Opinions

Poochigian, et al. v. City of Grand Forks 2018 ND 144
Docket No.: 20170335
Filing Date: 6/11/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Election Contest
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A post-election claim challenging pre-election irregularities is rendered moot by the completion of the election.

Zuraff v. Reiger, et al. 2018 ND 143
Docket No.: 20170441
Filing Date: 6/5/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: A district court does not clearly err by concluding the domestic violence presumption under N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.2(1)(j) did not apply because there was insufficient evidence of domestic violence involving serious bodily injury.
A district court does not abuse its discretion by administering an oath from North Dakota to an out-of-state witness and allowing the witness to testify telephonically.

Thompson, et al. v. Johnson 2018 ND 142
Docket No.: 20170357
Filing Date: 6/5/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: A correct finding of an obligor's net income is essential to determine the proper amount of child support.
If the obligor's tax returns are not available or do not reasonably reflect the income from self-employment, profit and loss statements which more accurately reflect the obligor's current status must be used.

Morel v. State 2018 ND 141
Docket No.: 20170380
Filing Date: 6/5/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A new rule applies retroactively to final convictions in very limited circumstances. Substantive rules are generally applied retroactively because they carry a significant risk that a defendant stands convicted of an act the law does not make criminal or faces punishment the law cannot impose on him.
The rule announced in Birchfield, as it applies to criminal refusal to submit to a warrantless chemical blood test, is substantive and applies retroactively because the State no longer has authority to punish an individual for refusing to submit to a warrantless blood test.

Pettinger v. Carroll 2018 ND 140
Docket No.: 20170376
Filing Date: 6/5/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Probate, Wills, Trusts
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: On review of a summary judgment, if reasonable persons could reach only one conclusion from the facts, issues of fact may become issues of law.
Issues not pled or adequately briefed to the district court will not be considered on appeal.

Interest of B.A.K. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2018 ND 139
Docket No.: 20180176
Filing Date: 6/5/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Mental Health
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: A district court clearly errs by finding an individual is a person requiring treatment under N.D.C.C. § 25-03.1-02 when the evidence does not support the conclusion the individual's mental health deterioration would predictably result in dangerousness to the individual, others, or property.

Rath v. Rath 2018 ND 138
Docket No.: 20170239
Filing Date: 6/5/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: The district court has broad discretion over the presentation of evidence and conduct of a trial, in addition to whether to grant a continuance.
An appellant assumes the consequences and the risks of failing to provide a complete transcript.
A district court does not operate in a vacuum and may take judicial notice of its prior orders.
A district court's orders denying a motion for new trial and motion to reconsider will not be reversed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion.

Rourke v. State 2018 ND 137
Docket No.: 20170375
Filing Date: 6/5/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: In order to prevail on a post-conviction relief application based on ineffective assistance of counsel, the petitioner must (1) "show that counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness" and (2) "show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different."
A district court's findings of fact in post-conviction relief proceedings will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous.

Flaten v. Couture, et al. 2018 ND 136
Docket No.: 20170255
Filing Date: 6/5/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: If the language of a contract is unambiguous, extrinsic evidence is inadmissible to alter, vary, explain, or change the document.
Generally, a person who contracts as an agent for a nonexistent or fictitious entity will be personally liable on the contract.
A motion to alter or amend a judgment under N.D.R.Civ.P. 59(j) allows the court to correct errors of law, but the court may decline to consider issues raised for the first time.<br A motion for relief from judgment under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) is not to be used as a substitute for appeal or to relieve a party from calculated and deliberate choices he has made.

State v. Broom 2018 ND 135
Docket No.: 20170411
Filing Date: 6/5/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A law enforcement officer may conduct a frisk, or a pat-down search, of a person only when the officer possesses an articulable suspicion that an individual is armed and dangerous.
When conducting an outer clothing pat-down search for weapons, an officer is only entitled to continue to a more intrusive search of a person's inner garments if the pat-down reveals the presence of an object of a size and density that reasonably suggests the object might be a weapon. The purpose of the more invasive search is to ensure officer safety and to determine whether the object is in fact a weapon.