Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
601 - 700 of 12389 results
E.R.J. v. T.L.B. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 85 |
Nodak Ins. Co. v. Farm Family Casualty Ins. Co., et al.
2023 ND 84
Highlight: Interpretation of an insurance policy is a question of law, fully reviewable on appeal. |
Nodak Ins. Co. v. Farm Family Casualty Ins. Co., et al.
2023 ND 84 |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 3, NWJD
2023 ND 83 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Williston. |
State v. Smith
2023 ND 82
Highlight: When a party asserts prosecutorial misconduct for the first time on appeal, this Court may review for obvious error. |
State v. Smith
2023 ND 82 |
State v. Schaf
2023 ND 81
Highlight: The district court decides the qualifications of the witness to express an opinion on a given topic. The decision whether to admit expert witness testimony rests within the court’s discretion. |
State v. Schaf
2023 ND 81 |
State v. Hannesson
2023 ND 80
Highlight: Ordering a mistrial is an extreme remedy that is only appropriate when there is a fundamental defect or occurrence at trial that makes it evident that continuing would be productive of manifest injustice. |
State v. Hannesson
2023 ND 80 |
Hanson v. Hettervig, et al.
2023 ND 79 Highlight: An order of contempt and an amended order of contempt and award of attorney’s fees are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
Hanson v. Hettervig, et al.
2023 ND 79 |
Fietzek v. Fietzek
2023 ND 78
Highlight: A district court’s finding on a valuation of real property is not clearly erroneous if it is within the range of evidence presented. |
Fietzek v. Fietzek
2023 ND 78 |
State v. Frederick
2023 ND 77
Highlight: In the instance of an alleged public trial violation, an appellant must demonstrate the public was excluded from a proceeding taking place during trial, and that the proceeding was substantive in nature. |
State v. Frederick
2023 ND 77 |
Sandberg v. WSI, et al.
2023 ND 76 |
Sandberg v. WSI, et al.
2023 ND 76
Highlight: WSI can exercise continuing jurisdiction under N.D.C.C. § 65-05-04, but is limited by the law-of-the-case doctrine. |
Estate of Lindbo
2023 ND 75
Highlight: A personal representative is entitled to reasonable compensation for the personal representative’s services. |
Estate of Lindbo
2023 ND 75 |
Krueger v. Krueger
2023 ND 74 Highlight: A district court’s order on spousal support and contempt is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Interest of K.B. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 73 Highlight: An order requiring hospitalization is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of J.S. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 72 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) & (4). |
Jahner v. NDDHS
2023 ND 71 Highlight: This Court exercises limited review in appeals from administrative agency decisions. However, the application and interpretation of a statute is a question of law, which is fully reviewable in an administrative appeal. |
Jahner v. NDDHS
2023 ND 71 |
State v. Jacobs
2023 ND 70 Highlight: A criminal judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4). |
State v. Jacobs
2023 ND 70 |
Jones v. Rath
2023 ND 69 Highlight: A disorderly conduct restraining order must be supported by specific findings of intent to adversely affect the safety, security, or privacy of another person. |
Jones v. Rath
2023 ND 69 |
State v. Neugebauer
2023 ND 68
Highlight: A criminal sentence finalized before enactment of a statute cannot be reduced. |
State v. Neugebauer
2023 ND 68 |
Whetsel v. State
2023 ND 67 Highlight: An order summarily dismissing an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). |
Whetsel v. State
2023 ND 67 |
Martinez v. State
2023 ND 66 Highlight: A district court order denying an application for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Kluver, et al. v. SGJ Holdings, et al.
2023 ND 65
Highlight: A party moving for a new trial is limited on appeal to the issues raised in its new trial motion. |
Kluver, et al. v. SGJ Holdings, et al.
2023 ND 65 |
Wilkinson v. State
2023 ND 64 Highlight: An order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Wilkinson v. State
2023 ND 64 |
Secura Supreme Ins. Co., et al. v. Differding, et al.
