The United States Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit has affirmed the district court ruling in a North Dakota case, Continental Resources, Inc. v. U.S., U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 23-2249.

Summary from Justia:

"Continental Resources, Inc., an oil and gas production company, leases minerals from both the North Dakota Board of University and School Lands (Land Board) and the United States. The dispute centers on the entitlement to royalties from minerals extracted from the bed of Lake Sakakawea in North Dakota, which depends on the location of the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM). If North Dakota law and the state survey govern the OHWM, the Land Board is entitled to a larger percentage of the royalties; if the federal survey controls, the United States is entitled to a larger percentage.

The United States removed the interpleader action to federal court and moved to dismiss based on sovereign immunity. The United States District Court for the District of North Dakota denied the motion, holding that under 28 U.S.C. § 2410(a)(5), the United States waived sovereign immunity because North Dakota law created a lien in favor of the United States upon Continental severing the minerals. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the United States for lands retained since North Dakota's admission to the Union, applying federal law and the Corps Survey. It granted summary judgment in favor of the Land Board for lands reacquired by the United States, applying North Dakota law and the Wenck survey.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reviewed the case. It affirmed the district court's denial of the motion to dismiss, agreeing that the United States had a lien on the disputed minerals under North Dakota law. The court also affirmed the summary judgment in favor of the Land Board, holding that North Dakota law governs the current location of the OHWM for lands reacquired by the United States. The court denied the United States' motion for judicial notice of additional documents." 

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca8/23-2249/23-2249-2025-05-02.html?utm_source=summary-newsletters&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2025-05-03-u-s-court-of-appeals-for-the-eighth-circuit-def6f5c0fb&utm_content=text-case-title-3

Read the 8th Circuit's opinion here: https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/25/05/232249P.pdf