Hysjulien v. Hill Top Home of Comfort, et al.
- Lindsey Hysjulien, Plaintiff and Appellant
Hill Top Home of Comfort, Inc.,
and Greg Armitage, Defendants and Appellees
- Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : EMPLOYER/EMPLOYEE DISPUTE
- Appeal From
Case No. 10-C-00051
Southwest Judicial District, Dunn County
Harlan Patrick Weir
The time for filing a claim for an unlawful employment practice under Title VII or the Human Rights Act depends on whether the claim raises discrete discriminatory or retaliatory acts or alleges a hostile work environment.
Discrete discriminatory acts are not actionable if time-barred, even when they are related to acts alleged in timely filed charges, and each discrete discriminatory act starts a new period for filing charges alleging that act.
A hostile work environment claim is composed of a series of separate acts that collectively constitute one unlawful employment practice. In deciding whether a hostile work environment exists, a court looks to all the circumstances, including the frequency of the discriminatory conduct; its severity; whether it is physically threatening or humiliating, or a mere offensive utterance; and whether it unreasonably interferes with an employee's work performance.
Intentional infliction of emotional distress requires proof of (1) extreme and outrageous conduct that is (2) intentional or reckless and causes (3) severe emotional distress.
A plaintiff claiming negligent infliction of emotional distress must also show bodily harm.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
|Seq. #||Filing Date||Description||Attachment|
|1||03/22/2012||NOTICE OF APPEAL : 03/21/2012|
|2||03/22/2012||ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION : Kapsner, Carol Ronning|
|3||04/25/2012||ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL (ENTRY NOS.1-47)|
|7||05/18/2012||NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT|
|8||05/21/2012||SITTING WITH THE COURT : Foughty, Donovan John|
|9||05/29/2012||Request for Radio/TV Coverage Associated Press approved|
|11||05/31/2012||DISK - AEB|
|12||05/31/2012||Received corrected Table of Authorities, page 27 & page 28 of AEB|
|15||06/13/2012||Received $25 e-filing surcharge for RYB (Receipt #21216)|
|16||06/14/2012||Received 7 copies of RYB from Central Duplicating|
|17||06/27/2012||APPEARANCES: Scott T. Solem; Daniel E. Phillips; Monte L. Rogneby|
|18||06/27/2012||ARGUED: Daniel E. Phillips; Monte L. Rogneby|
|19||06/27/2012||ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST|
|20||03/04/2013||DISPOSITION (AND REMANDED)|
|21||03/04/2013||UNANIMOUS OPINION : Crothers, Daniel John||View|
|22||03/04/2013||Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellant|
|23||03/04/2013||Judgment Sent to Parties|
|25||04/26/2013||Corrected/Substitute Opinion Pages|