Opinions

State v. Erban
Docket No.: 19870281
Filing Date: 9/20/1988
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Meschke, Herbert

State v. Williams
Docket No.: 20240203
Filing Date: 3/20/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

McKenzie Electric Coop., Inc. v. El-Dweek, et al.
Docket No.: 20240275
Filing Date: 1/24/2025
Case Type: Original Proceeding - Civil - Writ of Supervision
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

State v. Nowik 2000 ND App1
Docket No.: 20000149
Filing Date: 12/27/2000
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: The appellant's conviction for driving a vehicle with a suspended license is summarily affirmed by the Court of Appeals.
No person has a constitutional right to operate a motor vehicle on the roads of this state without a valid driver's license.

Lang v. State, et al. 2001 ND App2
Docket No.: 20000223
Filing Date: 1/17/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Res judicata, or claim preclusion, prohibits relitigation of claims or issues that were raised or could have been raised in a prior action between the same parties or their privies, and which were resolved by final judgment in a court of competent jurisdiction.
Collateral estoppel, or issue preclusion, generally prohibits relitigation in a second action based on a different claim, of issues of fact or law which were, or must have been, determined in the prior suit.
Without citations to relevant authority or supportive reasoning, an argument is without merit.

Riemers v. State of North Dakota, et al. 2007 ND App1
Docket No.: 20060310
Filing Date: 4/27/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Constitutional Law
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Summary judgment is appropriate if the information available to the trial court does not establish a genuine issue of material fact, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
An appeal is frivolous if it is flagrantly groundless, devoid of merit, or demonstrates persistence in the course of litigation which could be seen as evidence of bad faith.

Riemers, et al. v. State, et al. 2007 ND App2
Docket No.: 20060382
Filing Date: 4/27/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A judge may not be held liable for any judicial act.
Collateral estoppel generally prohibits the relitigation, in a second action, of particular issues of either fact or law which were, or by logical and necessary implication must have been, litigated and determined in the prior suit.

Riemers v. State 2007 ND App3
Docket No.: 20070038
Filing Date: 8/15/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Factual assertions in a brief do not raise an issue of material fact satisfying Rule 56(e) for purposes of resisting a motion for summary judgment.
A party asserting a constitutional claim must do more than submit bare assertions and must bring up the heavy artillery or forego the claim.

Riemers v. State 2007 ND App4
Docket No.: 20070063
Filing Date: 8/22/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A judgment of dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted will be affirmed by an appellate court if it cannot discern a potential for proof to support the claim.
Under N.D.R.Civ.P. 12(c), if, on a motion for judgment on the pleadings, matters outside the pleadings are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion must be treated as one for summary judgment under N.D.R.Civ.P. 56.
The court, in deciding a motion for judgment on the pleadings, may consider, in addition to the pleadings, materials embraced by the pleadings and materials that are part of the public record without converting the motion to a summary judgment.

Lang v. Binstock 2001 ND App1
Docket No.: 19990345
Filing Date: 1/17/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: Per Curiam