Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
951 - 1000 of 12358 results
Interest of A.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2022 ND 123
Highlight: While this Court defers to a tribe on its membership determinations, without consistent and clear factual findings supporting the application of ICWA and North Dakota heightened review for Indian families, this Court is unable to determine the father’s issues on appeal. |
Interest of A.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2022 ND 123 |
Lehnerz, et al. v. Christopher
2022 ND 122
Highlight: A disorderly conduct restraining order is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. |
Lehnerz, et al. v. Christopher
2022 ND 122 |
State v. Frohlich
2022 ND 121 Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a jury found a defendant guilty of gross sexual imposition is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Frohlich
2022 ND 121 |
State v. Tergesen
2022 ND 120 Highlight: A district court’s restitution order is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
State v. Tergesen
2022 ND 120 |
Blue Appaloosa v. NDIC
2022 ND 119
Highlight: The Industrial Commission’s jurisdiction does not depend solely on the filing of an application, but instead on the jurisdictional fact of intent. The Commission has the authority and duty to investigate potential violations of its regulations, including a failure to obtain a permit or file a bond. |
Blue Appaloosa v. NDIC
2022 ND 119 |
Larson v. WSI
2022 ND 118
Highlight: An appellant must satisfy statutory requirements for perfecting an appeal to the district court from an administrative agency decision for the court to have subject matter jurisdiction. |
Larson v. WSI
2022 ND 118 |
Gonzalez v. State
2022 ND 117
Highlight: Post-judgment motions following a judgment denying post-conviction relief will be treated as another application for post-conviction relief. |
Gonzalez v. State
2022 ND 117 |
Wickham v. State
2022 ND 116
Highlight: A comment on a defendant’s post-arrest silence is an improper comment on the right to remain silent in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. |
Wickham v. State
2022 ND 116 |
Schaff v. State
2022 ND 115 Highlight: An order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Schaff v. State
2022 ND 115 |
Atkins v. State
2022 ND 114 Highlight: An order denying an application for postconviction relief and a pre-filing order under N.D. Sup. Ct. Admin. R. 58 concluding the applicant is a vexatious litigant are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
Atkins v. State
2022 ND 114 |
Schmitz v. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners
2022 ND 113
Highlight: A formal, evidentiary hearing is required whenever an administrative agency acts in a quasi-judicial capacity unless the parties either agree otherwise or there is no dispute of a material fact. |
Schmitz v. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners
2022 ND 113 |
State v. Kelly (consolidated w/ 20210350)
2022 ND 112 Highlight: Criminal judgments entered after the defendant pleaded guilty to driving under the influence, fourth or greater offense, are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7) and (8). |
State v. Kelly (consolidated w/ 20210350)
2022 ND 112 |
West Dakota Oil v. Kathrein Trucking, et al.
2022 ND 111
Highlight: The owner of a limited liability company generally is not liable for the company’s debts, obligations, or other liabilities. |
West Dakota Oil v. Kathrein Trucking, et al.
2022 ND 111 |
Anderson v. Spitzer, et al.
2022 ND 110
Highlight: A district court may modify residential responsibility if it finds a material change in circumstances and modification is necessary to serve the best interests of the child. |
Anderson v. Spitzer, et al.
2022 ND 110 |
In the Matter of the Adoption of K.M.T. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2022 ND 109
Highlight: Parental rights may be terminated upon a finding of abandonment. |
In the Matter of the Adoption of K.M.T. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2022 ND 109 |
Matter of Didier
2022 ND 108 Highlight: A district court’s order denying an application for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Matter of Didier
2022 ND 108 |
State v. Landrus
2022 ND 107
Highlight: This Court may consider an obvious error that affects substantial rights. |
State v. Landrus
2022 ND 107 |
State v. Yellow Hammer
2022 ND 106 Highlight: Future medical expenses may be awarded as restitution to a crime victim if the amount can be ascertained from the evidence presented at a restitution hearing. |
State v. Yellow Hammer
2022 ND 106 |
Rath v. Rath, et al.
2022 ND 105
Highlight: A district court has broad discretion on evidentiary matters and over the conduct of a hearing. A ruling on a motion in limine is reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard. |
Rath v. Rath, et al.
2022 ND 105 |
Toman Engineering Co. v. Koch Construction, et al.
2022 ND 104
Highlight: The district court may exercise its inherent power to sanction when a party violates the duty to preserve evidence and destroys evidence relevant to the lawsuit. |
Toman Engineering Co. v. Koch Construction, et al.
2022 ND 104 |
Matter of Shane Lance Yates
2022 ND 103 Highlight: District court orders denying petitions for name changes and requests for evidentiary hearings are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Matter of Shane Lance Yates
2022 ND 103 |
Matter of Amy Jo Yates
2022 ND 103 Highlight: District court orders denying petitions for name changes and requests for evidentiary hearings are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Matter of Amy Jo Yates
2022 ND 103 |
State v. Rodriguez
2022 ND 102
Highlight: A district court’s dismissal of a criminal information is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. |
State v. Rodriguez
2022 ND 102 |
State v. Benter
2022 ND 101
Highlight: To represent oneself, a criminal defendant must voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waive the right to counsel. |
State v. Benter
2022 ND 101 |
State v. Koval
2022 ND 100 Highlight: When a party challenges an underlying order prohibiting contact in a proceeding for violating that order, the challenge constitutes an impermissible collateral attack on the underlying order. |
State v. Koval
2022 ND 100 |