property does not require the actual application of physical force; rather, it is enough if it is present and threatened, and is justly to be feared. This standard requires only that the plaintiff had reason to believe that he would be put out by the application of physical force if he did not obey.
The appropriate standard of review in an appeal challenging a district court's award of damages in a bench trial is whether the district court's findings of fact on damages are clearly erroneous.
A district court must award treble damages if it concludes that one person forcibly ejected or excluded another from real property.

Eichhorn v. The Waldo Township Bd. of Supervisors, et al. 2006 ND 214
Docket No.: 20050295
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Original Proceeding - Civil - Writ of Mandamus
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: Intervention is appropriate when the intervenor claims an interest relating to the property or transaction that is the subject of the action and that the disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede the intervenor's ability to protect that interest, unless the interest is adequately represented by existing parties.
A party seeking a writ of mandamus must show that there is a "clear legal right" to performance of the particular act sought to be compelled by the writ and that there is no other plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law.
North Dakota statutes envision cooperation between townships and water resource district boards.

Witzke v. Gonzales 2006 ND 213
Docket No.: 20060155
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A civil action is commenced by the service of a summons.
Absent personal jurisdiction, the court is powerless to do anything beyond dismissing without prejudice.

State v. Ebel (Consolidated w/20050441-20050443) 2006 ND 212
Docket No.: 20050440
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: The Court looks at the "totality of the circumstances" on appeal, giving deference to the district court's findings, to determine whether a search warrant was supported by probable cause.
An evidentiary hearing on whether false statements were provided to support the issuance of a search warrant is only required where: (1) a defendant makes a substantial preliminary showing, accompanied by an offer of proof, that false statements were made in support of a search warrant, either knowingly and intentionally or with reckless disregard for the truth, and (2) the allegedly false statements are necessary to a finding of probable cause.

State v. Sevigny 2006 ND 211
Docket No.: 20050315
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Evidence of an alibi defense may be excluded if a defendant fails to give sufficient notice of his intent to present evidence of an alibi.
A defendant has a right to give testimony about an alibi, even if the defendant fails to give notice of the defense and all alibi evidence is excluded.
A district court must make sufficient findings of fact when admitting or excluding testimony about a child's out-of-court statements about sexual abuse.
A district court has wide discretion over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence.
Intentional disobedience of a court order constitutes contempt.

Interest of T.A., et al. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2006 ND 210
Docket No.: 20060063
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: To terminate parental rights, the petitioner must prove three elements by clear and convincing evidence: (1) the child is a deprived child, (2) the conditions and causes of the deprivation are likely to continue or will not be remedied, and (3) that by reason thereof the child is suffering or will probably suffer serious physical, mental, moral, or emotional harm.
To prove deprivation is likely to continue or will not be remedied, the petitioner cannot rely on past deprivation alone, but must provide prognostic evidence, demonstrating the deprivation will continue.

State v. Odom 2006 ND 209
Docket No.: 20060106
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: Warrantless searches are unreasonable unless they fall within a recognized exception to the warrant requirement. Consent is an exception to the warrant requirement. The scope of an individual's consent is determined by considering what an objectively reasonable person would have understood the consent to include. The scope of a search is generally defined by its expressed object.
When general consent is given to search a room, no limitations are placed on the consent, the consent is not withdrawn, and the expressed object of the search is known, a police officer can reasonably search locked or closed containers within the room without a warrant.

Forbes v. Workforce Safety & Ins., et al. 2006 ND 208
Docket No.: 20050431
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: In an administrative appeal, the Court determines only whether a reasoning mind reasonably could have determined that the factual conclusions reached were proved by the weight of the evidence from the entire record.
To trigger the civil penalties for making a false statement in connection with a claim for WSI benefits, WSI must prove: (1) there is a false claim or statement; (2) the false claim or statement is willfully made; and (3) the false claim or statement is made in connection with any claim or application for benefits.
Based upon the civil penalty sought, there are two tests to determine the "materiality of a false statement." If WSI seeks reimbursement for benefits paid, the level of materiality required is proof by WSI that the false claim or false statement caused the benefits to be paid in error. If WSI seeks only forfeiture of future benefits, however, no such causal connection is required.

