Opinions

Berger, et al. v. Sellers, et al. 2023 ND 171
Docket No.: 20220322
Filing Date: 9/28/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A planned unit development is a form of zoning ordinance which is interpreted under rules of statutory construction. Where an incorporated reference is subsequently modified or repealed, that change does not alter the meaning of the law incorporating that reference.

A party is not required to exhaust administrative remedies prior to suit when the issue concerns the interpretation of an unambiguous statute and does not need the exercise of an agency’s expertise in making factual decisions.

The interpretation of a restrictive covenant is generally governed by rules for interpretation of a contract. Restrictive covenants will be given full effect when clearly established.

Whether a fiduciary relationship exists is generally a question of fact, dependent upon a showing of special circumstances.

Violating a requirement in the planned unit development or restrictive covenants constitutes an “unlawful” act for purposes of a statutory private nuisance claim. Homeowners do not have a right to sunlight and open space on adjacent properties.

Conduct that constitutes a breach of contract does not subject the actor to an action in tort for negligence, unless the conduct also constitutes a breach of an independent duty that did not arise from the contract. Section 9-10-01, N.D.C.C., codifies the general duty of care to abstain from injuring property or infringing upon rights. Neighbors who are members of a homeowners’ association owe each other an ordinary duty of care. A homeowners’ association owes homeowners reasonable care in approving construction plans. The fact finder determines how a reasonable homeowners’ association would act under the circumstances and whether the association exercised reasonable care in performing its duties. Generally, a contractor is relieved of liability if he followed the contractee’s plans or specifications which were defective or insufficient, and the defect or insufficiency caused the damage.

Slander is a false and unprivileged publication other than libel. Intentional interference with contract requires a breach of contract. Unlawful interference with business requires an independently tortious or otherwise unlawful act of interference. Negligence requires a breach of duty.

Berger, et al. v. Sellers, et al. 2023 ND 171
Docket No.: 20220322
Filing Date: 9/28/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Vacancy in Judgeship No. 1, SEJD 2023 ND 170
Docket No.: 20230256
Filing Date: 9/20/2023
Case Type: Judicial Administration - Rule - Rule
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Judgship retained at Jamestown.

Disciplinary Board v. Slyva 2023 ND 169
Docket No.: 20230232
Filing Date: 9/18/2023
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer reprimanded.

Suiter v. NDDOT 2023 ND 168
Docket No.: 20230109
Filing Date: 9/14/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: The district court judgment affirming an administrative suspension of a defendant’s driver’s license is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5) and (7).

Ruiz Ledezma v. State 2023 ND 167
Docket No.: 20230055
Filing Date: 9/14/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: The district court order denying a defendant’s petition for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

Bechtle v. Bechtle, et al. 2023 ND 166
Docket No.: 20230054
Filing Date: 9/14/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court order denying a motion to modify parenting time is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P 35.1(a)(2).

Buller v. Buller 2023 ND 165
Docket No.: 20230050
Filing Date: 9/14/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court’s order regarding primary residential responsibility and valuation and distribution of the martial estate is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Friends of the Rail Bridge, et al. v. N.D. Dep't of Water Resources, et al. 2023 ND 164
Docket No.: 20230255
Filing Date: 9/14/2023
Case Type: Original Proceeding - Civil - Writ of Mandamus
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: This Court exercises its supervisory jurisdiction when no adequate alternative remedy exists and not merely because the appeal may involve an increase of expense or an inconvenient delay.

Friends of the Rail Bridge, et al. v. N.D. Dep't of Water Resources, et al. 2023 ND 164
Docket No.: 20230255
Filing Date: 9/14/2023
Case Type: Original Proceeding - Civil - Writ of Mandamus
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Interest of A.Z. 2023 ND 163
Docket No.: 20230245
Filing Date: 9/14/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Interest of A.Z. 2023 ND 163
Docket No.: 20230245
Filing Date: 9/14/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Disciplinary Board v. Pilch 2023 ND 162
Docket No.: 20230152
Filing Date: 8/17/2023
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer suspended.

Disciplinary Board v. Pilch 2023 ND 161
Docket No.: 20230147
Filing Date: 8/17/2023
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer disbarred.

Disciplinary Board v. Overboe 2023 ND 160
Docket No.: 20230090
Filing Date: 8/17/2023
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer suspended.

Disciplinary Board v. Baird 2023 ND 159
Docket No.: 20230075
Filing Date: 8/17/2023
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer suspended.

Interest of A.M. (CONFIDENTIAL)(consolidated w/20230210) 2023 ND 158
Docket No.: 20230209
Filing Date: 8/17/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order terminating parental rights summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4), and (7).

