Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
1001 - 1050 of 12359 results
State v. Koval
2022 ND 100 |
Updike v. Updike, et al.
2022 ND 99 Highlight: An underemployed child support obligor did not provide evidence to establish the N.D. Admin. Code § 75-02-04.1-07(5) exception for imputation of income based on the unavailability of employment applied. |
Updike v. Updike, et al.
2022 ND 99 |
WSI v. Boechler, PC, et al.
2022 ND 98
Highlight: A dismissal without prejudice is ordinarily not appealable because either side may commence another action. |
WSI v. Boechler, PC, et al.
2022 ND 98 |
Wheeler v. State (consolidated w/20220025 & 20220026)
2022 ND 97 Highlight: A district court’s N.D. Sup. Ct. Admin. R. 58 vexatious litigant pre-filing order is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
Wheeler v. State (consolidated w/20220025 & 20220026)
2022 ND 97 |
State v. Houle
2022 ND 96
Highlight: A party may not challenge as error a ruling or other trial proceeding invited by that party. |
State v. Houle
2022 ND 96 |
State v. Oshiro (consolidated w/20210255 & 20210256)
2022 ND 95 Highlight: A defendant’s release from prison renders his sentencing appeal moot if he is not subject to supervised release or probation after completing his prison term. |
State v. Oshiro (consolidated w/20210255 & 20210256)
2022 ND 95 |
City of West Fargo v. McAllister
2022 ND 94
Highlight: The primary purpose of statutory interpretation is to determine legislative intent. |
City of West Fargo v. McAllister
2022 ND 94 |
State v. Ruiz Ledezma
2022 ND 93 Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a defendant pled guilty to criminal vehicular homicide is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
State v. Ruiz Ledezma
2022 ND 93 |
Matter of Rose Henderson Peterson Mineral Trust
2022 ND 92
Highlight: Satisfaction of an independent undisputed portion of a judgment does not operate as a full waiver of the right to appeal. |
Matter of Rose Henderson Peterson Mineral Trust
2022 ND 92 |
Eikom v. Eikom
2022 ND 91
Highlight: A district court’s decision to award parenting time to a noncustodial parent is based on the child’s best interests and not the wishes of the parents. |
Eikom v. Eikom
2022 ND 91 |
Dixon v. Dixon
2022 ND 90 Highlight: District court order discharging trustee, closing the trust, and concluding supervised administration is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Dixon v. Dixon
2022 ND 90 |
Matter of Emelia Hirsch Trust
2022 ND 89
Highlight: A district court pre-filing order against vexatious litigant under N.D. Sup. Ct. Admin. R. 58 is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. |
Matter of Emelia Hirsch Trust
2022 ND 89 |
Eckroth v. Eckroth, et al.
2022 ND 88 Highlight: An order denying a motion to modify primary residential responsibility and an order denying a motion for reconsideration are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
Eckroth v. Eckroth, et al.
2022 ND 88 |
Trenton Indian Housing Authority v. Poitra, et al.
2022 ND 87
Highlight: This Court adopts the two-part review articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government, 522 U.S. 520 (1998) to determine whether land is a dependent Indian community and therefore Indian country. |
Trenton Indian Housing Authority v. Poitra, et al.
2022 ND 87 |
Sauvageau, et al. v. Bailey, et al.
2022 ND 86
Highlight: This Court exercises its supervisory authority rarely and cautiously, and only to rectify errors and prevent injustice in extraordinary cases when no adequate alternative remedy exists. |
Sauvageau, et al. v. Bailey, et al.
2022 ND 86 |
Energy Transfer, et al. v. ND Private Investigative and Security Bd., et al.
2022 ND 85
Highlight: A person has standing to appeal from an order denying intervention. |
Energy Transfer, et al. v. ND Private Investigative and Security Bd., et al.
2022 ND 85 |
Energy Transfer, et al. v. ND Private Investigative and Security Bd., et al.
2022 ND 84
Highlight: An interlocutory order is only appealable when there is a statutory basis for the appeal and the district court has complied with the requirements of N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b). |
Energy Transfer, et al. v. ND Private Investigative and Security Bd., et al.
2022 ND 84 |
Hudye Group v. Ward Cty. Bd. of Commissioners
2022 ND 83
Highlight: A local governing body’s decision on tax rebate and abatement applications is reviewed under the arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable standard. |
Hudye Group v. Ward Cty. Bd. of Commissioners
2022 ND 83 |
Bridges v. State (consolidated w/20210352)
2022 ND 82 Highlight: Orders summarily dismissing applications for postconviction relief are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
Bridges v. State (consolidated w/20210352)
2022 ND 82 |
Etemad v. State
2022 ND 81 Highlight: A district court order denying an amended application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Etemad v. State
2022 ND 81 |
Moncada v. State
2022 ND 80 Highlight: A district court order summarily dismissing an application for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Moncada v. State
2022 ND 80 |
Solberg v. Hennessy
2022 ND 79 Highlight: Amended judgment entered after a bench trial summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (2). |
Solberg v. Hennessy
2022 ND 79 |
State v. Hultberg
2022 ND 78 Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a jury found the defendant guilty of indecent exposure is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
State v. Hultberg
2022 ND 78 |
Hoff v. State
2022 ND 77 Highlight: A district court order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Hoff v. State
2022 ND 77 |
Ali v. State
2022 ND 76 Highlight: If the State moves for summary dismissal of an application for postconviction relief, the applicant must present competent admissible evidence which raises a genuine issue of material fact. |
Ali v. State
2022 ND 76 |
Schultz v. DeClusin
2022 ND 75 Highlight: An amended judgment and money judgment awarding a parent primary residential responsibility and attorney’s fees is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |