On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
12221 - 12230 of 12259 results
Pickard v. Job Service ND, et al.
Docket No.: 19870236
Filing Date: 4/18/1988
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Unemployment/Job Service
Author: Gierke III, H.
Commercial Bank of Mott v. Stewart
Docket No.: 19870238
Filing Date: 9/20/1988
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Gierke III, H.
State v. Brown
Docket No.: 19870242
Filing Date: 3/4/1988
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald
Bye v. Federal Land Bank Association of Grand Forks et al
Docket No.: 19870243
Filing Date: 4/18/1988
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Gierke III, H.
State v. Williams
Docket No.: 20240203
Filing Date: 3/20/2025
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Crothers, Daniel John
Lang v. Binstock
2001 ND App1
Docket No.: 19990345
Filing Date: 1/17/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: Per Curiam
Riemers v. State
2007 ND App3
Docket No.: 20070038
Filing Date: 8/15/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: Per Curiam
Highlight: Factual assertions in a brief do not raise an issue of material fact satisfying Rule 56(e) for purposes of resisting a motion for summary judgment. A party asserting a constitutional claim must do more than submit bare assertions and must bring up the heavy artillery or forego the claim.
Riemers v. State
2007 ND App4
Docket No.: 20070063
Filing Date: 8/22/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: Per Curiam
Highlight: A judgment of dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted will be affirmed by an appellate court if it cannot discern a potential for proof to support the claim. Under N.D.R.Civ.P. 12(c), if, on a motion for judgment on the pleadings, matters outside the pleadings are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion must be treated as one for summary judgment under N.D.R.Civ.P. 56. The court, in deciding a motion for judgment on the pleadings, may consider, in addition to the pleadings, materials embraced by the pleadings and materials that are part of the public record without converting the motion to a summary judgment.
State v. Nowik
2000 ND App1
Docket No.: 20000149
Filing Date: 12/27/2000
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Per Curiam
Highlight: The appellant's conviction for driving a vehicle with a suspended license is summarily affirmed by the Court of Appeals. No person has a constitutional right to operate a motor vehicle on the roads of this state without a valid driver's license.
Lang v. State, et al.
2001 ND App2
Docket No.: 20000223
Filing Date: 1/17/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: Per Curiam
Highlight: Res judicata, or claim preclusion, prohibits relitigation of claims or issues that were raised or could have been raised in a prior action between the same parties or their privies, and which were resolved by final judgment in a court of competent jurisdiction. Collateral estoppel, or issue preclusion, generally prohibits relitigation in a second action based on a different claim, of issues of fact or law which were, or must have been, determined in the prior suit. Without citations to relevant authority or supportive reasoning, an argument is without merit.