City of Bismarck v. Perusquia 2006 ND 207
Docket No.: 20060048
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A conviction for driving under the influence is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Jangula v. Jangula (Cross-Ref. w/20050070) 2006 ND 206
Docket No.: 20060168
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce - Property
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court's property division in a divorce is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

City of Jamestown v. Rethemeier (Consolidated w/20060100) 2006 ND 205
Docket No.: 20060099
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Misdemeanor
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Denial of motion to suppress and judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Lee v. Buehner, et al. 2006 ND 204
Docket No.: 20060052
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A judgment awarding damages in a personal injury action is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7).

Ernst v. State 2006 ND 203
Docket No.: 20060108
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Denial of application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1), (6), and (7).

Thurn v. Workforce Safety and Insurance, et al. 2006 ND 202
Docket No.: 20060092
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An order of Workforce Safety and Insurance denying workers compensation benefits is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5).

State v. DeGroot 2006 ND 201
Docket No.: 20050408
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Theft
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Conviction of theft of property summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

State v. Jackson (cross-ref. w/940199) 2006 ND 200
Docket No.: 20060034
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Conviction of driving under suspension summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).

Interest of K.S., et al. (Consolidated w/20050398) CONFIDENTIAL 2006 ND 199
Docket No.: 20050397
Filing Date: 10/17/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order terminating parental rights summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Sandberg v. American Family Ins. 2006 ND 198
Docket No.: 20050396
Filing Date: 9/14/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Insurance
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: The requirements of a statute may become part of an insurance policy.
An insured's unauthorized settlement with Workforce Safety and Insurance does not adversely affect an insurer, because the settlement does not affect the insurer's right to a reduction in damages payable to the insured for uninsured motorist coverage by the amount paid or payable for workers' compensation benefits.
An amount is payable for workers' compensation benefits if it would have been paid to the workers' compensation claimant.

Stenvold v. Workforce Safety & Insurance, et al. 2006 ND 197
Docket No.: 20050344
Filing Date: 9/14/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: An administrative agency generally may not consider evidence which has not been offered, admitted, and made a part of the official record of the administrative proceeding.
The district court's appellate review of an administrative agency decision is limited to the agency record filed with the court.

State v. Graf (Consolidated w/20050411-20050417) 2006 ND 196
Docket No.: 20050410
Filing Date: 9/13/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: Warrantless searches inside an individual's home are presumptively unreasonable, but searches inside an individual's home are not unreasonable if the search falls under one of the well-delineated exceptions to the warrant requirement.
Consent to search is an exception to the warrant requirement.
Consent to search purges the taint of prior unlawful police activity if the consent was voluntary under the totality of the circumstances and if the taint of the prior unlawful activity is purged, considering the temporal proximity between the illegal search and the consent, the presence of intervening circumstances, and the purpose and flagrancy of the official misconduct.
Consultation with an attorney may purge the taint of prior unlawful police activity.

Industrial Commission v. Noack 2006 ND 195
Docket No.: 20060067
Filing Date: 9/13/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: An appellant has the duty to provide a transcript sufficient to allow a meaningful and intelligent review of the alleged errors.
To justify rescission of a contract, a mutual mistake must relate to the subject matter and essential elements of the contract, and not merely be collateral to it.
A party seeking to rescind a contract must offer to restore to the other party everything of value which the rescinding party received from the other party under the contract.

Ellis v. Disciplinary Board 2006 ND 194
Docket No.: 20060081
Filing Date: 9/13/2006
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Disciplinary proceedings against lawyers, including reinstatement proceedings, are reviewed de novo on the record.
After a lengthy suspension, a lawyer may be required to retake and pass the bar examination as a condition of reinstatement.

