Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2851 - 2900 of 12446 results
Schurmann v. Schurmann
2016 ND 69
Highlight: To modify parenting time, the moving party must demonstrate a material change in circumstances has occurred since entry of the previous parenting time order and the modification is in the best interests of the child. |
State v. James
2016 ND 68
Highlight: To justify stopping a moving vehicle for investigation, a law enforcement officer must have a reasonable and articulable suspicion a motorist has violated or is violating the law. |
Matter of K.J.C. (Confidential)
2016 ND 67
Highlight: In termination of parental rights proceedings, the custodial parent's refusal to cooperate with the noncustodial parent's attempts to maintain a relationship with the child is not insignificant in deciding whether the noncustodial parent abandoned the child, but the noncustodial parent must take affirmative steps to perform parental duties and foster a relationship with the child. |
4APM, LLP v. TCI Insurance Agency, Inc.
2016 ND 66
Highlight: Generally, an insurance agent's duty of care to an insured requires the agent to act in good faith and follow instructions. |
State v. Costa
2016 ND 65 Highlight: Counsel may not comment on facts not in evidence during closing argument, and a prosecutor may not vouch for evidence during closing argument. |
Cudmore v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2016 ND 64
Highlight: Before deciding whether to submit to chemical testing, an individual has a qualified statutory right to consult with an attorney. |
State v. Keller
2016 ND 63 Highlight: A district court does not abuse its discretion by refusing to give jury instructions that inadequately and inaccurately reflect the law. |
Curtiss v. State (cross-ref. w/20150007)
2016 ND 62
Highlight: The applicant in a post-conviction relief case has the burden of establishing grounds for relief. |
Degnan v. Degnan
2016 ND 61
Highlight: A district court does not abuse its discretion in granting spousal support and attorney's fee awards in amounts less than the requesting spouse's alleged need. |
Werven v. Werven
2016 ND 60
Highlight: Modification of spousal support is not warranted when the change in a party's financial circumstances is self-induced. |
State v. Putney
2016 ND 59
Highlight: A conviction rests upon insufficient evidence only when, after reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, no rational fact finder could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. |
City of Grand Forks v. Gale
2016 ND 58
Highlight: Delay attributable to an accused's purposeful evasion of prosecution may not result in a speedy trial violation, but the accused have no duty to bring themselves to trial. |
Martire' v. Martire' (cross ref 20110253, 20110197)
2016 ND 57
Highlight: Even when it is undisputed an obligor's net monthly income exceeds the income maximum under the Child Support Guidelines, the district court must determine the obligor's net income before it determines the appropriate upward deviation from the presumptive guideline amount. |
Woody v. Pembina County Annual Fair and Exhibition Association
2016 ND 56
Highlight: Owner of land inviting the public to use its property for recreational purposes without charge is protected from liability under N.D.C.C. ch. 53-08. |
State v. Quantz
2016 ND 55 Highlight: Convictions for disorderly conduct and indecent exposure are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1 (a)(3). |
Eagleman v. State
2016 ND 54
Highlight: Applicants for post-conviction relief are not entitled to relief when their claims have been rejected in prior proceedings. |
State v. Mann
2016 ND 53
Highlight: North Dakota's criminal refusal statute is constitutional under the Fourth Amendment and North Dakota Constitution article I, section 8. |
Matuska v. State
2016 ND 52 Highlight: Order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
State v. Odermann
2016 ND 51 Highlight: A criminal judgment for burglary and theft of property is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Interest of C.S. (Confidential)
2016 ND 50 Highlight: Order terminating parental rights summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Erickstad v. State
2016 ND 49 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (7). |
Vogt v. State
2016 ND 48 Highlight: A district court order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Aker v. Neiber
2016 ND 47 Highlight: Order denying motion to amend parenting time is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Rath v. Rath (cross ref. 20130025, 184 & 252; 20140012 & 291)
2016 ND 46
Highlight: A district court's decision on whether a contempt has been committed and remedial sanctions are warranted lies within its sound discretion and will not be overturned on appeal unless there is a clear abuse of discretion. |
Kittleson, et al. v. Grynberg Petroleum Company, et al.
2016 ND 44
Highlight: If a specific provision and a general provision in a contract conflict, the specific ordinarily prevails over the general. |
Nodak Mutual Ins. Co. v. Koller, et al.
