Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2051 - 2100 of 12359 results
Schultz v. Schultz
2018 ND 259
Highlight: There is no bright-line rule to distinguish between short and long-term marriages. |
Green v. Swiers
2018 ND 258
Highlight: A district court’s decision on a motion to relocate is a finding of fact, which will not be reversed on appeal unless it is clearly erroneous. |
Interest of A.L.E. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 257
Highlight: Prenatal exposure to any controlled substance is a ground for a finding of deprivation. |
State v. Bornsen
2018 ND 256
Highlight: Investigatory traffic stops are valid when the officer conducting the stop had a reasonable and articulable suspicion the motorist has violated or is violating the law. |
LeClair v. Sorel
2018 ND 255
Highlight: The implied consent advisory provided to a driver after an arrest for driving under the influence must be substantively complete. |
State v. Ferderer
2018 ND 254 Highlight: A revocation of a sentence for a probation violation does not violate double jeopardy. |
Tornabeni v. Wold, et al.
2018 ND 253
Highlight: The existence and terms of an oral contract are findings of fact subject to the clearly erroneous rule. |
State v. Hebert
2018 ND 252 Highlight: A criminal judgment convicting the defendant of tampering or damaging a public service is summarily reversed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(b). |
Sabot v. State
2018 ND 251 Highlight: Summary dismissal of post-conviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Interest of D.V.A. (Confidential)
2018 ND 250 Highlight: A district court order denying discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Mejia
2018 ND 249
Highlight: Summary affirmance is appropriate when there is sufficient evidence to support a guilty verdict. |
Sorlie v. Sorlie
2018 ND 248 Highlight: A district court’s award of residential responsibility is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Johnston Law Office, P.C. v. Brakke, et al.
2018 ND 247 Highlight: If a party moving for summary judgment meets its initial burden of showing there are no genuine issues of material fact and it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, the party opposing the motion must present competent admissible evidence to show the existence of a genuine issue of material fact. |
Petition to Permit Temporary Provision of Legal Services
2018 ND 246 Highlight: Order on petition for temporary lawyer practice. |
Petition to Permit Temporary Provision of Legal Services
2018 ND 246 Highlight: Order on petition for temporary lawyer practice. |
Petition to Permit Temporary Provision of Legal Services
2018 ND 246 Highlight: Order on petition for temporary lawyer practice. |
Thompson, et al. v. Molde, et al.
2018 ND 245
Highlight: Summary judgment allows for the prompt resolution of a controversy on the merits without a trial if there are no disputed issues of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. |
State v. Rogers
2018 ND 244 Highlight: Defendant appeals from a district court judgment for gross sexual imposition. Because the district court did not make individualized findings supporting closure of the competency hearing under Waller, the Sixth Amendment public trial guarantee wasviolated. The restitution award was proper and it is affirmed consistent with our remand. We remand for further proceedings. |
Upton v. Nolan
2018 ND 243
Highlight: Although a district court has continuing jurisdiction to modify parenting time, due process requires a parent receive adequate notice and a fair opportunity to be heard. |
State v. Sanchez (consolidated w/20180064)
2018 ND 242 Highlight: A district court may extend on its own a self-imposed deadline for scheduling or holding a restitution hearing. |
State v. Jessee
2018 ND 241
Highlight: Questions of fact in a criminal bench trial are reviewed in the same manner as questions of fact in a criminal jury trial. |
State v. Etemad
2018 ND 240
Highlight: A district court judgment entered after a jury found Etemad guilty of terrorizing is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7). |
Pederson v. State
2018 ND 239 Highlight: Judgment denying motion for relief under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) and application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
Marler v. Martin, et al.
2018 ND 238
Highlight: A judgment and order denying a motion for a new trial are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
City of Fargo v. Nelson
2018 ND 237 Highlight: Civil judgment finding appellant's property constitutes a public nuisance, requiring abatement of the nuisance, and granting a permanent injunction from maintaining a nuisance on the property is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4),(7). |
Interest of G.F. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 236 Highlight: Juvenile court order terminating parental rights under N.D.C.C. 27-20-44(1)(c)(1) and N.D.C.C. 27-20-44(1)(c)(2) is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Guardianship/Conservatorship of M.J.K.
