Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
6451 - 6500 of 12389 results
Disciplinary Action Against Robb
2000 ND 146
Highlight: Disciplinary Counsel must prove each violation by clear and convincing evidence. |
Holen v. ND Workers Comp. Bureau, et al.
2000 ND 145 |
Cox v. Cox
2000 ND 144 |
Hill v. State
2000 ND 143
Highlight: An order granting a new trial is a final judgment under the Uniform Post-Conviction Procedure Act and is appealable. |
Comes v. State
2000 ND 142 Highlight: Summary judgment denying post-conviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1). |
Designation of the Erickstad Courtroom
2000 ND 140 |
Mead, et al. v. Farmers Union Mutual Ins. Co.
2000 ND 139
Highlight: An insurer generally has a duty to defend an action against its insured if the allegations in the complaint give rise to the possibility of coverage under the insurance policy. |
Disciplinary Board v. Keller
2000 ND 138 Highlight: Interim suspension of lawyer ordered. |
Johnson Farms v. McEnroe, et al. (Cross-Ref. w/970045)
2000 ND 137 |
ND Securities Commissioner v. Juran and Moody, Inc., et al.
2000 ND 136 |
Tangen v. ND Workers Comp., et al.
2000 ND 135
Highlight: Although the law in effect at the time of injury ordinarily governs workers compensation claims, the law in effect at the time of aggravation of a prior work injury governs a reapplication for disability benefits. |
Singha v. ND State Board of Medical Examiners, et al. (Cross Ref. w/970264)
2000 ND 134 |
Ruscheinsky, et al. v. Ulrich
2000 ND 133 |
Wagner v. Wagner (cross-ref. w/970224 & 980395)
2000 ND 132 Highlight: A "mortgage on real estate" does not include a judgment lien. |
Houn v. ND Dept. of Transportation
2000 ND 131 Highlight: A person arrested for driving under the influence who refuses to submit to a blood-alcohol test may cure that refusal by consenting to a test within a reasonable time after the refusal if the subsequent test will still be accurate, testing equipment or facilities are still available, the subject has been in custody and under observation since the arrest, and the subsequent test will not result in substantial inconvenience or expense to law enforcement. |
Interest of A.R. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2000 ND 130
Highlight: In an appeal from an order of the juvenile court, review is not limited to determining whether the court's findings are clearly erroneous, but the findings are given appreciable weight. |
Interest of N.C.C.
2000 ND 129 |
State v. Krall
2000 ND 128 Highlight: Counterfeiting conviction entered upon a guilty plea summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Montgomery v. Disciplinary Board
2000 ND 127 |
Disciplinary Board v. Stevenson
2000 ND 126 Highlight: Attorney suspended from the practice of law for 60 days under Rule 4.4, N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl., governing reciprocal discipline. |
Disciplinary Board v. Roybal
2000 ND 125 Highlight: Attorney disbarred under Rule 4.4, N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl., governing reciprocal discipline |
Douville, et al. v. Pembina Co. Water Resource District
2000 ND 124 |
Hoffner v. ND Workers Comp. Bur., et al.
2000 ND 123 |
Negaard-Cooley v. ND Workers Comp., et al.
2000 ND 122 |
State v. Martin
2000 ND 121 |
Olson v. Olson, n/k/a Michels
2000 ND 120 |
State v. Rubey
2000 ND 119 |
Nelson, et al. v. Nelson
2000 ND 118 Highlight: Child support summary judgment summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Stibbe v. Saunders (See Docket Memo)
2000 ND 117 |
Kautzman v. Kautzman(consol. w/990386, Cross w/980004 & 20000083)
2000 ND 116 |
Buchholz v. City of Oriska
2000 ND 115 |
Horob v. Workers Comp. Bureau
2000 ND 114 |
Schiff v. Schiff
2000 ND 113 |
State v. Norrid
2000 ND 112 |
Dickie, et al. v. Farmers Union Oil Co., et al.
2000 ND 111 |
Crumley v. State
2000 ND 110 |
Auction Effertz, Ltd. v. Schecher
2000 ND 109 |
Reid, et al. v. Cuprum SA, de C.U.
2000 ND 108 |
Sullivan v. Pulkrabek
2000 ND 107 Highlight: The measure of damages for injury to property, caused by breach of an obligation not arising from a contract, is the lower of the reasonable cost of repair or the diminution in value. |
State v. Thieling
2000 ND 106 |
State v. Torgerson
2000 ND 105 |
Lonesome Dove Petroleum, Inc. v. Nelson, et al.
2000 ND 104 |
Tishmack, n/k/a Stern v. Tishmack
2000 ND 103 |
Werlinger, et al. v. Champion Healthcare, et al. (cross w/990027 & 990032)
2000 ND 102 Highlight: Orders again granting class certification after remand are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
State ex rel. D.D., et al. v. G.K. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2000 ND 101 |
Bublitz, dba DC Marketing v. Tsang, dba Purple Rooster
2000 ND 100 |
Peterson v. ND Workers Comp. Bureau
2000 ND 99 Highlight: The North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau's order dismissing claim for benefits is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5). |
Disciplinary Board v. Dvorak
2000 ND 98 |
Mau, et al. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh
2000 ND 97 |
North Central Good Samaritan Ctr., et al. v. ND Dept. of Human Serv.
2000 ND 96 |