Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2101 - 2150 of 12382 results
McGath v. Waide
2018 ND 234 Highlight: A district court disorderly conduct restraining order is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
Prairie Winds Apartments 1, LLC v. Stark County Board of Commissioners (cons
2018 ND 233 Highlight: To properly appeal a board of county commissioners’ decision relating to tax matters, a landowner must file a notice of appeal on a board member and the state tax commissioner within thirty days of the board’s decision. |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 2, East Central Judicial District
2018 ND 232 |
Knapp v. Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Revenue, et al.
2018 ND 231 Highlight: A court may issue a writ of prohibition to prevent an inferior tribunal from acting without or in excess of jurisdiction when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. |
State v. Schlieve
2018 ND 230
Highlight: Judgment revoking probation and sentencing defendant to five years imprisonment summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
State v. Brown (consol. w/ 20180092)
2018 ND 229
Highlight: A district court decision to dismiss a criminal charge is reviewed for abuse of discretion. |
Cass County Joint Water Resource District v. Erickson, et al.
2018 ND 228
Highlight: An owner whose property has been taken by condemnation is entitled to compensation for the property at the highest and best use. |
Johnson, et al. v. Statoil Oil & Gas LP, et al.
2018 ND 227
Highlight: Pugh clauses require an individualized analysis. |
Korb v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2018 ND 226
Highlight: Accurate additional language provided by an officer does not alter the sufficiency of a complete, accurate implied consent advisory under N.D.C.C. § 39-20-01(3). |
State v. Wallace
2018 ND 225
Highlight: Before accepting a guilty plea, the district court must inform the defendant of and determine that the defendant understands any mandatory minimum penalty, including any mandatory minimum term of probation. |
DeForest v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2018 ND 224 Highlight: District court judgment finding an incomplete implied consent advisory and reversing the suspension of driver’s license is reversed. The Department’s decision is affirmed, and the appellee’s driving privileges are suspended for 91 days. |
IRET Properties, et al. v. Williams County Board of Commissioners
2018 ND 223 Highlight: Motion to dismiss granted. |
Interest of S.R. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 222 Highlight: An appeal from a district court order granting Prairie St. John’s Hospital’s request to involuntarily treat S.R. with prescription medication is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Estate of Moore
2018 ND 221
Highlight: A contract’s language governs its interpretation if the language is clear and explicit and does not involve an absurdity. |
Tamba v. State
2018 ND 220 Highlight: Order denying post-conviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Borsheim Builders Supply, Inc. v. Manger Insurance, Inc., et al.
2018 ND 218
Highlight: Summary judgment is a procedural device for the prompt resolution of a controversy on the merits without a trial if there are no genuine issues of material fact or inferences that can reasonably be drawn from undisputed facts, or if the only issues to be resolved are questions of law. |
State v. Wangstad
2018 ND 217
Highlight: It is not obvious error for a district court to admit into evidence statements concerning a defendant’s prior bad acts at the defendant’s request. |
State v. Bohe
2018 ND 216
Highlight: If a law enforcement officer fails to provide a driver the complete statutory implied consent advisory after the defendant’s arrest and before the driver’s submission to the chemical test, the result is inadmissible in any criminal or administrative proceeding. |
State v. Seidel
2018 ND 215
Highlight: A district court may impose both a maximum probation sentence and a maximum imprisonment sentence for misdemeanors. |
Riskey v. Riskey (consolidated w/20170393)
2018 ND 214
Highlight: A trust is void or subject to reformation by the court to the extent its creation was induced by fraud, duress, or undue influence. |
WSI v. Beaulieu, et al.
2018 ND 213
Highlight: WSI may not issue a permanent impairment award unless identified and quantified within the sixth edition of the American Medical Association’s “Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment.” |
Nelson, et al. v. Nelson
2018 ND 212
Highlight: The determination of mental capacity and whether undue influence exists are ordinarily questions of fact. |
Davies v. State
2018 ND 211
Highlight: Summary disposition is generally inappropriate for post-conviction claims of ineffective assistance of counsel because the underlying record and transcripts do not fully develop the record. |
Schoon v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2018 ND 210
Highlight: If a law enforcement officer fails to provide a driver the complete statutory implied consent advisory after the defendant’s arrest and before the driver’s submission to the chemical test, the result is inadmissible in any criminal or administrative proceeding. |
State v. Hussein
2018 ND 209
Highlight: A criminal judgment for simple assault on a peace officer is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7). State v. Hannah, 2016 ND 11, ¶ 9, 873 N.W.2d 668. |
State v. Kibble
2018 ND 208 Highlight: Criminal judgment against defendant following a jury verdict of guilty of one count of aggravated assault is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Interest of I.N. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 207
Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Greer v. Global Industries, et al.
2018 ND 206 |
Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. v. Johnson, et al.
2018 ND 205
Highlight: Conclusory allegations in a brief, without citation to any evidence in the record to support the contentions, are insufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact to defeat summary judgment or to show the district court abused its discretion in denying a motion for relief from judgment. |
Tornabeni v. Creech, et al.
2018 ND 204 |
State v. Finneman
2018 ND 203
Highlight: The procedure for transitioning from a charged greater offense to a lesser included offense requires an acquittal for the greater offense before consideration of the lesser included offense. |
Gustafson v. Poitra, et al.
2018 ND 202
Highlight: An express determination on subject matter jurisdiction in a prior action can be given res judicata effect. |
Interest of D.D. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 201 |
Interest of J.B. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 200 |
Knudson v. Knudson
2018 ND 199
Highlight: In a divorce action, the district court must consider the needs of the spouse requesting spousal support and the ability of the other spouse to pay. |
State v. Pickens
2018 ND 198 |
State v. Simon (consol. w/ 20170404)
2018 ND 197 |
State v. Corona
2018 ND 196 |
State v. Rose
2018 ND 195 |
State v. Brickle-Hicks
2018 ND 194 Highlight: A district court’s decision to deny a defendant’s motion to suppress evidence will not be reversed on appeal if there is sufficient competent evidence capable of supporting the court’s findings and if its decision is not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. |
Interest of E.P. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 193 Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Riemers v. Jaeger
2018 ND 192
Highlight: A writ of mandamus may be issued to compel performance of an act which the law specifically enjoins as a duty resulting from an office. |
Interest of M.S.H. (CONFIDENTIAL)(consolidated w/20180173 & 20180174)
2018 ND 191 Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of A.T. (Confidential)
2018 ND 190 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating a mother's parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
N.D. Legislative Assembly, et al. v. Burgum
2018 ND 189
Highlight: The Governor cannot withdraw a veto or otherwise concede it was ineffective. |
Disciplinary Board v. Turcotte
2018 ND 188 Highlight: Lawyer Suspension ordered. |
Disciplinary Board v. Bruhn
2018 ND 187 Highlight: Lawyer Suspension ordered. |
Disciplinary Board v. Bruhn
2018 ND 186 Highlight: Lawyer Suspension ordered. |
State v. Biwer
2018 ND 185
Highlight: Conclusory or bare information is not sufficient for probable cause to obtain a search warrant. |
Kovalevich v. State
2018 ND 184 Highlight: Under N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-01(3)(a)(1), a court may consider an application for post-conviction relief on the basis of newly discovered evidence outside of the general two-year statute of limitations if the petitioner meets the four-pronged test set forth in Greywind v. State, 2004 ND 213, 18, 689 N.W.2d 390. |