Interest of A.B. (CONFIDENTIAL) (consolidated w/20230198 & 20230199) 2023 ND 157
Docket No.: 20230197
Filing Date: 8/17/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

Sayler v. Sayler 2023 ND 156
Docket No.: 20230004
Filing Date: 8/17/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: A motion to relocate is not necessary when residential responsibility has not previously been established. Therefore, consideration of the Stout-Hawkinson factors is not necessary when the district court originally determines parental responsibility of parents living in different states.

The purpose or motive for a unilateral move is one of the many factors courts should consider and weigh when determining parental responsibility.

State v. Petersen 2023 ND 155
Docket No.: 20230049
Filing Date: 8/17/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: Law enforcement exceeds its community caretaking function when it opens the door of a sleeping occupant’s parked semi-truck and steps onto the running boards in an attempt to gather information without first attempting to get a response from outside of the vehicle.

Under prong two of the inevitable discovery doctrine, the State must prove that the evidence would have been found without the unlawful activity and must show how the discovery of the evidence would have occurred.

Estate of Froemke 2023 ND 154
Docket No.: 20220321
Filing Date: 8/17/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Probate, Wills, Trusts
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A witness must demonstrate some basis for forming an intelligent judgment as to the value of land before offering lay opinion testimony about the value of the land.

A property owner may present opinion testimony about the value of his property even when the opinion relies upon information from another.

Out-of-court statements are non-hearsay if they are offered for their independent legal significance where the utterance of the words is, in itself, an operative fact which gives rise to legal consequences.

Estate of Froemke 2023 ND 154
Docket No.: 20220321
Filing Date: 8/17/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Probate, Wills, Trusts
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Davis, et al. v. Mercy Medical Center, et al. 2023 ND 153
Docket No.: 20220325
Filing Date: 8/17/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Malpractice
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: In a negligence action, a proximate cause is a cause which, as a natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by any controlling intervening cause, produces the injury, and without which it would not have occurred.

A court will not disturb a jury’s damages verdict unless the verdict is so excessive or inadequate as to be without evidentiary support.

The jury must determine the damages to which a party is entitled within reasonable limits, based upon the evidence. If those limits have been exceeded, it is the court’s duty to make a proper reduction or grant a new trial.

Davis, et al. v. Mercy Medical Center, et al. 2023 ND 153
Docket No.: 20220325
Filing Date: 8/17/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Malpractice
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

State v. Kollie 2023 ND 152
Docket No.: 20220343
Filing Date: 8/17/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Homicide
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A sidebar addressing routine evidentiary or administrative matters during trial, even without an adequate record, is not a closure implicating the public trial right.

The plain language of the statute criminalizing murder provides alternative means of committing the offense. A jury is not required to unanimously agree upon which of the alternative means of committing murder it believes the State proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

For purposes of double jeopardy, criminal offenses are different if each offense contains an element not contained in the other offense.

Irrelevant evidence is not admissible.

Rights of a deceased victim may be exercised by family members and others as provided in N.D. Const. art. I, § 25(4). Section 25 does not provide for the court’s enforcement of a crime victim’s rights on behalf of a deceased victim absent the assertion by an individual listed under § 25(4).

An erroneous evidentiary ruling is disregarded as harmless error under N.D.R.Crim.P. 52(a) if it does not affect the defendant’s substantial rights.

State v. Kollie 2023 ND 152
Docket No.: 20220343
Filing Date: 8/17/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Homicide
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Wootan v. State 2023 ND 151
Docket No.: 20230036
Filing Date: 8/17/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: Once the State moves for summary judgment on a post-conviction application, the defendant must provide evidentiary support for their application in response to the State’s motion.

Summary judgment on a post-conviction application is proper when the defendant fails to provide evidentiary support to show a genuine issue of material fact.

Black Elk v. State 2023 ND 150
Docket No.: 20230035
Filing Date: 8/17/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: A part must preserve an issue in district court before it can be reviewed on appeal. A party must preserve a claim of error, as it relates to the admissibility of evidence, by objecting or moving to strike the evidence on record and stating a specific ground for exclusion.

This Court will exercise discretion rarely to consider issues not preserved in post-conviction proceedings, and will do so only if the error is plain and seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.

A statement is not hearsay when it is offered simply to prove the statement was made. A petitioner at a post-conviction hearing is permitted to testify about the advice given to them by counsel as long as the testimony is submitted to simply show the advice was verbalized.

Advising a defendant that the defendant can deal with a material piece of evidence after a defendant has pled guilty and been sentenced by simply retracting or withdrawing the plea falls below an objectively reasonable standard of a defense attorney.

