Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2251 - 2260 of 12364 results
State v. Kremer
2018 ND 61
Highlight: Self-represented parties should not be treated differently nor allowed any more or any less consideration than parties represented by counsel. "Property" subject to forfeiture includes noncontraband computer files as well as contraband computer files contained on an electronic device. |
State v. Isom
2018 ND 60
Highlight: A sentence for supervised probation may not exceed the legal maximum. |
Koenig v. State
2018 ND 59
Highlight: A defendant's statutory right to a speedy trial must be made within the 14-day window following arraignment. |
State, et al. v. White
2018 ND 58
Highlight: Relief from a final order or judgment under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) should be granted only when extraordinary circumstances are present. |
Sauter v. Miller, et al.
2018 ND 57
Highlight: The right to ownership of land and passage of title, as a consequence of adverse possession or acquiescence, occur when the statutory period for possession has been satisfied. |
State v. Rende
2018 ND 56
Highlight: A district court's use of jury instructions that fail to include every element of the offense is error. However, that error is waived if defendant invited the error by submitting proposed instructions that also failed to include every element of the offense and if the defendant failed to object to the instructions at trial. |
Snider, et al. v. Dickinson Elks Building, LLC
2018 ND 55 Highlight: Under N.D.C.C. § 43-07-02, a contractor is precluded from bringing any claims, suits, or actions related to the contractor's business or capacity as a contractor for periods when the contractor was not licensed. |
Comes v. State
2018 ND 54
Highlight: Affirmative defenses, including statutes of limitations, are waived if not pleaded. |
Tuhy v. Tuhy
2018 ND 53
Highlight: In a divorce, property division need not be equal to be equitable, but a substantial disparity must be explained. |
State v. Fleckenstein
2018 ND 52 Highlight: Law enforcement's reading of the implied consent advisory does not render consent to a blood test per se involuntary. Involuntariness must be examined under the totality of the circumstances. |