Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
851 - 900 of 12382 results
|
Knapp v. The Jones Financial Co., et al.
2022 ND 187 Highlight: Rule 43 of the North Dakota Rules of Appellate Procedure is intended to provide a mechanism for substitution of a party who dies after proceedings in the district court have concluded. Under Rule 43(a)(3), an attorney may file a notice of appeal on behalf of a decedent if he or she was “entitled to appeal” before dying. If a party dies during proceedings in the district court—i.e., before the party is entitled to appeal, North Dakota Rule of Civil Procedure 25 applies. |
|
Knapp v. The Jones Financial Co., et al.
2022 ND 187 |
|
Goff v. NDDOT
2022 ND 186
Highlight: The public does not have a right of access to a private parking lot for vehicular use when the lot is marked “private property” and a city ordinance makes such use unlawful when so marked. |
|
Goff v. NDDOT
2022 ND 186 |
|
Richardson v. Richardson, et al.
2022 ND 185 Highlight: A district court order denying a motion to modify residential responsibility and denying a motion to reconsider is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7) and (4). |
|
Richardson v. Richardson, et al.
2022 ND 185 |
|
State v. Vickerman
2022 ND 184
Highlight: A hearsay statement may be admitted as an exception if it illustrates the declarant’s state of mind, is relevant to the criminal act in question, and shows a defendant’s motive to engage in that act. |
|
State v. Vickerman
2022 ND 184 |
|
Wilkinson, et al. v. Bd. of University and School Lands of the State of N.D.
2022 ND 183
Highlight: A person bringing a claim against the State for an injury shall present to the director of the office of management and budget within 180 days after the alleged injury is discovered or reasonably should have been discovered a written notice. |
|
Wilkinson, et al. v. Bd. of University and School Lands of the State of N.D.
2022 ND 183 |
|
Northern Oil & Gas v. EOG Resources, et al.
2022 ND 182
Highlight: A transfer in writing is called a grant. A grant takes effect upon its delivery. For a delivery to occur, a grantor must intend to pass title. Delivery of a grant with intent that title transfer upon some contingency or condition is prohibited. A conditional delivery is absolute. |
|
Northern Oil & Gas v. EOG Resources, et al.
2022 ND 182 |
|
State v. Wilson
2022 ND 181 Highlight: A criminal judgment entered following a jury verdict is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7). |
|
State v. Wilson
2022 ND 181 |
|
Schmidt v. Hageness, et al.
2022 ND 180 Highlight: Dismissal of complaint alleging quiet title to land is summarily affirmed under N.D.C.C. § 32-17-01 because warranty deed failed to meet requirements under N.D.C.C. § 47-10-05. |
|
Schmidt v. Hageness, et al.
2022 ND 180 |
|
Schmidt v. Hageness, et al.
2022 ND 179
Highlight: Dismissal of complaint alleging quiet title to land is summarily affirmed under N.D.C.C. § 32-17-01 because warranty deed failed to meet requirements under N.D.C.C. § 47-10-05. |
|
Schmidt v. Hageness, et al.
2022 ND 179 |
|
Queen v. Martel, et al.
2022 ND 178 Highlight: An award of equal residential responsibility of a minor child is remanded to the district court to make specific findings of fact on whether the domestic violence rebuttable presumption under N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.2(1)(j) is triggered and, if so, whether the presumption is rebutted. |
|
Queen v. Martel, et al.
2022 ND 178 |
|
Rekow v. Durheim
2022 ND 177 Highlight: A petitioner for a disorderly conduct restraining order must allege specific facts or threats showing the acts are intended to affect the petitioner's safety, security, or privacy. |
|
Rekow v. Durheim
2022 ND 177 |
|
State v. Pieper
2022 ND 176 Highlight: A criminal judgment of driving under the influence and driving under suspension is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P.35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
|
State v. Pieper
2022 ND 176 |
|
State v. Lockwood (consolidated w/20220020 & 20220021)
2022 ND 175 Highlight: Three amended criminal judgments are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(8) because the appellant’s brief did not contain the minimum requirements of N.D.R.App.P. 28. |
|
State v. Lockwood (consolidated w/20220020 & 20220021)
2022 ND 175 |
|
Interest of T.L.E. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2022 ND 174 Highlight: A district court’s orders for continuing hospitalization and involuntary treatment with medication are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Interest of T.L.E. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2022 ND 174 |
|
Mayo v. Buchholz, et al.
2022 ND 173 Highlight: A district court order and amended judgment modifying parenting time is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(8). |
|
Mayo v. Buchholz, et al.
2022 ND 173 |
|
Gomm v. Winterfeldt, et al.
2022 ND 172
Highlight: Jurisdiction to modify an existing child custody determination is made independent from registration and enforcement of a foreign determination. |
|
Gomm v. Winterfeldt, et al.
2022 ND 172 |
|
Whitetail Wave v. XTO Energy, et al.
2022 ND 171
Highlight: There is no right to appeal when there is not a final judgment. |
|
Whitetail Wave v. XTO Energy, et al.
2022 ND 171 |
|
Interest of A.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2022 ND 169
Highlight: While this Court defers to a tribe on its membership determinations, without consistent and clear factual findings supporting the application of ICWA and North Dakota heightened review for Indian families, this Court is unable to determine the father’s issues on appeal. |
|
Hendrix, et al. v. Jaeger
2022 ND 168 Highlight: The Secretary of State misapplies the law by excluding qualified elector signatures on circulated petitions on the basis of a determination that a pattern of likely notary violations on some petitions permitted the wholesale invalidation of all signatures on all petitions that were sworn before the same notary. |
|
Hendrix, et al. v. Jaeger
2022 ND 168 |
|
Interest of J.G. (CONFIDENTIAL) (consolidated w/20220190)
2022 ND 167 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
|
Interest of J.G. (CONFIDENTIAL) (consolidated w/20220190)
2022 ND 167 |
|
Newfield Exploration Company, et al. v. State, et al.
2022 ND 166
Highlight: An obligation arises from the parties’ contract or the operation of law. |
|
Newfield Exploration Company, et al. v. State, et al.
2022 ND 166 |
|
Kershaw v. Finnson, et al.
2022 ND 165
Highlight: Contradictory testimony is resolved in favor of affirmance on appeal. |
|
Kershaw v. Finnson, et al.
2022 ND 165 |
|
Sholy v. Cass Cty. Comm’n
2022 ND 164 Highlight: An appeal from a decision of a county commission must be made within thirty days of the decision under N.D.C.C. § 28-34-01(1). The time to appeal commences when the commission votes to approve the decision. |
|
Sholy v. Cass Cty. Comm’n
2022 ND 164 |
|
Vogt v. State
2022 ND 163
Highlight: The North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure are applicable in post-conviction relief proceedings to the extent they do not conflict with the Uniform Postconviction Procedure Act. |
|
Vogt v. State
2022 ND 163 |
|
State v. Doglod
2022 ND 162 Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a jury found the defendant guilty of terrorizing and criminal trespass is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a). |
|
State v. Doglod
2022 ND 162 |
|
Dieterle v. Dieterle n/k/a Hansen, et al.
2022 ND 161
Highlight: Orders denying a party permission to file new motions are not appealable. |