Goff v. NDDOT 2023 ND 149
Docket No.: 20230115
Filing Date: 8/2/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Substantially justified means justified to a degree that could satisfy a reasonable person.

Interest of D.M.H. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2023 ND 148
Docket No.: 20230028
Filing Date: 8/2/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Juvenile Law
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Absent a change in circumstances, the juvenile court does not err in adopting a prior visitation schedule as the current visitation schedule.

Hennessey v. Milnor School District 2023 ND 147
Docket No.: 20230056
Filing Date: 8/2/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Employer/Employee Dispute
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: In an appeal from a motion to dismiss under N.D.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), the complaint is construed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and well-pleaded allegations are accepted as true.

Undue influence is improper influence exercised in such a way and to such an extent as to destroy a person’s free agency or voluntary action by substituting for the person’s will the will of another.

In nontestamentary cases, undue influence requires three factors be established: (1) A person who can be influenced; (2) The fact of improper influence exerted; and (3) Submission to the overmastering effect of such unlawful conduct.

The law does not condemn all influence, only undue influence.

State, et al. v. Vetter 2023 ND 146
Docket No.: 20230031
Filing Date: 8/2/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: Rule 60(a), N.D.R.Civ.P., was designed to allow district courts to correct errors created by oversight or omission. Rule 60(a) does not authorize the court to change what has been deliberately done.

Gonzalez v. Perales 2023 ND 145
Docket No.: 20230026
Filing Date: 8/2/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: To be appealable under N.D.C.C. § 28-27-02(1), an order must determine the action and prevent a judgment from which an appeal might be taken.

An order is not appealable under § 28-27-02(5) unless, in effect, it finally determines some substantive legal right of appellant or is dispositive of a substantive issue.

Final order under section 14-14.1-34, N.D.C.C. [UCCJEA §314 (1997)], means an order that finally determines some substantive legal right of a party or is dispositive of a substantive issue.

State v. Larsen (consolidated w/20220375 & 20220376) 2023 ND 144
Docket No.: 20220374
Filing Date: 8/2/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: The August 1, 2021 amendment to N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-07(6) does not apply retroactively. Therefore, upon revocation of a conviction and sentence entered prior to August 1, 2021, a district court’s ability to resentence a defendant is limited to the previously imposed, but suspended, sentence.

State v. Larsen (consolidated w/20220375 & 20220376) 2023 ND 144
Docket No.: 20220374
Filing Date: 8/2/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

DOCR v. Louser, et al. 2023 ND 143
Docket No.: 20230117
Filing Date: 8/2/2023
Case Type: Original Proceeding - Criminal - Writ of Supervision
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation has broad authority under N.D.C.C. § 54-23.3-01 to supervise offenders and probationers when directed by the district court.

This Court exercises its supervisory jurisdiction rarely and cautiously, and only to rectify errors and prevent injustice in extraordinary cases when no adequate alternative remedy exists.

Zavanna v. Gadeco, et al. 2023 ND 142
Docket No.: 20220265
Filing Date: 8/2/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Oil, Gas and Minerals
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: The plaintiff bears the burden of proof on its quiet title claim. Where the plaintiff owns a top lease and the defendant owns a bottom lease covering the same oil and gas leasehold interest, the plaintiff bears the burden to prove the bottom lease terminated by its own terms. If the bottom lease contains a cessation of production clause, the plaintiff must prove production ceased for the specified period.

Oil and gas leases are interpreted in the same manner as other contracts. When left undefined, “production” in a savings clause means production in paying quantities, which generally requires a court to consider whether the well yielded a profit over operating costs over a reasonable period of time. As a matter of law, a de minimis amount of production does not equate to production in paying quantities. Where profitability of the well is not at issue so as to affect when production in paying quantities ceased, cessation commences on the first day of no production and ends on the last day of no production. If a total cessation of production exceeds the time period established in the lease’s cessation of production clause, the lease terminates unless it provides conditions preventing termination. In this case, a total cessation of production, including de minimis amounts, triggered the cessation of production clause requiring the well operator to timely commence reworking operations.

Reworking operations must be intimately connected with resolving the physical difficulty that caused the well to cease production, and the well operator must exercise due diligence and make a bona fide effort to restore production as soon as possible. Minimal preparatory steps, such as diagnosing the failure and ordering parts, do not constitute commencement of reworking operations.

