Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2151 - 2200 of 12382 results
Johnston Land Company, LLC v. Sorenson, et al.
2018 ND 183
Highlight: A justiciable controversy subject to appellate jurisdiction exists when a district court order does not fully dispose of the petitioner's claims. |
Kalmio v. State
2018 ND 182
Highlight: A district court has discretion to allow amendments to pleadings. |
Interest of Voisine
2018 ND 181
Highlight: When an individual petitions for discharge from commitment as a sexually dangerous individual, the State must prove the individual remains a sexually dangerous individual by clear and convincing evidence. |
Gerrity Bakken, LLC v. Oasis Petroleum North America LLC, et al.
2018 ND 180
Highlight: Deeds must be construed as a whole to give effect to each provision, if reasonably possible. |
Ramirez v. Walmart
2018 ND 179
Highlight: Although an order dismissing a complaint without prejudice is generally not appealable, when a statute of limitations has run, a dismissal without prejudice is appealable because it forecloses litigation in the plaintiff's chosen forum. |
Interest of B.H. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 178
Highlight: The findings in an oral order may control if they are not inconsistent with the written order. |
Bickler, et al. v. Happy House Movers, L.L.P.
2018 ND 177
Highlight: This Court does not consider questions that were not presented to the district court and are raised for the first time on appeal. |
Interest of G.L. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 176
Highlight: After finding a parent has removed the impediments causing a child's initial deprivation leading to a guardianship, the juvenile court must find exceptional circumstances before it may analyze the child's best interests in continuing the guardianship. |
State v. Grant
2018 ND 175 Highlight: Obvious error should be noticed on appeal only in exceptional circumstances and when there was a clear deviation from an applicable legal rule under current law. |
Haider v. Moen
2018 ND 174
Highlight: After requesting the jury to make factual findings relating to treble damages, the district court abuses its discretion by failing to instruct the jury on the statutory treble damages. |
State v. Hunter
2018 ND 173
Highlight: Whether a defendant voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waived his Miranda rights depends on the totality of the circumstances. |
State v. Ngale
2018 ND 172 Highlight: A reserve deputy, who provides services on a non-salaried basis and has full arrest authority, is not required to be licensed to perform peace officer law enforcement duties. |
State v. Blue (consolidated w/20170388)
2018 ND 171
Highlight: Article I, Section 25(1)(n), N.D. Const., and N.D.C.C. 12.1-32-08(1)(b) are not in conflict, and the court must attempt to harmonize a statute and a constitutional provision when possible. |
State, et al. v. Peltier
2018 ND 170 Highlight: A state court has subject matter jurisdiction to decide an Indian father's child support obligation if the action does not infringe on the right of Indian tribes to govern themselves. |
State v. Jorgenson
2018 ND 169
Highlight: Orders approving pretrial diversion and orders of restitution are not appealable under N.D.C.C. § 29-28-06. |
City of Bismarck v. Schaffner
2018 ND 168 Highlight: Entry of a not guilty plea in a criminal bench trial does not preserve the issue of whether city and state laws conflict. |
State v. Vanberkom
2018 ND 167 Highlight: Double jeopardy does not attach when a defendant is assessed an administrative penalty for violation of N.D.C.C. § 39-09-01.1 ("Care required in operating vehicle") and prosecuted for reckless driving under N.D.C.C. § 39-08-03. |
State v. Beltran
2018 ND 166
Highlight: A district court does not err by instructing a jury on the crime of refusal to submit to a chemical test when there is evidence presented indicating the defendant refused to submit to a breath test. |
Interest of J.J.T. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 165 Highlight: A parent's delay and obstruction of the legal process may constitute the functional equivalent of a voluntary, knowing, and intelligent waiver of the right to counsel in a proceeding to terminate parental rights. |
Siana Oil & Gas Co., LLC v. Dublin Co., et al. (consolidated w/20180010)
2018 ND 164
Highlight: A county's tax deed gives it title or color of title to the whole estate in the land including the royalty interests. |
Odom v. State
2018 ND 163 Highlight: Order denying petitioner's application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
State v. Everett, Jr.
