Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2801 - 2900 of 12418 results
State v. Rogahn
2016 ND 93
Highlight: Probable cause depends on the combined effect of all facts and circumstances included in the affidavit of probable cause, not the isolated effect of individual facts or circumstances. |
State v. Timm
2016 ND 92 Highlight: DUI conviction is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Interest of N.A. (Confidential)
2016 ND 91
Highlight: In termination of parental rights cases, a guardian ad litem's failure to interview an available parent is error. |
State, et al. v. Andres
2016 ND 90
Highlight: When a district court grants primary residential responsibility, it must calculate child support obligations for each parent assuming the other parent has primary residential responsibility for the child. |
Interest of Thill (cross-reference w/ 20130291 & 20150147)
2016 ND 89 Highlight: A district court order denying discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Trower
2016 ND 88 Highlight: Possession of stolen property and fleeing or attempting to elude a police officer convictions summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Schmuck v. Schmuck
2016 ND 87
Highlight: In determining whether to award spousal support, a party's need for support is not dispositive, and the district court must also consider whether the other party has an ability to pay. |
Kapple v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2016 ND 86 Highlight: A district court judgment reversing an administrative hearing officer's decision revoking driving privileges is summarily reversed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(b). |
The Next Step v. Redmon
2016 ND 85 Highlight: Unless an exception applies, an unincorporated associations are incapable of holding title to real property because they are not legal entities. |
Valentina Williston, LLC v. Gadeco, LLC
2016 ND 84
Highlight: When an oil and gas lease does not provide how the parties may modify its terms, the parties may alter the lease by a contract in writing, or by an executed oral agreement, and not otherwise. |
Rath v. Rath (cross ref w/ 20130025, 20130184, 20130327, 20140012, 20140291,
2016 ND 83
Highlight: Technical violations of a divorce judgment do not necessitate a finding of contempt. |
Gray v. Berg
2016 ND 82
Highlight: A party claiming bias must present more than general allegations amounting to nothing more than dissatisfaction with unfavorable court rulings. |
Langwald v. Langwald
2016 ND 81
Highlight: In a divorce proceeding, a district court's valuation and distribution of marital property will not be reversed on appeal unless clearly erroneous. |
Schmidt v. Levi
2016 ND 80
Highlight: North Dakota's implied consent and criminal refusal laws are constitutional. |
City of Fargo v. Rakowski
2016 ND 79
Highlight: A city has discretion to decide how to implement laws that promote public safety. |
Everett v. State
2016 ND 78
Highlight: An application for post-conviction relief must be filed within two years of the date the conviction becomes final, unless an exception applies. |
Gillmore v. Levi
2016 ND 77
Highlight: Whether a driver has voluntarily consented to field sobriety testing is not an issue for consideration in an administrative proceeding to suspend driving privileges. |
Larson v. Larson
2016 ND 76
Highlight: A district court may modify primary residential responsibility if it finds: (1) a material change in circumstances has occurred; and (2) a modification is necessary to serve the child's best interests. |
State v. Peltier
2016 ND 75 Highlight: Admitting evidence of sexual history for impeachment for a prior inconsistent statement requires an inconsistent statement. |
Lumley, et al. v. Kapusta
2016 ND 74
Highlight: The existence of an oral contract and its terms are questions of fact that will not be overturned on appeal unless they are clearly erroneous. |
Capital Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. N.D. Public Service Commission, et al.
2016 ND 73
Highlight: Appellate review of Commission findings of fact is limited to whether a reasoning mind reasonably could have determined that the factual conclusions reached were proven by the weight of the evidence from the entire record. |
State v. O'Connor
2016 ND 72 Highlight: If a law enforcement officer fails to provide a defendant a complete chemical test implied consent advisory after the defendant's arrest and before his submission to the chemical test, the result is inadmissible in any criminal or administrative proceeding under the implied consent laws. |
Rath v. Rath
2016 ND 71
Highlight: Due process dictates a decision to deviate from standard trial practices requires more than conclusory justifications. |
Welch Construction & Excavating, LLC v. Duong
2016 ND 70
Highlight: A party claiming breach of contract must prove the existence of a contract, a breach of the contract, and damages flowing from the breach. |
Schurmann v. Schurmann
2016 ND 69
Highlight: To modify parenting time, the moving party must demonstrate a material change in circumstances has occurred since entry of the previous parenting time order and the modification is in the best interests of the child. |
State v. James
2016 ND 68
Highlight: To justify stopping a moving vehicle for investigation, a law enforcement officer must have a reasonable and articulable suspicion a motorist has violated or is violating the law. |
Matter of K.J.C. (Confidential)
2016 ND 67
Highlight: In termination of parental rights proceedings, the custodial parent's refusal to cooperate with the noncustodial parent's attempts to maintain a relationship with the child is not insignificant in deciding whether the noncustodial parent abandoned the child, but the noncustodial parent must take affirmative steps to perform parental duties and foster a relationship with the child. |
4APM, LLP v. TCI Insurance Agency, Inc.
