Tschider v. Tschider, et al.
Docket Info
- Title
- Melanie J. Tschider, a/k/a Su Lin Tschider, Plaintiff, Appellee, and
Cross-Appellant
v.
Stacy L. Tschider, Defendant, Appellant, and
Cross-Appellee
and
State of North Dakota, Statutory Real Party in Interest
- Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : CHILD CUST & SUPPORT (Div.\Other)
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 2015-DM-00739
South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Sonna M. Anderson
Highlight
A premarital agreement may be unenforceable if it is unconscionable at the time of execution, at the time of separation or marital dissolution, or at the time of enforcement.
Whether a premarital agreement is unconscionable presents a question of law, but it turns on factual findings related to the relative property values, the parties’ financial circumstances, and their ongoing need.
A premarital agreement is a contract, and its interpretation is a question of law, which is reviewed de novo on the entire record on appeal.
A district court’s decisions regarding the division of marital property are treated as findings of fact and may be reversed on appeal if these findings are clearly erroneous.
The district court has broad discretion to award attorney fees in divorce proceedings.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 03/09/2018 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 03/09/2018 | |
2 | 03/09/2018 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 03/13/2018 | |
3 | 03/12/2018 | Received filing fee | |
4 | 03/12/2018 | NOT. OF FILING NOT. OF APPEAL AND PROOF OF SERV. | |
5 | 03/12/2018 | Notice served on Steven T. Ottmar, Robert J. Schultz & Steven G. Podoll | |
6 | 03/23/2018 | NOTICE OF CROSS APPEAL | |
7 | 03/26/2018 | NOT. OF FILING NOT. OF CROSS-APPEAL AND PROOF OF SERV. | |
8 | 03/26/2018 | Notice served on Steven T. Ottmar, Robert J. Schultz & Steven G. Podoll | |
9 | 04/09/2018 | ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED APRIL 6, 2018 (ENTRY NOS.1-662) | |
10 | 04/13/2018 | MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL | |
11 | 04/18/2018 | ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION : Crothers, Daniel John | |
12 | 04/18/2018 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (granted in part - arrears of spousal support) | |
13 | 04/23/2018 | AMENDED ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED APRIL 20, 2018 (ENTRY NOS.1-667) | |
14 | 04/23/2018 | 2ND AMENDED ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED APRIL 23, 2018 (ENTRY NOS.1-537 & 539-668) (NOT SENT 538) | |
15 | 04/24/2018 | 3RD AMENDED ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED APRIL 23, 2018 (ENTRY NOS.1-537, 539-570, 572-625 | |
16 | 04/24/2018 | 627-669) (NOT SENT 538) | |
17 | 04/25/2018 | Received via U.S. Mail Docket Entry 538 (2-CDs) | |
18 | 05/07/2018 | ELECTRONIC TRANSCRIPT DATED JUNE 30, 2017, w/KEY & C.O.S. | |
19 | 05/14/2018 | MOT. EXT/TIME TRANSCRIPT | |
20 | 05/14/2018 | E-FILED MOTION | |
21 | 05/15/2018 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE - Granted : 05/18/2018 | |
22 | 05/18/2018 | ELECTRONIC TRANSCRIPTS DATED NOVEMBER 10, 2016 w/ REDACTION KEY, | |
23 | 05/18/2018 | JUNE 28, 2017 W/ REDACTION KEY, & C.O.S. | |
24 | 05/21/2018 | ELECTRONIC TRANSCRIPT DATED JUNE 29, 2017, w/ REDACTION KEY | |
25 | 06/28/2018 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | |
26 | 06/28/2018 | E-FILED APPENDIX | |
27 | 06/29/2018 | APPELLANT BRIEF | View |
28 | 06/29/2018 | E-FILED BRIEF (PDF) | |
29 | 07/02/2018 | Rec'd e-filing surcharge for ATB & ATA (receipts #26282 & 26283) | |
30 | 07/09/2018 | Rec'd 6 copies of ATB & ATA from CSD | |
31 | 07/20/2018 | MOTION FOR additional words | |
32 | 07/20/2018 | E-FILED MOTION (combined with ext. of time request) | |
33 | 07/20/2018 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (up to 1,250 additional words for Appellee/Cross-Appellant's Brief) - Granted | |
34 | 07/20/2018 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF | |
35 | 07/20/2018 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE - Granted : 08/03/2018 | |
36 | 07/30/2018 | Received notice that no brief on behalf of the Appellee State of North Dakota will be filed | |
37 | 08/02/2018 | APPELLEE BRIEF | View |
38 | 08/02/2018 | E-FILED BRIEF (PDF) | |
39 | 08/03/2018 | MOT. EXT/TIME REPLY BRIEF | |
40 | 08/03/2018 | E-FILED MOTION | |
41 | 08/06/2018 | ACTION BY CLERK - Granted : 08/23/2018 | |
42 | 08/06/2018 | Rec'd $25 e-filing surcharge for AEB (receipt #26357) | |
43 | 08/09/2018 | Rec'd 6 copies of AEB from CSD | |
44 | 08/20/2018 | MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL WORDS - REPLY BRIEF | |
45 | 08/20/2018 | E-FILED MOTION | |
46 | 08/21/2018 | ACTION BY ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE TUFTE (ADDITIONAL 2000 WORDS) - Granted | |
47 | 08/23/2018 | REPLY BRIEF (WITHDRAWN REPLACEMENT FILED SEPTEMBER 14, 2018) | |
48 | 08/23/2018 | E-FILED BRIEF (PDF) | |
49 | 08/23/2018 | Recieved 6 copies of RYB back from Central Duplicating | |
50 | 09/05/2018 | MOTION/STIPULATION to Stay Proceedings to allow Appellant to w/draw and replace reply brief | |
51 | 09/06/2018 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE - Granted : 09/14/2018 | |
52 | 09/13/2018 | 1ST ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED SEPTEMBER 12, 2018 (ENTRY NOS. 672 - 685) | |
53 | 09/14/2018 | REPLY BRIEF | View |
54 | 09/14/2018 | E-FILED BRIEF (PDF) | |
55 | 09/24/2018 | Recieved 6 copies of RYB back from Central Duplicating | |
56 | 09/26/2018 | MOTION FOR additional words for Appellee/Cross-Appellant reply brief | |
57 | 09/26/2018 | E-FILED MOTION | |
58 | 09/26/2018 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (addt'l 1,000 words) - Granted | |
59 | 09/27/2018 | REPLY BRIEF OF CROSS-APPELLANT | View |
60 | 09/27/2018 | E-FILED BRIEF (PDF) | |
61 | 10/02/2018 | Rec'd 6 copies of RYB back from Central Duplicating | |
62 | 10/19/2018 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
63 | 10/24/2018 | SITTING WITH THE COURT : Narum, Daniel D. | |
64 | 11/20/2018 | APPEARANCES: Joanne H. Ottmar & Steven T. Ottmar; Douglas W. Murch | |
65 | 11/20/2018 | ARGUED: Steven T. Ottmar; Douglas W. Murch | |
66 | 11/20/2018 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
67 | 04/18/2019 | DISPOSITION (and Remanded) | |
68 | 04/18/2019 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : McEvers, Lisa K. Fair | View |
69 | 04/18/2019 | By Order of the Court, costs to neither party | |
70 | 04/18/2019 | Judgment Sent to Parties | |
71 | 05/10/2019 | MANDATE | |
72 | 05/30/2019 | Corrected Opinion Page 10 - deletes “a” from “appeal a unless” to correct to “appeal unless” | |
73 | 05/16/2019 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE |