Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2051 - 2100 of 12382 results
State v. Strom
2019 ND 9 Highlight: When ordering restitution for a victim of a criminal act, district courts must not consider the defendant’s ability to pay under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-08(1). North Dakota Constitution article I, § 25(1)(n) requires “full” restitution be awarded to the victim for “all losses” sustained. This amendment to the constitution implicitly repealed the statutory requirement to consider ability to pay. |
Interest of D.M.W. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2019 ND 8 Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
State, et al. v. McGath
2019 ND 7 Highlight: An appeal from a divorce judgment is summarily affirmed under Koenig v. Schuh, 2016 ND 252, 888 N.W.2d 385, and N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4), and (7). |
State v. Simundson
2019 ND 6 Highlight: Summary affirmance of jury conviction for actual physical control under N.D.C.C. § 39-08-01. |
Lunde v. Paulson
2019 ND 5 Highlight: Summarily affirm default judgment based on a lack of errors appearing on the face of the judgment roll. |
Schwab v. State
2019 ND 4
Highlight: An appeal from a district court’s order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Interest of P.T.D. (CONFIDENTIAL) (consolidated w/20180193-20180196)
2019 ND 3 Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order finding five children to be deprived is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
DeLong v. Shields, et al.
2019 ND 2 Highlight: A district court’s award of unsupervised parenting time is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Berg v. North Dakota State Board of Registration (cons.w/20170414 cont. in memo)
2018 ND 274
Highlight: In reviewing an administrative agency’s findings of fact, the Supreme Court does not make independent findings of fact or substitute its judgment for that of the agency. |
Bakke v. Magi-Touch Carpet One Floor & Home, Inc., et al.
2018 ND 273
Highlight: An employer of an independent contractor generally is not liable for the negligence of the independent contractor. |
City of Grand Forks v. Barendt
2018 ND 272 Highlight: The implied consent advisory under N.D.C.C. 39-20-01(3) must be read after placing an individual under arrest and before administering a chemical test to determine alcohol concentration or the presence of other drugs. |
Dale Exploration, LLC, et al. v. Hiepler, et al.
2018 ND 271
Highlight: The settlor of an irrevocable trust with the power to remove trust property must convey mineral interests that he sold in an individual capacity while the property was titled under the trust. |
Lechner v. WSI, et al.
2018 ND 270
Highlight: A claim for workers’ compensation benefits must be filed within one year after the injury. |
State v. Vollrath
2018 ND 269 Highlight: Once a judgment is final, a district court generally no longer has jurisdiction to alter, amend, or modify that judgment. |
Rustad v. Baumgartner
2018 ND 268 Highlight: A parenting plan is clearly erroneous when it denies a parent overnights or extended summer visitation without evidence of endangerment to the child’s physical or emotional health. |
State ex rel. City of Marion v. Alber
2018 ND 267 Highlight: Under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b), a district court cannot amend an order to impose further affirmative relief. If an amendment grants no further relief but merely more clearly articulates the same substantive relief, it may be made under Rule 60(a) at any time. |
State v. White
2018 ND 266 Highlight: The warrantless search of supervised probationer’s home is reasonable under totality of the circumstances and does not violate Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable search and seizure. |
Adoption of A.S. (CONFIDENTIAL)(consolidated w/ 20180327)
2018 ND 265
Highlight: A district court's findings of fact in a termination of parental rights proceeding will not be reversed on appeal unless they are clearly erroneous. |
Stein v. State
2018 ND 264
Highlight: A district court may summarily dismiss an application for post-conviction relief if there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. |
Dahms, et al. v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co., et al.
2018 ND 263
Highlight: A detached garage connected to a dwelling by a deck constituted an “other structure” rather than a “dwelling” for purposes of determining insurance coverage. |
State, et al. v. Martin
2018 ND 262 Highlight: District court did not err in denying a Rule 60(b) motion for relief from judgment where party was properly provided notice and served with the motion for default judgment. |
Hunts Along v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2018 ND 261
Highlight: Department did not err in revoking defendant’s drivers license under N.D.C.C. § 39-20-14 following defendant’s refusal of on-site breath test. |
Matter of Kulink
2018 ND 260 Highlight: A district court order denying discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) |
Schultz v. Schultz
2018 ND 259
Highlight: There is no bright-line rule to distinguish between short and long-term marriages. |
Green v. Swiers
2018 ND 258
Highlight: A district court’s decision on a motion to relocate is a finding of fact, which will not be reversed on appeal unless it is clearly erroneous. |
Interest of A.L.E. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 257
Highlight: Prenatal exposure to any controlled substance is a ground for a finding of deprivation. |
State v. Bornsen
2018 ND 256
Highlight: Investigatory traffic stops are valid when the officer conducting the stop had a reasonable and articulable suspicion the motorist has violated or is violating the law. |
LeClair v. Sorel
2018 ND 255
Highlight: The implied consent advisory provided to a driver after an arrest for driving under the influence must be substantively complete. |
State v. Ferderer
2018 ND 254 Highlight: A revocation of a sentence for a probation violation does not violate double jeopardy. |
Tornabeni v. Wold, et al.
2018 ND 253
Highlight: The existence and terms of an oral contract are findings of fact subject to the clearly erroneous rule. |
State v. Hebert
2018 ND 252 Highlight: A criminal judgment convicting the defendant of tampering or damaging a public service is summarily reversed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(b). |
Sabot v. State
2018 ND 251 Highlight: Summary dismissal of post-conviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Interest of D.V.A. (Confidential)
2018 ND 250 Highlight: A district court order denying discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Mejia
2018 ND 249
Highlight: Summary affirmance is appropriate when there is sufficient evidence to support a guilty verdict. |
Sorlie v. Sorlie
2018 ND 248 Highlight: A district court’s award of residential responsibility is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Johnston Law Office, P.C. v. Brakke, et al.
2018 ND 247 Highlight: If a party moving for summary judgment meets its initial burden of showing there are no genuine issues of material fact and it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, the party opposing the motion must present competent admissible evidence to show the existence of a genuine issue of material fact. |
Petition to Permit Temporary Provision of Legal Services
2018 ND 246 Highlight: Order on petition for temporary lawyer practice. |
Petition to Permit Temporary Provision of Legal Services
2018 ND 246 Highlight: Order on petition for temporary lawyer practice. |
Petition to Permit Temporary Provision of Legal Services
2018 ND 246 Highlight: Order on petition for temporary lawyer practice. |
Thompson, et al. v. Molde, et al.
2018 ND 245
Highlight: Summary judgment allows for the prompt resolution of a controversy on the merits without a trial if there are no disputed issues of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. |
State v. Rogers
2018 ND 244 Highlight: Defendant appeals from a district court judgment for gross sexual imposition. Because the district court did not make individualized findings supporting closure of the competency hearing under Waller, the Sixth Amendment public trial guarantee wasviolated. The restitution award was proper and it is affirmed consistent with our remand. We remand for further proceedings. |
Upton v. Nolan
2018 ND 243
Highlight: Although a district court has continuing jurisdiction to modify parenting time, due process requires a parent receive adequate notice and a fair opportunity to be heard. |
State v. Sanchez (consolidated w/20180064)
2018 ND 242 Highlight: A district court may extend on its own a self-imposed deadline for scheduling or holding a restitution hearing. |
State v. Jessee
2018 ND 241
Highlight: Questions of fact in a criminal bench trial are reviewed in the same manner as questions of fact in a criminal jury trial. |
State v. Etemad
2018 ND 240
Highlight: A district court judgment entered after a jury found Etemad guilty of terrorizing is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7). |
Pederson v. State
2018 ND 239 Highlight: Judgment denying motion for relief under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) and application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
Marler v. Martin, et al.
2018 ND 238
Highlight: A judgment and order denying a motion for a new trial are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
City of Fargo v. Nelson
2018 ND 237 Highlight: Civil judgment finding appellant's property constitutes a public nuisance, requiring abatement of the nuisance, and granting a permanent injunction from maintaining a nuisance on the property is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4),(7). |
Interest of G.F. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 236 Highlight: Juvenile court order terminating parental rights under N.D.C.C. 27-20-44(1)(c)(1) and N.D.C.C. 27-20-44(1)(c)(2) is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Guardianship/Conservatorship of M.J.K.
2018 ND 235
Highlight: District Court’s finding that the ward fails to make a prima facie case to terminate guardianship is summarily affirmed under N.D.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |