WSI v. Boechler, PC, et al.
Docket Info
- Title
- State of North Dakota by and through
Workforce Safety and Insurance, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Boechler, PC and Jeanette Boechler, Individually, Defendants and Appellants - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : WORKERS COMPENSATION
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 2020-CV-2097
East Central Judicial District, Cass County
Tristan Jones Van de Streek
Highlight
A dismissal without prejudice is ordinarily not appealable because either side may commence another action.
When deciding a due process claim, we consider whether a constitutionally protected property or liberty interest is at stake and, if so, whether minimum procedural due process requirements were met.
WSI is required to notify an employer of the premiums and penalties that employer owes to WSI, and if the employer fails to pay that amount within thirty days, WSI may collect the premiums and penalties by civil action.
Under the North Dakota and U.S. Constitutions, excessive fines shall not be imposed. The federal excessive fines clause is violated if the fine is grossly disproportional to the gravity of a defendant’s offense.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 08/12/2021 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 08/12/2021 | |
2 | 08/16/2021 | Rec'd $125 filing fee | |
3 | 08/16/2021 | NOT. OF FILING NOT. OF APPEAL AND PROOF OF SERV. | |
4 | 08/16/2021 | Notice served on David C. Thompson & Jacqueline S. Anderson | |
5 | 09/13/2021 | ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2021 (ENTRY NOS.1-88) | |
6 | 09/21/2021 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF | |
7 | 09/22/2021 | ACTION BY CLERK - Granted : 10/19/2021 | |
8 | 10/19/2021 | SECOND MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF | |
9 | 10/21/2021 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE - Granted : 11/09/2021 | |
10 | 11/05/2021 | APPELLANT BRIEF | View |
11 | 11/05/2021 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | |
12 | 11/08/2021 | Rec'd non-substantive corrections to ATB (paragraph numbering & hard page breaks) | |
13 | 11/09/2021 | Rec'd 3 ATB & 2 ATA from CSD | |
14 | 11/12/2021 | Rec'd $31 ATA overage fee (receipt #28283) | |
15 | 12/06/2021 | APPELLEE BRIEF | View |
16 | 12/06/2021 | Oral Argument Request by Appellee | |
17 | 12/09/2021 | Rec'd AEB from CSD | |
18 | 12/18/2021 | MOT. EXT/TIME REPLY BRIEF | |
19 | 12/18/2021 | ACTION BY CLERK - Granted : 01/07/2022 | |
20 | 12/21/2021 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
21 | 12/22/2021 | Intent to Particpate in Oral Argument by Appellant | |
22 | 01/07/2022 | REPLY BRIEF | View |
23 | 01/10/2022 | Rec'd non-substantive correction to RYB | |
24 | 01/10/2022 | Rec'd non-substantive RYB C.O.S. | |
25 | 01/11/2022 | Rec'd 3 copies of RYB from CSD | |
26 | 01/24/2022 | APPEARANCES: David C. Thompson/Jacqueline S. Anderson | |
27 | 01/24/2022 | ARGUED: David C. Thompson/Jacqueline S. Anderson | |
28 | 01/24/2022 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
29 | 05/12/2022 | DISPOSITION | |
30 | 05/12/2022 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : Tufte, Jerod E. | View |
31 | 05/12/2022 | Judgment | View |
32 | 05/12/2022 | Costs taxed in favor of Appellee | |
33 | 06/03/2022 | MANDATE |