Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
7201 - 7250 of 12389 results
|
State v. Harns
861 N.W.2d 173 Highlight: Driving under the influence conviction is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
|
State v. Beylund
861 N.W.2d 172 Highlight: Conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
|
State v. Birchfield
858 N.W.2d 302 Highlight: The implied consent statute criminalizing refusal to consent to a chemical test is not unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment or North Dakota Constitution. art. I, sec. 8. |
|
State v. Williams
873 N.W.2d 13 Highlight: The district court has discretion in deciding whether to grant a request for a transcript, and the court abuses its discretion by refusing the request if a particularized need, necessity, or justification for its preparation and use is shown. |
|
Interest of J.A.H. (Consolidated w/20140146)
855 N.W.2d 394 Highlight: When a juvenile court provides insufficient findings to review, jurisdiction may be retained under N.D.R.App.P. 35(a)(3) and the case remanded with instructions that the juvenile court make expedited findings of fact. |
|
Nemec v. Disciplinary Board
799 N.W.2d 370 Highlight: Lawyer reinstatement ordered. |
|
State v. Juntunen
845 N.W.2d 325 Highlight: A decision cannot be properly reviewed on appeal if the district court does not provide an adequate explanation of the basis for its decision. |
|
Disciplinary Board v. Howe
842 N.W.2d 646 Highlight: Interim suspension vacated. |
|
Phillips v. State
841 N.W.2d 731
Highlight: A separate appeal from an order denying the transcript of a post-conviction relief hearing is unnecessary when an appeal from an order denying post-conviction relief is already pending. |
|
Judicial Redistricting (consol. w/ 20130221)
833 N.W.2d 543 Highlight: Counties moved from South Central to Southeast Judicial District and Northwest Judicial District divided into two districts, effective January 1, 2014. |
|
Interest of S.R.B. (Confidential)
830 N.W.2d 565
Highlight: In an expedited appeal taken from an order for hospitalization and treatment, a trial court must make findings of fact specially under N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(a) as to whether the respondent is a person requiring treatment and hospitalization is the least restrictive treatment. |
|
Palmer v. State (consol.w/20110346-20110348)(cross-ref.w/20010123-20010126)
816 N.W.2d 807 Highlight: A decision cannot be properly reviewed on appeal if the district court does not provide an adequate explanation of its rationale for its decision. |
|
State v. Gress
803 N.W.2d 607 Highlight: A decision cannot be properly reviewed on appeal if the district court does not provide an adequate explanation of the basis for its decision. |
|
Estate of Fisk
780 N.W.2d 697
Highlight: The review of fees paid or taken by a personal representative is left to the sound discretion of the district court. |
|
Miller v. Workforce Safety and Insurance, et al.
684 N.W.2d 641
Highlight: Ex parte communications are those that are without notice and opportunity for all parties to participate in the communication. |
|
Disciplinary Board v. Vela
699 N.W.2d 839 Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered. |
|
Disciplinary Board v. Wilkes
673 N.W.2d 614 Highlight: Interim suspension of lawyer ordered. |
|
Howes v. Kelly Services, Inc.
649 N.W.2d 218
Highlight: In considering a motion for judgment as a matter of law, a trial court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and must accept the truth of the evidence presented by the non-moving party and the truth of all reasonable inferences from that evidence which supports the verdict. |
|
Petition to Change Resident Chambers from Watford City to Minot
643 N.W.2d 1 Highlight: Judgeship transferred from Watford City to Minot. |
|
Mau, et al. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh
610 N.W.2d 761 |
|
Interest of J.S. (CONFIDENTIAL-M.H.)
621 N.W.2d 582
Highlight: Expedited appeals under the mental health law are limited to the procedures, findings, and conclusions of the lower court. Because of this limited review, detailed findings are necessary. |
|
Disciplinary Board v. Keller
613 N.W.2d 510 Highlight: Interim suspension of lawyer ordered. |
|
Disciplinary Board v. Bard
430 N.W.2d 062 |
|
State v. Hanson
558 N.W.2d 611 |
|
Scott v. ND Dept. of Transportation
557 N.W.2d 385 |
|
Goodleft (Myrtle) v. Gullickson (Philip)
556 N.W.2d 303 |
|
State v. Asbridge
555 N.W.2d 571 |
|
American Insurance Co. v. Midwest Motor Express
554 N.W.2d 182 |
|
Diocese of Bismarck Trust, et al. v. Ramada Inc., et al. (Con. w/950380)
553 N.W.2d 760 |
|
Bangen, et al. v. Bartelson, et al.
553 N.W.2d 754 |
|
Hendrickson v. Hendrickson
553 N.W.2d 215 |
|
Swanson v. ND Workers Comp., et al.
553 N.W.2d 209 |
|
Earthworks, Inc. v. Sehn (Kevin)
553 N.W.2d 490 |
|
Grinaker v. Grinaker (Cross reference w/950354)
553 N.W.2d 204 |
|
Grinaker v. Grinaker, et al. (Cross Ref. w/960035 - see memo)
553 N.W.2d 200 |
|
Kristianson v. Flying J Oil & Gas, Inc.
553 N.W.2d 186 |
|
Kinney Shoe Corp. v. State ex rel. Hanson
552 N.W.2d 788 |
|
Richmond v. Nodland, et al.
552 N.W.2d 586 |
|
State v. Thompson
552 N.W.2d 386 |
|
Fahlsing v. Teters, et al.
552 N.W.2d 087 |
|
City of Jamestown v. Leevers Supermarkets, et al. (Consolidated w/950366)
552 N.W.2d 365 |
|
State v. Olson
552 N.W.2d 362 |
|
State v. Steinmetz
552 N.W.2d 358 |
|
State v. Winkler (CONSOLIDATED W/ 950371)
552 N.W.2d 347 |
|
State v. Storbakken
552 N.W.2d 078 |
|
City of Grand Forks v. Dohman
552 N.W.2d 069 |
|
City of Fargo v. Ness, et al. (Cross Ref. w/940332)
551 N.W.2d 790 |
|
Walton, et al. v. ND Dept. of Human Services, et al.
552 N.W.2d 336 |
|
Raboin, et al. v. ND Dept. of Human Services
552 N.W.2d 329 |
|
Kjos, f/k/a Brandenburger v. Brandenburger
552 N.W.2d 063 |