Opinions
1 - 10 of 13103 results
Kirkpatrick v. NDDOT
2023 ND 190
Highlight: The North Dakota Department of Transportation has authority to conduct proceedings to suspend an operator’s license if law enforcement has provided it with information essential to showing suspension may be warranted under the law. |
Matter of Reciprocal Discipline of Roach
2023 ND 189 Highlight: Lawyer reprimaned and placed on probation. |
Disciplinary Board v. Baird
2023 ND 188 Highlight: Lawyer disbarred. |
Disciplinary Board v. Pilch
2023 ND 187 Highlight: Lawyer disbarred. |
Disciplinary Board v. Pilch
2023 ND 186 Highlight: Lawyer disbarred. |
Bd. of Trustees of The N.D. Public Employees' Retirement System v. N.D.
2023 ND 185
Highlight: The supreme court invokes its original jurisdiction only in cases publici juris and those affecting the sovereignty of the state, its franchises and prerogatives, or the liberties of its people. The supreme court has exercised original jurisdiction in cases where the separation of coequal branches of government and their respective authority have been challenged. |
Interest of P.R.-K.
2023 ND 184 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Jones v. Rath
2023 ND 183
Highlight: Only an aggrieved party may appeal from an order or judgment. |
Interest of K.J.
2023 ND 182 Highlight: A district court judgment terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
Isac v. State
2023 ND 181
Highlight: When a post-conviction relief applicant seeks to withdraw a guilty plea based upon ineffective assistance of counsel, the applicant must satisfy a two-prong test by showing (1) his counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s errors, the applicant would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial. Under the second prong, the district court is required to determine what the applicant would have done had he received competent advice—not what he would have done with the benefit of hindsight. |