Search Tips

State v. Dahl

Docket No. 20210276
Oral Argument: Thursday, March 31, 2022 9:30 AM

Docket Info

Title
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Steven Ronald Dahl, Defendant and Appellant
Case Type
CRIMINAL APPEAL : DRUGS/CONTRABAND
Appeal From
Case No. 2019-CR-00260
Southeast Judicial District, Barnes County
Jay A. Schmitz
2022 ND 212982 N.W.2d 580
Oral Argument 3/31/2022

Highlight

When the sufficiency of evidence to support a criminal conviction is challenged, this Court merely reviews the record to determine if there is competent evidence allowing the jury to draw an inference reasonably tending to prove guilt and fairly warranting a conviction.

Constructive possession is proven when the evidence establishes that the accused had the power and capability to exercise dominion and control over the controlled substance or paraphernalia.

When a defendant fails to preserve a claim of insufficient evidence, the Court may review for obvious error, which is a narrow exception to the rule that issues may not be raised for the first time on appeal. Although the Court may decline review of forfeited errors when the appellant fails to argue the obvious error standard, the Court is not foreclosed from considering such errors. An error is obvious when it is a clear deviation from an applicable rule under current law.

Drug paraphernalia used, or possessed with intent to be used, to store a controlled substance does not satisfy the felony use element under N.D.C.C. § 19-03.4-03(1).

If even a properly instructed jury would have had insufficient evidence on which it could have convicted the defendant, the required remedy upon a conclusion there was insufficient evidence presented at trial is to enter a judgment of acquittal.


Briefs

Filing Date Description
01/11/2022 APPELLANT BRIEF View
02/09/2022 APPELLEE BRIEF View

Counsel

Party Type Name
APPELLANT COURT APPOINTED Scott Orel Diamond - 05773
APPELLEE STATE'S ATTORNEY Tonya Duffy - 07553

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. # Filing Date Description Attachment
1 10/05/2021 NOTICE OF APPEAL : 10/05/2021
2 10/05/2021 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 10/05/2021
3 10/05/2021 NOT. OF FILING NOT. OF APPEAL AND PROOF OF SERV.
4 10/05/2021 Notice Served on Scott O. Diamond and Tanya Duffy
5 10/05/2021 Notice of Court Appointed Counsel - Scott O. Diamond
6 11/02/2021 ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED NOVEMBER 1, 2021 (ENTRY NOS.1-17, 19-85, 91-99, 101-110)
7 11/02/2021 (Items Not Electronic - #18 - no doc)(86-90 bulky exhibits)(Del. Event #100 - Duplicate to #99)
8 12/06/2021 ELECTRONIC TRANSCRIPT DATED AUGUST 20, 2020 TO AUGUST 21, 2020 - TRIAL DAY 1
9 12/06/2021 ELECTRONIC TRANSCRIPT DATED AUGUST 20, 2020 TO AUGUST 21, 2020 - TRIAL DAY 2
10 12/06/2021 TRANSCRIPT CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
11 01/11/2022 APPELLANT BRIEF View
12 01/11/2022 APPELLANT APPENDIX
13 01/13/2022 Rec'd 3 copies of ATB and ATA back from CD
14 02/01/2022 ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED JANUARY 31, 2022 (ENTRY NOS. 111-114 )
15 02/09/2022 APPELLEE BRIEF View
16 02/09/2022 Rec'd non-substantive corrections to AEB
17 02/10/2022 Rec'd 3 copies of AEB back from CD
18 02/15/2022 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
19 02/16/2022 NOTICE OF RESCHEDULED ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
20 03/23/2022 2ND ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED MARCH 22, 2022(ENTRY NOS. 115-120)
21 03/30/2022 3RD ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED MARCH 29, 2022 (ENTRY NOS. 121-123)
22 03/31/2022 APPEARANCES: Scott O. Diamond/Tanya Duffy
23 03/31/2022 ARGUED: Scott O. Diamond/Tanya Duffy
24 03/31/2022 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
25 12/08/2022 DISPOSITION (AND REMANDED)
26 12/08/2022 UNANIMOUS OPINION : Tufte, Jerod E. View
27 12/08/2022 Judgment View
28 12/30/2022 MANDATE