2018 ND 235
Highlight: District Court’s finding that the ward fails to make a prima facie case to terminate guardianship is summarily affirmed under N.D.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
McGath v. Waide
2018 ND 234 Highlight: A district court disorderly conduct restraining order is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
Prairie Winds Apartments 1, LLC v. Stark County Board of Commissioners (cons
2018 ND 233 Highlight: To properly appeal a board of county commissioners’ decision relating to tax matters, a landowner must file a notice of appeal on a board member and the state tax commissioner within thirty days of the board’s decision. |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 2, East Central Judicial District
2018 ND 232 |
Knapp v. Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Revenue, et al.
2018 ND 231 Highlight: A court may issue a writ of prohibition to prevent an inferior tribunal from acting without or in excess of jurisdiction when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. |
State v. Schlieve
2018 ND 230
Highlight: Judgment revoking probation and sentencing defendant to five years imprisonment summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
State v. Brown (consol. w/ 20180092)
2018 ND 229
Highlight: A district court decision to dismiss a criminal charge is reviewed for abuse of discretion. |
Cass County Joint Water Resource District v. Erickson, et al.
2018 ND 228
Highlight: An owner whose property has been taken by condemnation is entitled to compensation for the property at the highest and best use. |
Johnson, et al. v. Statoil Oil & Gas LP, et al.
2018 ND 227
Highlight: Pugh clauses require an individualized analysis. |
Korb v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2018 ND 226
Highlight: Accurate additional language provided by an officer does not alter the sufficiency of a complete, accurate implied consent advisory under N.D.C.C. § 39-20-01(3). |
State v. Wallace
2018 ND 225
Highlight: Before accepting a guilty plea, the district court must inform the defendant of and determine that the defendant understands any mandatory minimum penalty, including any mandatory minimum term of probation. |
DeForest v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2018 ND 224 Highlight: District court judgment finding an incomplete implied consent advisory and reversing the suspension of driver’s license is reversed. The Department’s decision is affirmed, and the appellee’s driving privileges are suspended for 91 days. |
IRET Properties, et al. v. Williams County Board of Commissioners
2018 ND 223 Highlight: Motion to dismiss granted. |
Interest of S.R. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 222 Highlight: An appeal from a district court order granting Prairie St. John’s Hospital’s request to involuntarily treat S.R. with prescription medication is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Estate of Moore
2018 ND 221
Highlight: A contract’s language governs its interpretation if the language is clear and explicit and does not involve an absurdity. |
Tamba v. State
2018 ND 220 Highlight: Order denying post-conviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Borsheim Builders Supply, Inc. v. Manger Insurance, Inc., et al.
2018 ND 218
Highlight: Summary judgment is a procedural device for the prompt resolution of a controversy on the merits without a trial if there are no genuine issues of material fact or inferences that can reasonably be drawn from undisputed facts, or if the only issues to be resolved are questions of law. |
State v. Wangstad
2018 ND 217
Highlight: It is not obvious error for a district court to admit into evidence statements concerning a defendant’s prior bad acts at the defendant’s request. |
State v. Bohe
2018 ND 216
Highlight: If a law enforcement officer fails to provide a driver the complete statutory implied consent advisory after the defendant’s arrest and before the driver’s submission to the chemical test, the result is inadmissible in any criminal or administrative proceeding. |
State v. Seidel
2018 ND 215
Highlight: A district court may impose both a maximum probation sentence and a maximum imprisonment sentence for misdemeanors. |
Riskey v. Riskey (consolidated w/20170393)
2018 ND 214
Highlight: A trust is void or subject to reformation by the court to the extent its creation was induced by fraud, duress, or undue influence. |
WSI v. Beaulieu, et al.
2018 ND 213
Highlight: WSI may not issue a permanent impairment award unless identified and quantified within the sixth edition of the American Medical Association’s “Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment.” |
Nelson, et al. v. Nelson
2018 ND 212
Highlight: The determination of mental capacity and whether undue influence exists are ordinarily questions of fact. |
Davies v. State
2018 ND 211
Highlight: Summary disposition is generally inappropriate for post-conviction claims of ineffective assistance of counsel because the underlying record and transcripts do not fully develop the record. |