2023 ND 63 Highlight: An insurance policy is a contract. An insurance contract relates to the parties executing it. Litigants cannot claim estoppel based on policies to which they are not a party; nor can they claim waiver of a provision in a policy they have no right to enforce. |
Secura Supreme Ins. Co., et al. v. Differding, et al.
2023 ND 63 |
State v. Grant
2023 ND 62
Highlight: A Batson challenge includes a three-step inquiry: (1) A defendant must make a prima facie showing that a peremptory challenge has been exercised on the basis of race; (2) If that showing has been made, the prosecution must offer a race-neutral basis for striking the juror in question; and, (3) In light of the parties’ submissions, the trial court must determine whether the defendant has shown purposeful discrimination. |
State v. Grant
2023 ND 62 |
State v. Tompkins
2023 ND 61 Highlight: Section 39-08-01(1), N.D.C.C., provides that refusal to submit to a chemical test and driving or being in actual physical control while under the influence of an intoxicating liquor are separate offenses. |
State v. Tompkins
2023 ND 61 |
Interest of D.H. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 60 Highlight: A district court’s order for continued treatment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Richardson v. State
2023 ND 59 Highlight: A district court order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Bauer v. Bauer
2023 ND 58 Highlight: An amended judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
State v. Linner
2023 ND 57
Highlight: The structural error doctrine applies to a narrow class of rights, including three Sixth Amendment rights defining the framework of a trial: the right to counsel, the right to self-represent, and the right to a public trial. Voir dire falls within the scope of public trials under the Sixth Amendment. |
State v. Linner
2023 ND 57 |
State v. K.J.A. (Confidential)
2023 ND 56 Highlight: Section 25-03.3-04, N.D.C.C., precludes a court from destroying records early under N.D.R.Juv.P. 19(e) when the alleged offense is an offense defined in N.D.C.C. § 12.1-20 or N.D.C.C. § 12.1-27.2. |
State v. K.J.A. (Confidential)
2023 ND 56 |
Senske Rentals, et al. v. City of Grand Forks
2023 ND 55
Highlight: The appellate court has discretion whether to grant a parties’ request for judicial notice on appeal. |
Senske Rentals, et al. v. City of Grand Forks
2023 ND 55 |
Pozorski, et al. v. Trucks, Trailers & More, et al.
2023 ND 54 Highlight: A district court judgment dismissing a party’s claims is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Pozorski, et al. v. Trucks, Trailers & More, et al.
2023 ND 54 |
Goetz v. Goetz, et al.
2023 ND 53 Highlight: A district court must make specific findings regarding whether a material change in circumstances resulted in a general decline or adversely affected the children in order to modify primary residential responsibility. |
Goetz v. Goetz, et al.
2023 ND 53 |
Matter of O.H.W. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 52 Highlight: A district court’s order denying an application for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Matter of O.H.W. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 52 |
Rath v. Rath, et al.
2023 ND 51 Highlight: Under N.D.R.Civ.P. 83(b), when a procedure is not specified, the district court may regulate its practice in any manner that is not inconsistent with a statute or rule. |
Rath v. Rath, et al.
2023 ND 51 |
Wrigley v. Romanick, et al.
2023 ND 50
Highlight: There is a fundamental right for a woman to obtain an abortion in instances where it is necessary to preserve her life or health. |
Wrigley v. Romanick, et al.
2023 ND 50 |
Interest of C.V.
2023 ND 49 Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) |
Brockmeyer v. Brockmeyer, et al.
2023 ND 48
Highlight: Issues not necessary to the determination of an appeal will not be addressed. |
Brockmeyer v. Brockmeyer, et al.
