On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
1081 - 1090 of 12418 results
Matter of Emelia Hirsch Trust
2022 ND 89
Docket No.: 20210324
Filing Date: 4/28/2022
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Probate, Wills, Trusts
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair
Eckroth v. Eckroth, et al.
2022 ND 88
Docket No.: 20220007
Filing Date: 4/28/2022
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Per Curiam
Highlight: An order denying a motion to modify primary residential responsibility and an order denying a motion for reconsideration are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7).
Eckroth v. Eckroth, et al.
2022 ND 88
Docket No.: 20220007
Filing Date: 4/28/2022
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Per Curiam
Trenton Indian Housing Authority v. Poitra, et al.
2022 ND 87
Docket No.: 20210302
Filing Date: 4/28/2022
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Landlord/Tenant
Author: Jensen, Jon J.
Highlight: This Court adopts the two-part review articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government, 522 U.S. 520 (1998) to determine whether land is a dependent Indian community and therefore Indian country.
The party challenging the state district court’s jurisdiction has the burden to prove the district court lacks jurisdiction.
A contractual provision, in itself, cannot establish subject matter jurisdiction with the tribal court.
Trenton Indian Housing Authority v. Poitra, et al.
2022 ND 87
Docket No.: 20210302
Filing Date: 4/28/2022
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Landlord/Tenant
Author: Jensen, Jon J.
Sauvageau, et al. v. Bailey, et al.
2022 ND 86
Docket No.: 20220080
Filing Date: 4/28/2022
Case Type: Original Proceeding - Civil - Writ of Supervision
Author: Crothers, Daniel John
Highlight: This Court exercises its supervisory authority rarely and cautiously, and only to rectify errors and prevent injustice in extraordinary cases when no adequate alternative remedy exists.
Quick take eminent domain offers a property owner less protection because the condemnor can take possession of the property before trial on the amount of just compensation due.
A water resource district may acquire an easement for a right of way for flood control projects by quick take eminent domain.
Sauvageau, et al. v. Bailey, et al.
2022 ND 86
Docket No.: 20220080
Filing Date: 4/28/2022
Case Type: Original Proceeding - Civil - Writ of Supervision
Author: Crothers, Daniel John
Energy Transfer, et al. v. ND Private Investigative and Security Bd., et al.
2022 ND 85
Docket No.: 20210244
Filing Date: 4/28/2022
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Administrative Proceeding
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.
Energy Transfer, et al. v. ND Private Investigative and Security Bd., et al.
2022 ND 85
Docket No.: 20210244
Filing Date: 4/28/2022
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Administrative Proceeding
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.
Highlight: A person has standing to appeal from an order denying intervention.
The mere fact that the parties have reached a settlement agreement is not itself sufficient to deny a motion to intervene relating to issues collateral to the settlement agreement.
An administrative agency has statutory authority to issue a protection order if the agency acts as an administrative hearing officer.
A document subject to open records laws may be withheld from disclosure if the document or parts of the document fall within a statutory exemption.
Energy Transfer, et al. v. ND Private Investigative and Security Bd., et al.
2022 ND 84
Docket No.: 20220036
Filing Date: 4/28/2022
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair
Highlight: An interlocutory order is only appealable when there is a statutory basis for the appeal and the district court has complied with the requirements of N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b).
The definition of “record” provided by N.D.C.C. § 44-04-17.1(16) does not require a public entity use information in a specific way for it to constitute a record.
Chapters 44-04 and 54-46, N.D.C.C., apply to information received by a public entity in connection with “official” or “public” business.
A party requesting additional discovery under N.D.R.Civ.P. 56(f) must “identify with specificity” the additional information it seeks and explain why that information would preclude summary judgment.
When a party has failed to perfect a cross appeal it may not seek a more favorable result on appeal than it received in the district court.