State v. Iverson 2006 ND 193
Docket No.: 20060097
Filing Date: 9/13/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Homicide
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A statute authorizing credit for time served in custody cannot be retroactively applied after a person has been finally convicted.

State v. Schmidkunz 2006 ND 192
Docket No.: 20050141
Filing Date: 9/13/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Homicide
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: In controlling the scope of closing argument, the district court is vested with discretion, and absent a clear showing of an abuse of discretion, we will not reverse on grounds the prosecutor exceeded the scope of permissible closing argument. Unless the error is fundamental, a defendant must demonstrate a prosecutor's comments during closing argument were improper and prejudicial.
Testimony in the form of an opinion or inference otherwise admissible is not objectionable because it embraces an ultimate issue to be decided by the trier of fact.
The district court has broad discretion over the conduct of a trial, including scheduling the time for jury deliberations. The court must exercise its discretion in a manner that best comports with substantial justice.

Leet, et al. v. City of Minot 2006 ND 191
Docket No.: 20060011
Filing Date: 9/13/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: For recreational use immunity statutes to apply, a person's presence on the landowner's property open for public recreation must be for "recreational purposes," which includes any activity engaged in for the purpose of exercise, relaxation, pleasure, or education.
A vendor's employee who was present at the City's auditorium for purposes of his employment is not engaged in any activity for the purpose of exercise, relaxation, pleasure, or education.

Strand, et al. v. Cass County, et al. 2006 ND 190
Docket No.: 20050380
Filing Date: 8/28/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Jury instructions are reviewed to determine whether, as a whole, they fairly and adequately advised the jury of the applicable law.
A local government body may only be held liable for constitutional violations which result from a policy or custom of the government body.
A district court abuses its discretion when it fails to address nonfrivolous issues presented to the court.

Tibert, et al. v. City of Minto 2006 ND 189
Docket No.: 20050393
Filing Date: 8/28/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A decision of a local governing body will be affirmed on appeal unless the local governing body acted arbitrarily, capriciously, or unreasonably, or there is not substantial evidence to support the decision.

Interest of B.L.S. (Confidential) 2006 ND 188
Docket No.: 20060216
Filing Date: 8/28/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Mental Health
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A district court cannot allow a respondent in a mental health proceeding to waive the right to counsel without first establishing, on the record, that the respondent is competent to waive counsel and that the waiver is knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made.
To establish a valid waiver of counsel in a mental health proceeding, the district court must engage in a colloquy on the record that mirrors the required colloquy for the waiver of counsel in a criminal proceeding.

ACUITY v. Burd & Smith Construction, Inc., et al. 2006 ND 187
Docket No.: 20060001
Filing Date: 8/24/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Insurance
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A commercial general liability insurance policy excludes coverage for damage to the insured's work product and provides coverage for accidental damage to property other than the insured's work product.

Jochim v. Jochim 2006 ND 186
Docket No.: 20060038
Filing Date: 8/24/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Maring, Mary

Ungar v. ND State University 2006 ND 185
Docket No.: 20050340
Filing Date: 8/24/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Employer/Employee Dispute
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Res judicata, or claim preclusion, prevents the relitigation of claims that were raised, or could have been raised, in prior actions between the same parties or their privies resulting final judgment from a court of competent jurisdiction. Collateral estoppel, or issue preclusion, forecloses relitigation of issues of either fact or law in a second action based on a different claim, which were necessarily litigated, or must have been litigated, and decided in the prior action.
For the district court to have subject-matter jurisdiction over a university professor's claims against the university, the plaintiff must comply with the statutory notice of claim requirements and exhaust the internal administrative remedies.

State v. Dailey 2006 ND 184
Docket No.: 20060030
Filing Date: 8/24/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: After a jury's verdict has been announced, a trial judge may explain to a jury what will occur after the trial has ended.

