Valentina Williston, LLC v. Gadeco, LLC
Docket Info
- Title
- Valentina Williston, LLC, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Gadeco, LLC, Defendant and Appellee - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : OIL, GAS AND MINERALS
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 2014-CV-00597
Northwest Judicial District, Williams County
David W. Nelson
Highlight
When an oil and gas lease does not provide how the parties may modify its terms, the parties may alter the lease by a contract in writing, or by an executed oral agreement, and not otherwise.
For the doctrine of promissory estoppel to apply, a party must establish a promise which the promisor should reasonably expect will cause the promisee to change his position, a substantial change of the promisee's position through action or forbearance, justifiable reliance on the promise, and injustice which can be avoided only by enforcing the promise.
The doctrine of promissory estoppel is inapplicable when there is no promise or agreement between the parties.
The promise must be clear, definite, and unambiguous as to essential terms before the doctrine of promissory estoppel may be invoked to enforce an agreement.
A promise is too indefinite for reasonable enforcement when a party retains the right to determine the extent of his performance.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 06/16/2015 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 06/16/2015 | |
2 | 06/17/2015 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 06/19/2015 | |
3 | 06/18/2015 | Received filing fee | |
4 | 06/18/2015 | ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION : Kapsner, Carol Ronning | |
5 | 06/18/2015 | NOT. OF FILING NOT. OF APPEAL AND PROOF OF SERV. | |
6 | 06/18/2015 | Notice Served on Charles L. Neff & Monte L. Rogneby | |
7 | 07/13/2015 | ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED JULY 13, 2015 (ENTRY NOS. 1-87) | |
8 | 08/17/2015 | ELECTRONIC TRANSCRIPT DATED OCTOBER 10, 2014 & C.O.S. | |
9 | 08/18/2015 | 1ST SUPPLEMENTAL ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED AUGUST 17, 2015 (ENTRY NOS. 88-89) | |
10 | 09/24/2015 | APPELLANT BRIEF (PDF) | View |
11 | 09/24/2015 | E-FILED BRIEF (PDF) | |
12 | 09/24/2015 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | |
13 | 09/24/2015 | E-FILED APPENDIX | |
14 | 09/28/2015 | Received $25 ATB e-filing surcharge & $19 ATA surcharge (Receipt # 23848 & 23847) | |
15 | 10/06/2015 | Received 7 copies of the ATB from Central Duplicating | |
16 | 10/06/2015 | Received 6 copies of the ATA from Central Duplicating | |
17 | 10/07/2015 | Received legible copies of pages 36 & 37 for the Appellant's Appendix | |
18 | 10/23/2015 | APPELLEE BRIEF (PDF) | View |
19 | 10/23/2015 | E-FILED BRIEF (PDF) | |
20 | 10/23/2015 | APPELLEE APPENDIX | |
21 | 10/23/2015 | E-FILED APPENDIX | |
22 | 11/02/2015 | Received $25 surcharge for AEB (Receipt #24067) | |
23 | 11/02/2015 | Received 7 copies of AEB from Central Duplicating | |
24 | 11/02/2015 | Received 6 copies of AEA from Central Duplicating | |
25 | 11/18/2015 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
26 | 11/20/2015 | SITTING WITH THE COURT : Maring, Mary Muehlen | |
27 | 12/07/2015 | 2nd ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED DECEMBER 7, 2015 (ENTRY NOS. 90-94) | |
28 | 12/07/2015 | APPEARANCES: Charles L. Neff; Monte L. Rogneby; Diane M. Wehrman | |
29 | 12/07/2015 | ARGUED: Charles L. Neff; Diane M. Wehrman | |
30 | 12/07/2015 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
31 | 04/21/2016 | DISPOSITION | |
32 | 04/21/2016 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : McEvers, Lisa K. Fair | View |
33 | 04/21/2016 | Costs on appeal taxed in favor of Appellee | |
34 | 04/21/2016 | Judgment Sent to Parties | |
35 | 05/16/2016 | MANDATE | |
36 | 07/19/2022 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |