Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
551 - 600 of 12358 results
Chambering of Two New Judgeships in the East Central Judicial District
2023 ND 95 |
Falcon v. Knudsen, et al.
2023 ND 94
Highlight: A district court order finding appellant did not establish a prima facie case for modification of primary residential responsibility and denying his motion to modify primary residential responsibility is affirmed. |
Falcon v. Knudsen, et al.
2023 ND 94 |
Matter of Shane Lance Yates
2023 ND 93
Highlight: District court orders denying petitions for name changes are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Matter of Shane Lance Yates
2023 ND 93 |
Matter of Amy Jo Yates
2023 ND 93
Highlight: District court orders denying petitions for name changes are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Gartei v. Gartei
2023 ND 92 Highlight: A district court order denying a motion to vacate the judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
Kutcka, et al. v. Gateway Building Systems, et al.
2023 ND 91
Highlight: A general contractor is not the statutory employer of its subcontractor’s employees entitling it to immunity from suit under the exclusive remedy provisions of N.D.C.C. § 65-04-28. |
Kutcka, et al. v. Gateway Building Systems, et al.
2023 ND 91 |
Nelson v. NDDOT
2023 ND 90 Highlight: Without a valid request for an on-site screening test, including a valid advisory, there can be no refusal to submit to screening under N.D.C.C. § 39-20-14. |
Nelson v. NDDOT
2023 ND 90 |
State v. Walsh
2023 ND 89 Highlight: A district court must inform the defendant of the court’s authority to order restitution before a guilty plea can be accepted. |
Legacie-Lowe v. Lowe
2023 ND 88
Highlight: The district court’s findings are inadequate to understand the basis for the decision. |
Legacie-Lowe v. Lowe
2023 ND 88 |
Johnson v. City of Jamestown
2023 ND 87 Highlight: A judgment dismissing a personal injury action is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
Johnson v. City of Jamestown
2023 ND 87 |
Anderson v. Anderson
2023 ND 86
Highlight: All property held by either party, whether held jointly or individually, is considered marital property. |
Anderson v. Anderson
2023 ND 86 |
E.R.J. v. T.L.B. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 85
Highlight: A district court’s findings that changing a child’s name is in the best interests of a child satisfies the good cause standard under N.D.C.C. § 14-20-57(7). |
E.R.J. v. T.L.B. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 85 |
Nodak Ins. Co. v. Farm Family Casualty Ins. Co., et al.
2023 ND 84
Highlight: Interpretation of an insurance policy is a question of law, fully reviewable on appeal. |
Nodak Ins. Co. v. Farm Family Casualty Ins. Co., et al.
2023 ND 84 |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 3, NWJD
2023 ND 83 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Williston. |
State v. Smith
2023 ND 82
Highlight: When a party asserts prosecutorial misconduct for the first time on appeal, this Court may review for obvious error. |
State v. Smith
2023 ND 82 |
State v. Schaf
2023 ND 81
Highlight: The district court decides the qualifications of the witness to express an opinion on a given topic. The decision whether to admit expert witness testimony rests within the court’s discretion. |
State v. Schaf
2023 ND 81 |
State v. Hannesson
2023 ND 80
Highlight: Ordering a mistrial is an extreme remedy that is only appropriate when there is a fundamental defect or occurrence at trial that makes it evident that continuing would be productive of manifest injustice. |
State v. Hannesson
2023 ND 80 |
Hanson v. Hettervig, et al.
2023 ND 79 Highlight: An order of contempt and an amended order of contempt and award of attorney’s fees are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
Hanson v. Hettervig, et al.
2023 ND 79 |
Fietzek v. Fietzek
2023 ND 78
Highlight: A district court’s finding on a valuation of real property is not clearly erroneous if it is within the range of evidence presented. |
Fietzek v. Fietzek
2023 ND 78 |
State v. Frederick
2023 ND 77
Highlight: In the instance of an alleged public trial violation, an appellant must demonstrate the public was excluded from a proceeding taking place during trial, and that the proceeding was substantive in nature. |
State v. Frederick
2023 ND 77 |
Sandberg v. WSI, et al.
2023 ND 76 |
Sandberg v. WSI, et al.
2023 ND 76
Highlight: WSI can exercise continuing jurisdiction under N.D.C.C. § 65-05-04, but is limited by the law-of-the-case doctrine. |
Estate of Lindbo
2023 ND 75
Highlight: A personal representative is entitled to reasonable compensation for the personal representative’s services. |
Estate of Lindbo
2023 ND 75 |
Krueger v. Krueger
2023 ND 74 Highlight: A district court’s order on spousal support and contempt is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Interest of K.B. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 73 Highlight: An order requiring hospitalization is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of J.S. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 72 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) & (4). |
Jahner v. NDDHS
2023 ND 71 Highlight: This Court exercises limited review in appeals from administrative agency decisions. However, the application and interpretation of a statute is a question of law, which is fully reviewable in an administrative appeal. |
Jahner v. NDDHS
2023 ND 71 |
State v. Jacobs
2023 ND 70 Highlight: A criminal judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4). |
State v. Jacobs
2023 ND 70 |
Jones v. Rath
2023 ND 69 Highlight: A disorderly conduct restraining order must be supported by specific findings of intent to adversely affect the safety, security, or privacy of another person. |
Jones v. Rath
2023 ND 69 |
State v. Neugebauer
2023 ND 68
Highlight: A criminal sentence finalized before enactment of a statute cannot be reduced. |
State v. Neugebauer
2023 ND 68 |