Peoples State Bk. of Truman v. Molstad Excavating, et al. 2006 ND 183
Docket No.: 20050444
Filing Date: 8/24/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Part of the law of the case doctrine provides that the orderly functioning of the judicial process requires that judges of coordinate jurisdiction honor one another's orders and revisit them only in special circumstances.
The law of the case is not violated and reconsideration of prior orders is proper if the initial ruling was made on an inadequate record or was designed to be preliminary or tentative.
Construction of a written contract to determine its legal effect is a question of law, and on appeal this Court will independently examine and construe the contract to determine if the trial court erred in its interpretation.
To enforce a contract between two others, a third party must have been intended by the contracting parties to be benefited by the contract.

Clark v. Clark 2006 ND 182
Docket No.: 20050436
Filing Date: 8/21/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A district court's decisions to admit expert testimony or deny a continuance will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion.
A district court's decision whether to allow children to testify about their custody preference is reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard.
Rotating custody arrangements are in a child's best interests only if the parents are able to cooperate and set aside their differences and conflicts in their role as parents.
A district court's custody decision under the best-interest-of-the-child analysis is subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review.
Because a proper finding of net income is essential to determine the correct amount of child support under the child support guidelines, as a matter of law, a district court must clearly set forth how it arrived at the amount of income and the level of support.
A district court cannot include depreciation deductions in income when determining an obligor's child support obligation.

Hagel v. Hagel 2006 ND 181
Docket No.: 20050434
Filing Date: 8/21/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: When a district court provides no indication of the evidentiary and theoretical basis for its decision, the Supreme Court is left to speculate whether factors were properly considered and the law was properly applied, leaving the Court unable to perform its appellate function.

Mountrail Bethel Home v. Lovdahl, et al. 2006 ND 180
Docket No.: 20060002
Filing Date: 8/16/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A district court must make findings on issues a party raises and presents evidence on.

State v. Woinarowicz 2006 ND 179
Docket No.: 20060032
Filing Date: 8/16/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: The Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause does not apply to the same extent at pretrial suppression hearings as it does at trial.
A district court is not bound by the Rules of Evidence at pretrial evidentiary hearings.
Constructive possession of a controlled substance may be established by showing the individual had the power and ability to exercise dominion and control over the controlled substance.
An arrestee's person and purse may be searched incident to arrest.

Gabel v. N.D. Department of Transportation 2006 ND 178
Docket No.: 20060003
Filing Date: 8/16/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: Kapsner, Carol

City of Fargo v. Komad 2006 ND 177
Docket No.: 20050452
Filing Date: 8/16/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Theft
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Heng v. Rotech Medical Corp., et al. 2006 ND 176
Docket No.: 20050311
Filing Date: 8/2/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Employer/Employee Dispute
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: Issues cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.
Whether an employee has established a prima facie case of retaliatory discharge is a question of law fully reviewable on appeal.
An employer's failure to follow its own policies may support an inference of pretext, but not when the departure in policy is applied to all employees.
The admission of deposition testimony under N.D.R.Civ.P. 32(a) lies within the district court's discretion.
A comparison of hours and rates charged by opposing counsel is probative of the reasonableness of a request for attorney fees by prevailing counsel.
Mediation fees may not be awarded as an allowable cost if the parties have contractually agreed to share those expenses.
Electronic legal research fees are a component of attorney fees and cannot be separately taxed as costs.

State ex rel. ND Housing Finance Agency v. Center Mutual Ins. Co. 2006 ND 175
Docket No.: 20050224
Filing Date: 8/2/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Insurance
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: An instrument payable to multiple payees non-alternatively may only be negotiated, discharged, or enforced by all of them.
Payment of a check by a payor bank to one joint payee over the forged endorsement of another payee does not discharge the drawer's obligation on the instrument, and the payee has an action against the drawer on the instrument.
A check containing a forged endorsement is not "properly payable" under N.D.C.C. 41-04-32(1), and the drawer has a right to reimbursement of the amount of the check to its account if its bank accepts and pays the check.