Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3651 - 3700 of 12250 results
|
State, et al. v. Nelson (cross-reference w/20100413)
2012 ND 110 Highlight: Order denying motion to dismiss an administrative lien placed on prisoner spending accounts is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
|
Thorson v. State (cross-reference w/ 20020212)
2012 ND 109 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Gress v. State (cross-reference w/20110047)
2012 ND 108 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
|
State v. Unruh
2012 ND 107 Highlight: A district court order revoking probation and an amended criminal judgment are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
|
Hangsleben v. Halverson
2012 ND 106 Highlight: Summary judgment and award of costs and attorney's fees are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (6). |
|
Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Anderson, et al. (cons. w/20120024)
2012 ND 105
Highlight: A party seeking to enter property to conduct testing and surveying under N.D.C.C. 32-15-06 must establish it is in the category of persons entitled to seek eminent domain. |
|
Estate of Boehm
2012 ND 104
Highlight: When technical language is used, meaning words that have acquired a peculiar and appropriate meaning in law, or are defined by statute, such words must be construed according to such peculiar and appropriate meaning or definition. |
|
State v. Parizek
2012 ND 103 |
|
Bell v. N.D. Dept. of Transportation
2012 ND 102
Highlight: An individual who asks to consult with an attorney before deciding to take a chemical test must be given a reasonable opportunity to do so if it does not materially interfere with the administration of the test. |
|
Kooser v. State
2012 ND 101
Highlight: North Dakota courts may accept a guilty plea accompanied by an assertion of innocence as permitted by the United States Supreme Court's decision in North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970). |
|
Dorothy J. Pierce Family Mineral Trust v. Jorgenson, et al.
2012 ND 100 Highlight: Only judgments and decrees which constitute a final judgment of the rights of the parties to the action and orders enumerated by statute are appealable. |
|
Watts, et al. v. Magic 2 x 52 Management, Inc., et al.
2012 ND 99 Highlight: Post-judgment motion seeking to pierce corporate veil and to recover punitive damages based on prejudgment and post-judgment evidence must be brought under N.D.R.Civ.P. 59 or 60 when district court already considered and denied the requested relief in entering the judgment after trial. |
|
Palmer v. State (consol.w/20110346-20110348)(cross-ref.w/20010123-20010126)
2012 ND 98 Highlight: A decision cannot be properly reviewed on appeal if the district court does not provide an adequate explanation of its rationale for its decision. |
|
State v. Lee
2012 ND 97
Highlight: A person arrested for DUI has a limited statutory right to consult with an attorney before deciding whether to submit to a chemical test. |
|
Wilson v. State (consolidated w/20110363)
2012 ND 96 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (6). |
|
State v. Sandoval
2012 ND 95 Highlight: Amended criminal judgment after the district court revoked a defendant's probation and ordered him to serve a sentence longer than the original sentence the court imposed after he pled guilty to a felony and two misdemeanors is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
|
Matter of C.S. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2012 ND 94 Highlight: Order denying request for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Matter of Richardson
2012 ND 93 Highlight: Order civilly committing a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Disciplinary Board v. Tollefson (CONSOLIDATED W/ 20120131 & 20120132)
2012 ND 92 Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered. |
|
Come Big or Stay Home, LLC v. EOG Resources, Inc.
2012 ND 91
Highlight: An agreement may be supplemented by custom or usage, under appropriate circumstances |
|
Pifer v. McDermott
2012 ND 90
Highlight: A partial judgment that disposes of fewer than all claims against all parties will not be considered on appeal absent N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b) certification. |
|
Raymond J. German, Ltd. v. Brossart
2012 ND 89
Highlight: When a default judgment, rather than a district court's order regarding a N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to vacate the default judgment, is appealed, it is reviewed to determine whether irregularities appear on the face of the judgment. |
|
Lynch v. The New Public School District No. 8
2012 ND 88
Highlight: Although a teacher who does not receive a notice of nonrenewal is entitled to an offer of reemployment under the same terms and conditions as the current contract, the teacher does not have a right to an identical contract with identical duties and assignments as the current year. |
|
Johnson v. WSI, et al.
