Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
12401 - 12426 of 12426 results
|
State v. Bernstein
2005 ND App6
Highlight: To satisfy the knowledge element of criminal trespass under N.D.C.C. 12.1-22-03(3), the State must prove that the defendant knew or had a firm belief, unaccompanied by substantial doubt, that he was not licensed or privileged to be on the property. |
|
State v. Smith
2005 ND App5 Highlight: The enhanced sentencing language of N.D.C.C. 39-08-01.2(2), requiring at least 90 days incarceration, is invalid and unenforceable when sentencing a defendant found guilty of a class B misdemeanor DUI under N.D.C.C. 39-08-01. |
|
City of Grand Forks v. Barnum
2005 ND App4
Highlight: For a process to be a necessary part of the approved method, the State Toxicologist must expressly include it in the approved methodology and make it a part of the requirement for fair administration. |
|
Interest of A.K., et al. (Confidential)
2005 ND App3
Highlight: The State must prove the elements for termination of parental rights by clear and convincing evidence. |
|
Pautz v. N.B., et al. (Confidential) (cross-ref. w/20040229)
2005 ND App2 Highlight: The court summarily affirmed an order declaring a child delinquent and placing her in the custody of Division of Juvenile Services for one year. |
|
Ernst v. Tjon
2005 ND App1 Highlight: A summary judgment dismissing a defamation and libel action is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). |
|
Lang v. State, et al.
2001 ND App2
Highlight: Res judicata, or claim preclusion, prohibits relitigation of claims or issues that were raised or could have been raised in a prior action between the same parties or their privies, and which were resolved by final judgment in a court of competent jurisdiction. |
|
Lang v. Binstock
2001 ND App1 |
|
State v. Nowik
2000 ND App1
Highlight: The appellant's conviction for driving a vehicle with a suspended license is summarily affirmed by the Court of Appeals. |
|
Industrial Commission v. Wolf (Consolidated w/980053)
1999 ND App2 |
|
State v. Berlin
1999 ND App1 |
|
State v. Roberson
1998 ND App15 |
|
Beck v. Job Service North Dakota
1998 ND App14 |
|
State v. Rohde (Consolidated w/980213 & 980214)
1998 ND App13 |
|
Carver v. Miller
1998 ND App12 |
|
Cline v. Cline
1998 ND App11 |
|
Anseth v. Dupont Co.
1998 ND App10 |
|
Monson v. Monson
1998 ND App9 |
|
Wishnatsky v. Huey
1998 ND App8 |
|
Haugstad d/b/a HB Rentals v. Baltrusch
1998 ND App7 |
|
Severson v. Severson
1998 ND App6 |
|
McKibben, et al. v. Grigg, et al.
1998 ND App5 |
|
Interest of S.J.F. (CONFIDENTIAL)
1998 ND App4 |
|
Interest of A.J.K. (CONFIDENTIAL)
1998 ND App3 |
|
Mead v. ND Dept. of Transportation
1998 ND App2 |
|
City of Bismarck v. Glass
1998 ND App1 |