An express force majeure clause in a contract must be accompanied by proof that the failure to perform was proximately caused by a contingency and that, in spite of skill, diligence, and good faith on the promisor’s part, performance remains impossible or unreasonably expensive. The party relying on a force majeure clause to excuse performance bears the burden of proving that the event was beyond its control and without its fault or negligence. The party relying on the force majeure clause must show its performance was actually hindered or prevented by the force majeure event, not just potentially or hypothetically hindered or prevented.

Zavanna v. Gadeco, et al. 2023 ND 142
Docket No.: 20220265
Filing Date: 8/2/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Oil, Gas and Minerals
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Edison v. Edison 2023 ND 141
Docket No.: 20220290
Filing Date: 8/2/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: North Dakota law forbids sex bias in custody determinations. Between the mother and father, whether married or unmarried, there is no presumption as to which parent will better promote the best interests and welfare of the child.

An obligor is underemployed if the obligor’s gross income from earnings is significantly less than this state’s statewide average earnings for persons with similar work history and occupational qualifications.

Edison v. Edison 2023 ND 141
Docket No.: 20220290
Filing Date: 8/2/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Legacie-Lowe v. Lowe 2023 ND 140
Docket No.: 20220314
Filing Date: 5/9/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: The district court’s findings are inadequate to understand the basis for the decision.

The Court retains jurisdiction and remands for the district court to make specific findings of fact on whether there was infliction of fear of imminent domestic violence.

Adoption of B.T.H. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2023 ND 139
Docket No.: 20230178
Filing Date: 7/19/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order and decree terminating parental rights to a minor child and granting a petition for adoption summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

Bullinger v. Sundog Interactive, et al. 2023 ND 138
Docket No.: 20230007
Filing Date: 7/19/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Corporations
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: A district court must make adequate findings under N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(a)(1) to understand the basis for its decision.

Interest of B.R. (CONFIDENTIAL) (consolidated w/20230187) 2023 ND 137
Docket No.: 20230186
Filing Date: 7/19/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Orders terminating parental rights are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

Redpaint v. State 2023 ND 136
Docket No.: 20230042
Filing Date: 7/19/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: Postconviction relief is governed by statute, and its proceedings are civil in nature and governed by the North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure.

An application for postconviction relief must be filed within two years after the conviction becomes final unless there is newly discovered evidence, delay due to physical disability or mental disease, or newly interpreted law retroactively applicable.

Interest of G.R.D. 2023 ND 135
Docket No.: 20230023
Filing Date: 7/19/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Juvenile Law
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A juvenile court’s order placing a child into the custody of the Division of Juvenile Services will not be reversed unless the court’s findings were clearly erroneous.

Otten v. Otten, et. al. 2023 ND 134
Docket No.: 20230019
Filing Date: 7/19/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: A district court judgment dividing marital property, weighing the best interest factors and awarding parenting time is affirmed.

A district court has broad discretion over the progress and conduct of a trial, and the determination whether to grant a continuance lies within the sound discretion of the district court.

Under N.D.R.App.P. 38, this Court may award attorney’s fees if the appeal is frivolous. An appeal is frivolous if it is flagrantly groundless, devoid of merit, or demonstrates persistence in the course of litigation which evidences bad faith.

Dogbe v. Dogbe, et al. 2023 ND 133
Docket No.: 20230037
Filing Date: 7/19/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: To modify a primary residential responsibility order within the two-year period following the entry of the order the movant must make a prima facie case showing the requirements under N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.6(5).

The district court can grant relief from an order if the party shows any of the reasons necessary for relief under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b).

Attorney's fees awarded by the district court will be reversed if the court abused its discretion.

Hagen v. N.D. Insurance Reserve Fund 2023 ND 132
Docket No.: 20230025
Filing Date: 7/19/2023
Case Type: Original Proceeding - Civil - Writ of Mandamus
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: A district court’s review of in-camera documents is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.

A district court’s conclusion that attorney work product meets the potential liability exception under N.D.C.C. § 44-04-19.1(8) must include a finding that the records relate to circumstances for which there remains a genuine potential for liability.

A public entity that has a legal duty to defend its member agencies may be able to demonstrate that attorney work product is exempt from disclosure if disclosure would reveal records that relate to circumstances for which there remains a genuine potential for liability.

A district court must follow the pronouncements of an appellate court on legal issues in subsequent proceedings of the case.

State v. Knight 2023 ND 130
Docket No.: 20230020
Filing Date: 7/19/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: A motion for new trial is reviewed for abuse of discretion.

Whether a jury verdict was coerced depends on the totality of the circumstances.

The district court does not abuse its discretion when it does not consider a juror declaration pertaining to the mental process of a juror during deliberations when deciding a motion for new trial.