Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
12301 - 12350 of 12382 results
|
Kack v. Kack
142 N.W.2d 754 |
|
Morton Co. Bd. of Park Commissioners v. Wetsch
142 N.W.2d 751 |
|
Heasley v. Glinz
142 N.W.2d 606 |
|
City of Minot v. General Drivers & Helpers Union
142 N.W.2d 612 |
|
Blanton v. Blanton
142 N.W.2d 608 |
|
Glinz v. Heasley
142 N.W.2d 603 |
|
Waltman v. Austin
142 N.W.2d 517 |
|
State v. Wilson
142 N.W.2d 106 |
|
C.I.T. Corp. v. Hetland
143 N.W.2d 094 |
|
Pierce County Abstract v. Petterson
142 N.W.2d 620 |
|
Indianhead Truck Line v. Thompson
142 N.W.2d 138 |
|
Great Lakes Pipe Line Co. v. City of Grand Forks
142 N.W.2d 126 |
|
State v. Johnson
142 N.W.2d 110 |
|
State Auto & Cas. Underwriters v. Skjonsby
142 N.W.2d 098 |
|
Adams v. Little Missouri Minerals Ass'n
143 N.W.2d 659 |
|
Bertsch v. Zahn
141 N.W.2d 792 |
|
Writh v. Workmen's Comp. Bureau
141 N.W.2d 790 |
|
Beck v. Workmen's Comp. Bureau
141 N.W.2d 784 |
|
Putnam v. Dickinson
142 N.W.2d 111 |
|
United Accounts v. Palmer
141 N.W.2d 472 |
|
Nord v. Guy
141 N.W.2d 395 |
|
Hook v. Crary
142 N.W.2d 140 |
|
Mikkelson v. Risovi
141 N.W.2d 150 |
|
Johnson v. Davis
140 N.W.2d 703 |
|
Schmidt v. Frank
140 N.W.2d 588 |
|
Heid v. Shafer
140 N.W.2d 584 |
|
Cokins v. Frandsen
141 N.W.2d 796 |
|
Sittner v. Mistelski
140 N.W.2d 360 |
|
Stetson v. Investors Oil, Inc.
140 N.W.2d 349 |
|
Julson v. Loyal Order of Moose
140 N.W.2d 039 |
|
Quinn Dist. Co. v. North Hill Bowl, Inc., et al.
139 N.W.2d 860 |
|
Kuntz v. N.D. Workmen's Comp. Bureau
139 N.W.2d 525 |
|
Parceluk v. Knudtson
139 N.W.2d 864 |
|
Fischer v. Fischer
139 N.W.2d 845 |
|
Hoffman v. Berry
139 N.W.2d 529 |
|
Manock v. Donley
139 N.W.2d 391 |
|
Fredereickson v. Burleigh County, et al.
139 N.W.2d 250 |
|
City of Grand Forks v. Grand Forks County
139 N.W.2d 242 |
|
Bankers v. Bankers
139 N.W.2d 143 |
|
State v. Johnson
139 N.W.2d 157 |
|
Bender v. N.D. Workmen's Comp. Bureau
139 N.W.2d 150 |
|
Berry v. Heinz
139 N.W.2d 145 |
|
Wilson v. City of Fargo
141 N.W.2d 727 |
|
Newman v. Hjelle, et al.
133 N.W.2d 549 |
|
Sperle v. Weigel
130 N.W.2d 315 |
|
Kessler v. Thompson
075 N.W.2d 172 |
|
Haman v. McHenry County, et al.
072 N.W.2d 630 |
|
State v. Krebs
|
|
Riemers v. State
2007 ND App4
Highlight: A judgment of dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted will be affirmed by an appellate court if it cannot discern a potential for proof to support the claim. |
|
Riemers v. State
2007 ND App3
Highlight: Factual assertions in a brief do not raise an issue of material fact satisfying Rule 56(e) for purposes of resisting a motion for summary judgment. |