2016 ND 66
Highlight: Generally, an insurance agent's duty of care to an insured requires the agent to act in good faith and follow instructions. |
State v. Costa
2016 ND 65 Highlight: Counsel may not comment on facts not in evidence during closing argument, and a prosecutor may not vouch for evidence during closing argument. |
Cudmore v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2016 ND 64
Highlight: Before deciding whether to submit to chemical testing, an individual has a qualified statutory right to consult with an attorney. |
State v. Keller
2016 ND 63 Highlight: A district court does not abuse its discretion by refusing to give jury instructions that inadequately and inaccurately reflect the law. |
Curtiss v. State (cross-ref. w/20150007)
2016 ND 62
Highlight: The applicant in a post-conviction relief case has the burden of establishing grounds for relief. |
Degnan v. Degnan
2016 ND 61
Highlight: A district court does not abuse its discretion in granting spousal support and attorney's fee awards in amounts less than the requesting spouse's alleged need. |
Werven v. Werven
2016 ND 60
Highlight: Modification of spousal support is not warranted when the change in a party's financial circumstances is self-induced. |
State v. Putney
2016 ND 59
Highlight: A conviction rests upon insufficient evidence only when, after reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, no rational fact finder could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. |
City of Grand Forks v. Gale
2016 ND 58
Highlight: Delay attributable to an accused's purposeful evasion of prosecution may not result in a speedy trial violation, but the accused have no duty to bring themselves to trial. |
Martire' v. Martire' (cross ref 20110253, 20110197)
2016 ND 57
Highlight: Even when it is undisputed an obligor's net monthly income exceeds the income maximum under the Child Support Guidelines, the district court must determine the obligor's net income before it determines the appropriate upward deviation from the presumptive guideline amount. |
Woody v. Pembina County Annual Fair and Exhibition Association
2016 ND 56
Highlight: Owner of land inviting the public to use its property for recreational purposes without charge is protected from liability under N.D.C.C. ch. 53-08. |
State v. Quantz
2016 ND 55 Highlight: Convictions for disorderly conduct and indecent exposure are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1 (a)(3). |
Eagleman v. State
2016 ND 54
Highlight: Applicants for post-conviction relief are not entitled to relief when their claims have been rejected in prior proceedings. |
State v. Mann
2016 ND 53
Highlight: North Dakota's criminal refusal statute is constitutional under the Fourth Amendment and North Dakota Constitution article I, section 8. |
Matuska v. State
2016 ND 52 Highlight: Order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
State v. Odermann
2016 ND 51 Highlight: A criminal judgment for burglary and theft of property is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Interest of C.S. (Confidential)
2016 ND 50 Highlight: Order terminating parental rights summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Erickstad v. State
2016 ND 49 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (7). |
Vogt v. State
2016 ND 48 Highlight: A district court order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Aker v. Neiber
2016 ND 47 Highlight: Order denying motion to amend parenting time is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Rath v. Rath (cross ref. 20130025, 184 & 252; 20140012 & 291)
2016 ND 46
Highlight: A district court's decision on whether a contempt has been committed and remedial sanctions are warranted lies within its sound discretion and will not be overturned on appeal unless there is a clear abuse of discretion. |
Kittleson, et al. v. Grynberg Petroleum Company, et al.
2016 ND 44
Highlight: If a specific provision and a general provision in a contract conflict, the specific ordinarily prevails over the general. |
Nodak Mutual Ins. Co. v. Koller, et al.