2018 ND 162 Highlight: Criminal judgment for gross sexual imposition, and order denying motion for a new trial summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4). |
Butts v. State
2018 ND 161 Highlight: Order denying application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of N.F.F. (CONFIDENTIAL) (consolidated w/20180220 & 20180221)
2018 ND 160 Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Adoption of B.A.T. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 159 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating a father's parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
S&B Dickinson Apartments I, LLC, et al. v. Stark County Board of Commissioners
2018 ND 158
Highlight: For a court to have subject matter jurisdiction over an appeal, the appealing party must meet the statutory requirements for perfecting the appeal. |
State v. Yost (consolidated w/20170359 & 20170360)
2018 ND 157
Highlight: A district court does not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to withdraw guilty pleas where the defendant has not shown manifest injustice or upon finding the State would be substantially prejudiced by withdrawal. |
Agri Industries v. Franson, et al. (Consolidated w/20170412)
2018 ND 156
Highlight: A district court does not err by granting summary judgment to a mineral developer for damage to a water well when the property owner did not comply with N.D.C.C. § 38-11.1-06, which requires a certified water quality test before proceeding with an action. |
State v. Cullett
2018 ND 155 Highlight: A district court judgment entered after a jury found Cullett guilty of terrorizing is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Chase v. State
2018 ND 154 Highlight: A district court's order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Tillich, et al. v. Bruce, et al.
2018 ND 153 Highlight: An award of costs and attorney fees is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
Interest of A.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)(CONSOLIDATED W/20180201)
2018 ND 152 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating a father's parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of Z.F.T. (CONFIDENTIAL)(consolidated w/ 20180182-20180185)
2018 ND 151 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating a mother's and a father's parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Oien v. State
2018 ND 150 Highlight: Judgment denying defendant's application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Matthews v. State
2018 ND 149 Highlight: Judgment summarily dismissing application for post-conviction relief is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
RAD Development-Main Street, LLC v. Leunguen-Koundjo, et al.
2018 ND 148 Highlight: Judgment of eviction is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Kisi
2018 ND 147 Highlight: Criminal judgments for gross sexual imposition and accomplice to attempted murder are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 2, South Central Judicial District
2018 ND 145 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Bismarck. |
Poochigian, et al. v. City of Grand Forks
2018 ND 144 Highlight: A post-election claim challenging pre-election irregularities is rendered moot by the completion of the election. |
Zuraff v. Reiger, et al.
2018 ND 143
Highlight: A district court does not clearly err by concluding the domestic violence presumption under N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.2(1)(j) did not apply because there was insufficient evidence of domestic violence involving serious bodily injury. |
Thompson, et al. v. Johnson
2018 ND 142
Highlight: A correct finding of an obligor's net income is essential to determine the proper amount of child support. |
Morel v. State
2018 ND 141
Highlight: A new rule applies retroactively to final convictions in very limited circumstances. Substantive rules are generally applied retroactively because they carry a significant risk that a defendant stands convicted of an act the law does not make criminal or faces punishment the law cannot impose on him. |
Pettinger v. Carroll
2018 ND 140
Highlight: On review of a summary judgment, if reasonable persons could reach only one conclusion from the facts, issues of fact may become issues of law. |
Interest of B.A.K. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 139 Highlight: A district court clearly errs by finding an individual is a person requiring treatment under N.D.C.C. § 25-03.1-02 when the evidence does not support the conclusion the individual's mental health deterioration would predictably result in dangerousness to the individual, others, or property. |
Rath v. Rath
2018 ND 138
Highlight: The district court has broad discretion over the presentation of evidence and conduct of a trial, in addition to whether to grant a continuance. |
Rourke v. State
2018 ND 137
Highlight: In order to prevail on a post-conviction relief application based on ineffective assistance of counsel, the petitioner must (1) "show that counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness" and (2) "show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." |
Flaten v. Couture, et al.
2018 ND 136
Highlight: If the language of a contract is unambiguous, extrinsic evidence is inadmissible to alter, vary, explain, or change the document. |
State v. Broom
2018 ND 135
Highlight: A law enforcement officer may conduct a frisk, or a pat-down search, of a person only when the officer possesses an articulable suspicion that an individual is armed and dangerous. |
Jensen v. State
2018 ND 134 Highlight: The right to a preliminary hearing is waived when a defendant fails to raise the issue at an arraignment or change of plea hearing and proceeds to plead guilty. |
State v. Erickson
2018 ND 133 Highlight: If an officer's reasonable suspicion is dispelled after lawfully stopping an individual, the officer may make contact with the individual only to briefly explain the reason for the stop. |