2016 ND 43
Highlight: Whether an individual is a resident of a named insured's household for the purposes of an automobile insurance policy is a question of fact and technical notions of legal residence are not controlling. |
Williston Education Association v. Williston Public School Dist. No. 1
2016 ND 42
Highlight: Agreements between teacher associations and school boards must be read in light of the comprehensive statutory framework governing those relations. |
Annexation of a Part of Lewis & Clark Public School District
2016 ND 41
Highlight: A school district may be adversely affected by an annexation decision that causes the district to lose land or gain unwanted land. |
Brouillet v. Brouillet
2016 ND 40
Highlight: A district court's award of primary residential responsibility is a finding of fact, which will not be reversed on appeal unless it is clearly erroneous or it is not sufficiently specific to show the factual basis for the decision. |
State v. Reddig
2016 ND 39
Highlight: A defendant may not be convicted upon the testimony of an accomplice unless the testimony is corroborated by other evidence tending to connect the defendant with the commission of the crime. |
Sand v. Job Service, et al.
2016 ND 38
Highlight: N.D.R.Civ.P. 59 and 60 are not applicable to an administrative agency appeal to a district court. |
Desert Partners IV, L.P., et al. v. Benson, et al. (cross-reference w/20140066)
2016 ND 37
Highlight: An unrecorded instrument is valid between the parties to the instrument and those with notice. |
Dieterle v. Dieterle n/k/a Hansen (cross-reference w/20120329 & 20150030)
2016 ND 36
Highlight: An appellant may not collaterally attack an earlier unappealed decision. |
State v. Goodale
2016 ND 35
Highlight: When a default judgment is entered, the defendant may move for relief from the default judgment under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b). |
Haag v. Haag
2016 ND 34
Highlight: A material change of circumstances is an important new fact not known at the time of the prior order establishing residential responsibility. |
Erickson v. Olsen, et al. (cross-reference w/ 20130217)
2016 ND 33 Highlight: Under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(a), a court may correct a clerical mistake or mistake arising from oversight or omission when one is found in a judgment, but may not make substantive changes in a judgment. |
Estate of Vaage
2016 ND 32
Highlight: Evidence justifying reformation of a written instrument must be clear, specific, and convincing. |
State v. McClary
2016 ND 31
Highlight: A motion to correct an illegal sentence brought under the Rules of Criminal Procedure or brought under the Uniform Postconviction Procedure Act should be treated as equivalent to a motion under both provisions. |
Black Gold Oil Field Services, LLC v. City of Williston, et al.
2016 ND 30
Highlight: Granting or denying a preliminary injunction is based on: (1) substantial probability of succeeding on the merits; (2) irreparable injury; (3) harm to other interested parties; and (4) effect on the public interest. |
Interest of Johnson (cross-reference w/ 20120364 & 20140366)
2016 ND 29 Highlight: A district court must find a person has serious difficulty controlling his or her behavior to continue that person's commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. |
State v. Anderson
2016 ND 28
Highlight: The State cannot use a defendant's post-arrest silence as evidence of guilt, and the burden is on the State to prove that a comment on a defendant's post-arrest silence is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. |
State v. Stensaker (consolidated w/ 20150165)
2016 ND 27 Highlight: Murder conviction and two counts of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3); case remanded to fix clerical error in judgment. |
Interest of G.L.D. (CONFIDENTIAL)(cross-reference w/20100230,20120175,&2014
2016 ND 26 Highlight: Order denying request for discharge from commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Interest of G.L.D. (CONFIDENTIAL)(cross-reference w/20100230,20120175,&20140034)
2016 ND 25 Highlight: A district court order denying petition for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of N.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2016 ND 24 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Gomez v. State
2016 ND 23 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Benson v. State (cross-reference w/20130179)
2016 ND 22 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 7, SEJD (see 20160011)
2016 ND 21 Highlight: Judgeships retained at Jamestown and Valley City. |
PHI Financial Services, Inc. v. Johnston Law Office, P.C., et al.
2016 ND 20
Highlight: A party that acts as a "mere conduit" for a transfer of funds is not a "first transferee" for purposes of liability under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act. |
Titan Machinery, Inc. v. Patterson Enterprises, Inc., et al.
2016 ND 19
Highlight: A proponent may introduce into evidence a summary to prove the content of voluminous writings that cannot be conveniently examined in court. |