2016 ND 43
Highlight: Whether an individual is a resident of a named insured's household for the purposes of an automobile insurance policy is a question of fact and technical notions of legal residence are not controlling. |
Williston Education Association v. Williston Public School Dist. No. 1
2016 ND 42
Highlight: Agreements between teacher associations and school boards must be read in light of the comprehensive statutory framework governing those relations. |
Annexation of a Part of Lewis & Clark Public School District
2016 ND 41
Highlight: A school district may be adversely affected by an annexation decision that causes the district to lose land or gain unwanted land. |
Brouillet v. Brouillet
2016 ND 40
Highlight: A district court's award of primary residential responsibility is a finding of fact, which will not be reversed on appeal unless it is clearly erroneous or it is not sufficiently specific to show the factual basis for the decision. |
State v. Reddig
2016 ND 39
Highlight: A defendant may not be convicted upon the testimony of an accomplice unless the testimony is corroborated by other evidence tending to connect the defendant with the commission of the crime. |
Sand v. Job Service, et al.
2016 ND 38
Highlight: N.D.R.Civ.P. 59 and 60 are not applicable to an administrative agency appeal to a district court. |
Desert Partners IV, L.P., et al. v. Benson, et al. (cross-reference w/20140066)
2016 ND 37
Highlight: An unrecorded instrument is valid between the parties to the instrument and those with notice. |
Dieterle v. Dieterle n/k/a Hansen (cross-reference w/20120329 & 20150030)
2016 ND 36
Highlight: An appellant may not collaterally attack an earlier unappealed decision. |
State v. Goodale
2016 ND 35
Highlight: When a default judgment is entered, the defendant may move for relief from the default judgment under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b). |
Haag v. Haag
2016 ND 34
Highlight: A material change of circumstances is an important new fact not known at the time of the prior order establishing residential responsibility. |
Erickson v. Olsen, et al. (cross-reference w/ 20130217)
2016 ND 33 Highlight: Under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(a), a court may correct a clerical mistake or mistake arising from oversight or omission when one is found in a judgment, but may not make substantive changes in a judgment. |
Estate of Vaage
2016 ND 32
Highlight: Evidence justifying reformation of a written instrument must be clear, specific, and convincing. |
State v. McClary
2016 ND 31
Highlight: A motion to correct an illegal sentence brought under the Rules of Criminal Procedure or brought under the Uniform Postconviction Procedure Act should be treated as equivalent to a motion under both provisions. |
Black Gold Oil Field Services, LLC v. City of Williston, et al.
2016 ND 30
Highlight: Granting or denying a preliminary injunction is based on: (1) substantial probability of succeeding on the merits; (2) irreparable injury; (3) harm to other interested parties; and (4) effect on the public interest. |
Interest of Johnson (cross-reference w/ 20120364 & 20140366)
2016 ND 29 Highlight: A district court must find a person has serious difficulty controlling his or her behavior to continue that person's commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. |
State v. Anderson
2016 ND 28
Highlight: The State cannot use a defendant's post-arrest silence as evidence of guilt, and the burden is on the State to prove that a comment on a defendant's post-arrest silence is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. |
State v. Stensaker (consolidated w/ 20150165)
2016 ND 27 Highlight: Murder conviction and two counts of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3); case remanded to fix clerical error in judgment. |
Interest of G.L.D. (CONFIDENTIAL)(cross-reference w/20100230,20120175,&2014
2016 ND 26 Highlight: Order denying request for discharge from commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Interest of G.L.D. (CONFIDENTIAL)(cross-reference w/20100230,20120175,&20140034)
2016 ND 25 Highlight: A district court order denying petition for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of N.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2016 ND 24 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Gomez v. State
2016 ND 23 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Benson v. State (cross-reference w/20130179)
2016 ND 22 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 7, SEJD (see 20160011)
2016 ND 21 Highlight: Judgeships retained at Jamestown and Valley City. |
PHI Financial Services, Inc. v. Johnston Law Office, P.C., et al.
2016 ND 20
Highlight: A party that acts as a "mere conduit" for a transfer of funds is not a "first transferee" for purposes of liability under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act. |
Titan Machinery, Inc. v. Patterson Enterprises, Inc., et al.
2016 ND 19
Highlight: A proponent may introduce into evidence a summary to prove the content of voluminous writings that cannot be conveniently examined in court. |
Estate of Glasoe, et al. v. Williams County, ND, et al.
2016 ND 18
Highlight: There must be strict compliance with mandatory jurisdictional requirements of the tax lien foreclosure statutes, and those statutes will be strictly construed in favor of the owners of the property. |
Palmer v. 999 Quebec, Inc., et al.