2023 ND 48 |
State v. Watts
2023 ND 47
Highlight: Evidence not stricken from the record, or for which the jury was not instructed to disregard, remains available for the jury’s consideration. |
State v. Watts
2023 ND 47 |
State v. Hanson
2023 ND 46
Highlight: Comments from the State focusing on inconsistencies in a defendant’s case do not amount to prosecutorial misconduct. |
State v. Hanson
2023 ND 46 |
Crichlow v. Andrews
2023 ND 45
Highlight: A district court must consider all of the parties’ assets and debts, including separate property, to ensure an equitable distribution of the marital estate. |
Crichlow v. Andrews
2023 ND 45 |
State v. Isaak
2023 ND 44
Highlight: An abatement ab initio of a criminal prosecution means a dismissal of all proceedings in the prosecution from its inception. |
State v. Isaak
2023 ND 44 |
4201 2nd Ave W v. First State Bank & Trust, et al.
2023 ND 43
Highlight: Secured creditors may recover on a debt by proceeding against all collateral in a single action or by proceeding against personal property after foreclosing a real property mortgage securing the same debt. |
4201 2nd Ave W v. First State Bank & Trust, et al.
2023 ND 43 |
Kainz, et al. v. Jacam Chemical Co. 2013
2023 ND 42
Highlight: An order that has the practical effect of terminating the litigation in the Plaintiff’s chosen forum and effectively forecloses litigation in the courts of this state may be appealable. |
Kainz, et al. v. Jacam Chemical Co. 2013
2023 ND 42 |
Henry Hill Oil Services v. Tufto, et al.
2023 ND 41
Highlight: A construction lien covers the land on which an improvement is located to the extent of the right, title, and interest of the owner for whose use or benefit the labor was done or materials furnished. |
Henry Hill Oil Services v. Tufto, et al.
2023 ND 41 |
Interest of Sternberg
2023 ND 40
Highlight: In civil commitment hearings, the State is burdened with demonstrating by clear and convincing evidence that an individual is a sexually dangerous individual. To do so, the State must establish three statutory elements. |
Interest of Sternberg
2023 ND 40 |
Interest of A.P. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 39
Highlight: The right to appeal is statutory. If no statutory basis exists for an appeal, the court lacks appellate jurisdiction and must dismiss the appeal. |
Interest of A.P. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 39 |
Olympic Financial Group, et al. v. ND Dep't of Financial Institutions
2023 ND 38
Highlight: Ordinarily, a dismissal without prejudice is not appealable because either side may commence another action. |
Olympic Financial Group, et al. v. ND Dep't of Financial Institutions
2023 ND 38 |
Miller, et al. v. Nodak Ins. Co.
2023 ND 37
Highlight: Interpretation of an insurance policy presents a question of law, reviewed de novo on appeal. |
Miller, et al. v. Nodak Ins. Co.
2023 ND 37 |
Arthaud v. Fuglie
2023 ND 36 Highlight: The Uniform Single Publication Act precludes the discovery rule from applying to statements made to the public. |
Arthaud v. Fuglie
2023 ND 36 |
Boutrous, et al. v. Transform Operating Stores, et al.
2023 ND 35
Highlight: A summary eviction action may be brought to recover the possession of real estate if a lessee violates a material term of the written lease agreement between the lessor and lessee. |
Boutrous, et al. v. Transform Operating Stores, et al.
2023 ND 35 |
State v. McLaughlin
2023 ND 34 Highlight: A criminal judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(8) and (4). |
State v. McLaughlin
2023 ND 34 |
Nevin, et al. v. Kennedy, et al.
2023 ND 33
Highlight: The primary purpose in interpreting a deed is to ascertain the grantor’s intent. |
Nevin, et al. v. Kennedy, et al.
2023 ND 33 |
Queen v. Martel, et al.
2023 ND 32 Highlight: An award of equal residential responsibility of a minor child is remanded to the district court to make specific findings of fact on whether the domestic violence rebuttable presumption under N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.2(1)(j) is triggered and, if so, whether the presumption is rebutted. |
Interest of V.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 31 Highlight: A district court judgment terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of V.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 31 |
Krogstad v. State
2023 ND 30 Highlight: An order dismissing an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |