Opinions

State v. Causer 2004 ND 75
Docket No.: 20030124
Filing Date: 4/13/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Neumann, William

Highlight: The State is required to provide prior written notice of the alleged probation violations to a probationer.
The trial court is not required to inform a probationer of his statutory right to appeal from a probation revocation. A probationer has no constitutional right to appeal and there is no notification requirement in North Dakota's statutes or rules of procedure.
A probationer does not have a constitutional right to counsel on appeal from a probation revocation because there is no constitutional right to appeal. A trial court has no duty to inform a probationer of his state-granted right to counsel, nor does a trial court have a duty to appoint counsel for a probationer, absent a probationer's request.
A probationer's right against double jeopardy is not violated by a trial court's imposition of additional probation as part of resentencing after probation is revoked.
North Dakota's statutory scheme provides a probationer with actual notice that a probation violation could result in the imposition of a sentence more severe than his originally imposed sentence.

Danzl, et al. v. Heidinger, et al. 2004 ND 74
Docket No.: 20030239
Filing Date: 4/13/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Absent statutory or contractual authority, each party to a lawsuit bears the party's own attorney fees.

Rydberg, et al. v. Rydberg 2004 ND 73
Docket No.: 20030212
Filing Date: 4/13/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: Issues on appeal are not restricted to those raised in a motion to alter or amend the judgment as long as the issues were raised at the district court.
A statute of limitations acts only to bar the bringing of the specified action and does not affect other remedies.
Paternity can be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence or by a court decree establishing paternity of the child by another man.
Genetic tests are enough to rebut the presumption of paternity by clear and convincing evidence.

Roth v. Hoffer 2004 ND 72
Docket No.: 20030282
Filing Date: 4/13/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Per Curiam

State v. Guscette 2004 ND 71
Docket No.: 20030177
Filing Date: 4/13/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A person is seized under the Fourth Amendment if, in view of all the surrounding circumstances, a reasonable person would believe he or she is not free to leave the area.
A seizure does not occur under the Fourth Amendment simply because a law enforcement officer asks a person questions, and as long as reasonable persons would feel free to disregard the officer and go about their business, the encounter is consensual and no reasonable suspicion of criminal activity is required.
Consent to a search is voluntary if, under the totality of the circumstances, it is the product of an essentially free choice and not the product of coercion.

State v. Lura (Consolidated w/20030186-20030194) 2004 ND 70
Docket No.: 20030185
Filing Date: 4/13/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author:

Highlight: Drug convictions summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7).

Weaver v. State 2004 ND 69
Docket No.: 20030325
Filing Date: 4/13/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Dismissal of second petition for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7).

State v. Provost (cross-ref. w/20030227 & 20030229-20030231) 2004 ND 68
Docket No.: 20030228
Filing Date: 4/13/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Conviction for simple assault on a peace officer is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).

State v. Stensaker 2004 ND 67
Docket No.: 20030204
Filing Date: 4/13/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Misdemeanor
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Conviction for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Heinz v. Heinz 2004 ND 66
Docket No.: 20030301
Filing Date: 4/13/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Amended divorce judgment summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Jundt v. Jurassic Resources, et al. (cross-ref. w/20010313) 2004 ND 65
Docket No.: 20030216
Filing Date: 3/26/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: What could have been presented in a prior appeal may not be heard on a later appeal.
A N.D.R.Civ.P. 68 settlement offer must present a clear baseline from which plaintiffs may evaluate the merits of their case relative to the value of the offer.
To trigger the mandatory cost-shifting provision, a defendant seeking costs under N.D.R.Civ.P. 68 must show that the offer was more favorable than the judgment.

Graves v. State Board of Law Examiners 2004 ND 64
Docket No.: 20030137
Filing Date: 3/26/2004
Case Type: Board of Law Examiners - Other - Other
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: The due process clause requires that the State Board of Law Examiners employ fair procedures, including a fair and impartial tribunal, when processing applications for admission to the bar.

St. Benedict's Health Center v. ND Dept. of Human Services 2004 ND 63
Docket No.: 20030289
Filing Date: 3/25/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Administrative Proceeding
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: Administrative regulations for setting Medicaid reimbursement rates involve complex and technical matters calling for agency expertise, and the Department of Human Services' expertise in interpreting its reimbursement regulations is entitled to deference.

Oldham v. Oldham 2004 ND 62
Docket No.: 20030072
Filing Date: 3/25/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A party waives an issue by not providing supporting argument.
Without supportive reasoning or citations to relevant authorities, an argument is without merit.

Gratech Company, Ltd., et al. v. ND Dept. of Transportation 2004 ND 61
Docket No.: 20030203
Filing Date: 3/23/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: All disputes arising out of any contract entered into by the Department of Transportation for the construction or repair of highways must be submitted to arbitration.
As a condition precedent to arbitration of a highway construction dispute, a contractor seeking additional compensation for work not covered in the contract must file a written notice of claim.

Nodak Mutual Ins. Co., et al. v. Ward Co. Farm Bureau, et al. 2004 ND 60
Docket No.: 20030134
Filing Date: 3/23/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Insurance
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A defendant must have standing to assert a counterclaim against a plaintiff.
The existence of standing is a question of law which is reviewed de novo.
Individual shareholders generally have no right to bring actions in their individual names and on their own behalf for a wrong committed against the corporation.
To have standing to sue individually, a shareholder must allege an injury separate and distinct from other shareholders.
The statutory right to shareholder access to corporate documents and records provides a right of inspection, not a right to receive answers to questions submitted by shareholders.

Johnson v. ND Dept. of Transportation 2004 ND 59
Docket No.: 20030339
Filing Date: 3/23/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The twenty-minute waiting period required before the administration of an Intoxilyzer test can begin before arrest.
The waiting period from the S-D2 test can be used when ascertaining the twenty-minute waiting period for the Intoxilyzer test.
Observing someone is not the only way to ascertain that person has had nothing to eat, drink, or smoke during the twenty minutes preceding an Intoxilyzer test.
A fact-finder can draw reasonable inferences from the evidence.

Giese v. Giese (cross-ref. w/20020168) 2004 ND 58
Docket No.: 20030278
Filing Date: 3/23/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce - Property
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: Civil contempt requires a willful and inexcusable intent to violate a court order. The trial court's finding of contempt will not be overturned unless there is a clear abuse of discretion.
A trial court may award attorney fees as part of the compensation to a complainant in contempt proceedings.

Interest of D.V.A. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2004 ND 57
Docket No.: 20030304
Filing Date: 3/23/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Civil Commitment of Sexually Dangerous Individual
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Experts in proceedings to commit sexually dangerous individuals may rely upon information reasonably relied upon by other experts in the particular field when forming opinions regarding whether an individual is sexually dangerous.
Information relied upon by experts in commitment proceedings under N.D.C.C. ch. 25-03.3 need not be admissible in evidence.
N.D.C.C. ch. 25-03.3 does not require the State to establish a respondent is not mentally retarded.

Ensign v. Bank of Baker 2004 ND 56
Docket No.: 20030234
Filing Date: 3/23/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The filing of a Uniform Commercial Code financing statement by a nonresident defendant and its two inspections of collateral in the forum state do not constitute a voluntary or purposeful effort to do business in the forum state for purposes of establishing personal jurisdiction over the nonresident defendant.

Groleau v. Bjornson Oil Co., et al. 2004 ND 55
Docket No.: 20030171
Filing Date: 3/23/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Under premises liability law, a defendant must have had control over the property where the injury occurred in order to find the defendant owed a duty to entrants upon the property.
Although a landowner generally owes a duty to lawful entrants to maintain property in a reasonably safe condition, the landowner's duty is limited when a dangerous condition is known or obvious to the entrant.
A landowner is not liable to entrants for injury caused by a known or obvious danger unless the landowner should anticipate the harm despite such knowledge or obviousness.
The determination whether a dangerous condition is open and obvious is generally a question of fact for the trier of fact.

Dettler v. Sprynczynatyk, Director, DOT 2004 ND 54
Docket No.: 20030292
Filing Date: 3/23/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: In an administrative agency appeal, the specifications of error must identify what matters are truly at issue with sufficient specificity to fairly apprise the agency, other parties, and the court of the particular errors claimed.
The purpose of the specificity requirement is to prevent meaningless specifications of error.
Boilerplate specifications of error are insufficient as a matter of law.
A fact-finder can draw reasonable inferences from the evidence.

State v. Schiele 2004 ND 53
Docket No.: 20030294
Filing Date: 3/23/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Conviction for luring a minor by computer is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Interest of K.P. (CONFIDENTIAL) (cross-ref. w/20030175) 2004 ND 52
Docket No.: 20040049
Filing Date: 3/10/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Mental Health
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The party moving for a change of venue must establish that the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change.
To modify an alternative treatment order and require hospitalization, the district court must find noncompliance with the terms of the order or find the order is insufficient to prevent the individual under the order from inflicting harm or injuries upon the individual or others.
Any amount of noncompliance with an alternative treatment order is cause for modification.

State v. Wilson 2004 ND 51
Docket No.: 20030112
Filing Date: 3/1/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Theft
Author: Neumann, William

Highlight: A defendant challenging the sufficiency of the evidence must show that the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, supports no reasonable inference of guilt.
Failure to give defendant's requested instruction is not error when the requested instruction misstates the law and when the instruction might unnecessarily confuse the jury.

State v. Pettit 2004 ND 50
Docket No.: 20030244
Filing Date: 3/1/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Criminal conviction for accomplice to manufacturing methamphetamine is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).

Beaudoin v. South Texas Blood & Tissue Center 2004 ND 49
Docket No.: 20030148
Filing Date: 3/1/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Removing, preserving, and delivery of body parts involves science or art requiring special skills not ordinarily possessed by lay persons and is governed by the two-year statute of limitations for malpractice.
A process server's service of process upon a corporation's Executive Office Manager will be deemed valid if a corporate employee identifies the Executive Office Manager as a proper person to accept service, the process server reasonably relies on that identifying representation, the Executive Office Manager served is of sufficient character and rank to make it reasonably certain that the defendant will be apprised of the service made, and the service results in actual delivery to a person responsible for protecting the corporation's interests in litigation.

State v. Bergstrom 2004 ND 48
Docket No.: 20030160
Filing Date: 2/27/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A search warrant is valid if it is supported by probable cause and it particularly describes the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.
A four-factor balancing is used to evaluate the validity of a speedy trial claim: length of the delay, reason for the delay, proper assertion of the right, and actual prejudice to the accused.

Vandall v. Trinity Hospitals, et al. 2004 ND 47
Docket No.: 20030255
Filing Date: 2/27/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: There is no common law tort for retaliatory discharge in North Dakota because of the statute.
A 180-day statute of limitations governs a claim for retaliatory discharge.
An individual who merely provides facts concerning the conduct of another to an administrative board possessing the authority to issue charges is not liable for wrongful use of civil proceedings before an administrative board.
In a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, the conduct must be so extreme in degree as to be beyond all possible bounds of decency and utterly intolerable in a civilized society.
A trial court may award attorneys' fees to a prevailing party in an action for retaliatory discharge brought under the statute.

Muhammed v. Welch 2004 ND 46
Docket No.: 20030182
Filing Date: 2/25/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Service on a decedent's widower is not service on the decedent's estate.
The fraudulent concealment necessary to extend a statute of limitations an additional year under section 28-01-24, N.D.C.C., relates to concealment of the cause of action, not concealment of the death of a party.
Equitable estoppel may preclude application of a statute of limitations as a defense by one whose actions mislead another, inducing that person to not file a claim within the statutory period.
An insurance adjuster acting for an insurance company may be considered the agent of the insured so as to estop the defendant-insured from raising the statute of limitations defense.
Representatives of a deceased defendant may have an affirmative duty to inform the plaintiff of the defendant's death.