2016 ND 17
Highlight: Generally, the existence of a duty is a preliminary question of law for the court. When a duty does not exist, there is no negligence. |
Ritter v. Ritter
2016 ND 16 Highlight: A parent may establish a prima facie case for modification of residential responsibility following a stipulated divorce when the parent's affidavit evidences a significant change in employment resulting in a predictable work schedule and such modification is in the children's best interests. |
State v. Knox
2016 ND 15 Highlight: A district court's decision cannot be properly reviewed on appeal if the district court fails to make adequate findings explaining the evidentiary and legal basis for its decision. |
Wanttaja v. Wanttaja
2016 ND 14
Highlight: A district court has jurisdiction in divorce proceedings to award appropriate child support for a parties' child, even when a temporary support order has been entered by a district court in another county while the parties are still married. |
State v. Atkins
2016 ND 13
Highlight: Issues not brought before the district court are generally inappropriate for appeal. |
Forster v. Flaagan
2016 ND 12
Highlight: A prima facie case for modification of primary residential responsibility is a bare minimum standard requiring facts that would support modification if proven at an evidentiary hearing. |
State v. Hannah
2016 ND 11
Highlight: Pain is a phenomenon of common experience and understanding. |
State v. Horning
2016 ND 10
Highlight: The State may move for civil forfeiture of property within a criminal case. |
State v. 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee, et al. (cross-ref. w/20140444)
2016 ND 9
Highlight: A district court abuses its discretion when it does not follow the procedural requirement of providing notice before amending an order or judgment to correct a clerical error. |
State v. Ballard
2016 ND 8 Highlight: Suspicionless search of an unsupervised probationer's home is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. |
State v. Russell
2016 ND 7 Highlight: Amended criminal judgment revoking defendant's probation and sentencing him to prison is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (3). |
Sturre v. Levi
2016 ND 6 Highlight: Judgment affirming the Department of Transportation hearing officer's decision to suspend driving privileges for 180 days is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5) and (7). |
Myers v. State
2016 ND 5 Highlight: Denial of application for post-conviction relief is summarily reversed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(b). |
State v. Suelzle
2016 ND 4 Highlight: Criminal judgment for aggravated assault, aggravated reckless driving, reckless endangerment, leaving the scene of an accident involving serious personal injury, leaving the scene of an accident involving an unattended vehicle and leaving the scene of an accident involving an attended vehicle is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Johnson v. State
2016 ND 3 Highlight: Denial of an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 1, NEJD
2016 ND 2 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Devils Lake. |
Stock v. Stock
2016 ND 1
Highlight: It is not clearly erroneous for a court to award permanent spousal support instead of rehabilitative spousal support where the circumstances warrant both awards. |
Markgraf, et al. v. Welker, et al.
2015 ND 303
Highlight: Summary judgment is inappropriate if the court must draw inferences and make findings on disputed facts to support the judgment. |
Arrow Midstream Holdings, LLC, et al. v. 3 Bears Construction, LLC, et al.
2015 ND 302
Highlight: A dismissal without prejudice is final and appealable if it has the practical effect of terminating the litigation in the plaintiff's chosen forum. |
State v. Nelson (consolidated w/ 20150213)
2015 ND 301
Highlight: Restitution hearings are required when a defendant has pled guilty and the amount of restitution is in dispute or uncertain. |
Clark v. Farmers Union Mutual Ins., et al.
2015 ND 300
Highlight: Interpretation of an insurance contract is a question of law fully reviewable on appeal. |
Washburn v. Levi
2015 ND 299
Highlight: If an arrestee makes any affirmative mention of a need for an attorney before deciding whether to submit to chemical testing, law enforcement personnel must assume the arrestee is requesting an opportunity to consult with an attorney and must allow a reasonable opportunity to do so. |
Bayles v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2015 ND 298
Highlight: A district court may not reverse a hearing officer's decision to suspend driving privileges when the only basis was failure to file the transcript within the statutory period. |
State v. Williams
2015 ND 297 Highlight: The district court has discretion in deciding whether to grant a request for a transcript, and the court abuses its discretion by refusing the request if a particularized need, necessity, or justification for its preparation and use is shown. |
State v. Chatman
2015 ND 296
Highlight: Illegally obtained evidence cannot be used to establish probable cause to issue a search warrant, but a court is not required to suppress evidence obtained as a result of the search warrant if there was sufficient legal evidence presented to the issuing magistrate to establish probable cause. |