2012 ND 87
Highlight: To receive WSI benefits, a claimant must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, a compensable injury was suffered. |
|
Vining v. Renton
2012 ND 86
Highlight: When considering modification of primary residential responsibility, a district court must gauge the best interests of the child factors against the backdrop of the stability of the child's relationship with the custodial parent. |
|
Pelzl v. State (cross-reference 20100227)
2012 ND 85 Highlight: Judgment summarily dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
|
Tibor v. State
2012 ND 84 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (6). |
|
Harmon v. State (Cross-reference w/19960206 & 19970100)
2012 ND 83 Highlight: A district court order summarily dismissing a petition for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
|
Willard v. Allstate Ins. Co., et al.
2012 ND 82 Highlight: Summary judgment in a wrongful death action is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). |
|
Tibert et al. v. Nodak Mutual
2012 ND 81
Highlight: Public policy precludes an insured from being indemnified for losses caused by the insured's intentional or willful conduct. |
|
Hector v. City of Fargo
2012 ND 80
Highlight: A resolution of necessity for an improvement district must set forth the general nature of the improvement, the approximate amount the municipality will be obligated to pay, and the amount proposed to be paid by special assessments. |
|
M.M., et al. v. Fargo Public School Dist. #1, et al.(cross-reference w/ 20090121
2012 ND 79
Highlight: When statutes are silent on an issue, courts may consider authorities from outside the state to resolve the issue. |
|
Northern Excavating v. Sisters of Mary of the Presentation
2012 ND 78
Highlight: When no amount is stated in a construction contract, the amount of a filed construction lien must be reasonably accurate for the lienholder to avoid liability for the owner's costs and reasonable attorney's fees. |
|
Schock v. N.D. Dept. of Transportation
2012 ND 77
Highlight: Common sense and experience permit an administrative hearing officer to aid in drawing inferences from the evidence presented. |
|
State v. Alaniz
2012 ND 76
Highlight: The Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches applies to searches by school authorities, and the legality of the search depends on its reasonableness. |
|
State v. Morin
2012 ND 75
Highlight: A district court decision on a motion to suppress evidence will be affirmed if there is sufficient competent evidence to support the district court's findings and the decision is not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. |
|
Morris v. Moller
2012 ND 74
Highlight: Parenting investigators must strictly adhere to their Code of Conduct when rendering services. |
|
Fetzer v. Workforce Safety and Insurance
2012 ND 73
Highlight: Claimants for workers' compensation benefits must prove a causal connection between their employment and injury. |
|
Dakota Resource Council v. ND Public Service Commission, et al.
2012 ND 72 Highlight: Section 38-14.1-24(2), N.D.C.C., does not establish a hierarchy of postmining land uses. |
|
Holbach v. City of Minot (cross-ref. 20070042, 20070289, 20090038 & 20100144)
2012 ND 71 Highlight: Order denying post-conviction relief application summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
|
Adoption of K.R.H.N. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2012 ND 70 Highlight: Decree terminating parental rights and granting petition for adoption is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
State v. Mendez
2012 ND 69
Highlight: Criminal judgment for assault on a peace officer and contact by bodily fluids is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
|
Guardianship/Conservatorship of D.F.S.
2012 ND 68
Highlight: Judgment dismissing with prejudice a petition for appointment as a guardian and conservator because of improper service is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
|
State v. White
2012 ND 67 Highlight: Criminal judgment entered after a defendant pled guilty to criminal trespass, menacing, preventing arrest, and possession of drug paraphernalia is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
|
Yellow v. State (Consolidated w/20110310)
2012 ND 66 Highlight: Order denying a petitioner's application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (3). |
|
Rudolph v. N.D. Dept. of Transportation
2012 ND 65 Highlight: A district court judgment affirming a Department of Transportation decision revoking driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5). |
|
N.D. State Board of Higher Education v. Jaeger et al.
2012 ND 64 Highlight: Supreme Court has discretionary authority to exercise original jurisdiction and issue remedial writs as may be necessary to properly exercise its jurisdiction. |
|
Weeks v. Geiermann, et al.
2012 ND 63 Highlight: A "medical services provider" who does not make disclosures required under N.D.C.C. 13-01-15 to charge the "late payment charge" allowed under N.D.C.C. 13-01-14.1 is still entitled to prejudgment interest under N.D.C.C. 47-14-05 at the legal rate of six percent per annum. |
|
Estate of Harms
2012 ND 62
Highlight: A co-trustee of a testamentary did not waive the right to argue for an alternative distribution of estate assets by administering a trust. |
|
Judicial Vacancy in Judgeship No. 3, Southwest Judicial District
2012 ND 61 Highlight: Judgeship retained. |