Harfield, et al. v. Tate (Cross-ref. w/19980345) 2004 ND 45
Docket No.: 20030039
Filing Date: 2/25/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The commission of an act cannot be proved by showing the commission of similar acts by the same person at other times, or by showing the act was in conformity with the person's character or a character trait.

State v. Lemons 2004 ND 44
Docket No.: 20030029
Filing Date: 2/25/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Assault
Author: Neumann, William

Highlight: A trial court's refusal to allow a defense witness to testify by telephone is not an abuse of discretion because the Rules of Criminal Procedure provide that all testimony is to be taken orally in open court.
Denial of a motion for continuance to procure an absent witness is not obvious error when a defendant fails to demonstrate the denial affected a substantial right.
Without a showing of prejudice, a trial court's denial of a motion for new trial is not an abuse of discretion.

State v. Ochoa (Consolidated w/20030133) 2004 ND 43
Docket No.: 20030132
Filing Date: 2/25/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Neumann, William

Highlight: Without an unequivocal waiver of the constitutional right to counsel or an unequivocal assertion of the constitutional right to self-representation, a trial court is not required to permit self-representation or inquire into the issue of self-representation.
Hybrid representation is not a constitutional right. A defendant's request to proceed in such a manner is not an unequivocal assertion of a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to self-representation.

Wutzke v. Hoberg, et al. 2004 ND 42
Docket No.: 20030300
Filing Date: 2/25/2004
Case Type: Original Proceeding - Civil - Writ of Mandamus
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A party seeking a writ of mandamus bears the burden of demonstrating a clear legal right to the performance of the particular acts to be compelled by the writ and must demonstrate there is no other plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law.

Seibel v. Seibel 2004 ND 41
Docket No.: 20030095
Filing Date: 2/25/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Dixon v. McKenzie Co. Grazing Association 2004 ND 40
Docket No.: 20030005
Filing Date: 2/25/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The governing body of a cooperative grazing association is subject to the general law governing directors of cooperatives.
The good-faith acts of cooperative directors within the cooperative's power and in the exercise of honest business judgment are valid.
A court generally will not interfere with or regulate the conduct of a cooperative's directors in the reasonable and honest exercise of their judgment and duties when their judgment is uninfluenced by personal consideration.

St. Claire, et al. v. St. Claire 2004 ND 39
Docket No.: 20030233
Filing Date: 2/25/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Although prisoners have diminished constitutional protections, they maintain a due process right to reasonable access to the courts.
Procedural due process requires fundamental fairness, which, at a minimum, necessitates notice and a meaningful opportunity for a hearing appropriate to the nature of the case.
A person's due process right to appear may be satisfied by allowing appearance via telephone.

Interest of D.L.M. 2004 ND 38
Docket No.: 20030240
Filing Date: 2/25/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: The child support guidelines require the imputation of income when an obligor is unemployed.
A court errs as a matter of law when it fails to comply with the requirements of the child support guidelines in determining a child support obligation.
If the trial court finds the presumptively correct child support amount has been rebutted, it must make a specific finding.

Nesvig v. Nesvig 2004 ND 37
Docket No.: 20030041
Filing Date: 2/25/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: The actual nature of the subject matter of an action determines whether an action is a legal malpractice case.
Good faith is not a defense to a legal malpractice action.
A fiduciary relationship exists when one is under a duty to give advice for the benefit of another upon matters within the scope of the relationship.
An attorney may undertake to manage or invest a client's property, and in doing so, the attorney not only must conform to the applicable standard of care and comply with the fiduciary obligations, but also may assume the responsibilities of a trustee.

State v. Utvick 2004 ND 36
Docket No.: 20030103
Filing Date: 2/25/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Neumann, William

Highlight: Probable cause is not established for a no-knock search warrant when the magistrate is not presented with any information regarding the suspect's ability to destroy the evidence or the ease with which evidence may be destroyed.
State courts apply the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule in a manner consistent with United States Supreme Court precedent when evaluating whether evidence should be excluded due to a violation of the Fourth Amendment.
The good-faith exception to the federal exclusionary rule must be considered when a no-knock warrant has been issued in error.
A no-knock search warrant is not issued on a per se basis when the officer presents information sufficiently particularized to rebut any legal conclusion that the warrant was issued on a per se basis, even though the information was not sufficiently particularized to provide probable cause for a no-knock provision.

Swancy v. Tjon, et al. 2004 ND 35
Docket No.: 20030263
Filing Date: 2/25/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Judgment dismissing tort claims after a bench trial is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

United Community Bank v. Delorme, et al. (Consolidated w/20030262) 2004 ND 34
Docket No.: 20030251
Filing Date: 2/25/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Foreclosure
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Judgment granting foreclosure and order approving sheriff's sale are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1).

Swensrud v. Gates 2004 ND 33
Docket No.: 20030232
Filing Date: 2/25/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Distribution of property is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Judicial Vacancy in District Judgeship No. 4, Northwest Judicial District 2004 ND 32
Docket No.: 20040017
Filing Date: 2/18/2004
Case Type: Judicial Administration - Rule - Rule
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Judgeship retained at Minot.

Morton Co. S.S.B., et al. v. Schumacher 2004 ND 31
Docket No.: 20030226
Filing Date: 2/2/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: Use of a dangerous weapon without domestic violence is not enough to create a rebuttable presumption against awarding custody under N.D.C.C. 14-09-06.2(1)(j).
Under some circumstances, destroying property with a dangerous weapon could be domestic violence.
If a presumption against custody arises under N.D.C.C. 14-09-6.2(1)(j), the presumption must be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence.
Clear and convincing evidence to rebut a presumption against custody may require the accused to demonstrate why custody with the accuser is not in the child's best interests.
Clear and convincing evidence exists to rebut the presumption when none of the "best interests of the child" factors favor the other party.

State v. Bollingberg (Consolidated w/20020349 & 20020350) 2004 ND 30
Docket No.: 20020348
Filing Date: 1/28/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A court may look to other parts of a search warrant to determine whether the command portion suffers from a clerical error.
When there is no indication of any logical reason why a requested search was prohibited in a search warrant, this may be evidence of a clerical error.

First Union National Bank v. RPB 2, LLC, et al. 2004 ND 29
Docket No.: 20030021
Filing Date: 1/28/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Consideration is not required for the release or waiver of a mechanic's lien to be effective.
Once a lien claimant files a signed waiver or release of a mechanic's lien, the lien may not be revived by the subsequent filing of another lien.
Fraud in procuring release of a mechanic's lien must be proved by clear and convincing evidence.

Peters-Riemers v. Riemers 2004 ND 28
Docket No.: 20030081
Filing Date: 1/28/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A pro se defendant in a contempt proceeding must be informed of the right to court-appointed counsel when a remedial contempt sanction includes the likelihood of incarceration.

Baier v. Job Service ND, et al. 2004 ND 27
Docket No.: 20030287
Filing Date: 1/28/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Unemployment/Job Service
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A person is disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits if discharged for misconduct in connection with employment.
An employee who deliberately violates or disregards standards of behavior that the employer rightfully expects is guilty of disqualifying misconduct.

Pierce, et al. v. B.P.O. of Elks 2004 ND 26
Docket No.: 20030017
Filing Date: 1/28/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: Whether a lessee has surrendered a lease by operation of law or made a good-faith attempt to mitigate damages for the lessor's breach of the lease is a question of fact not subject to disposition by summary judgment.